Cited by 167Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismAction Observation and Synchronization

Processing language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster responses

Open access
Holler, Judith, Kendrick, Kobin H., Levinson, Stephen C.·2018·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

The home of human language use is face-to-face interaction, a context in which communicative exchanges are characterised not only by bodily signals accompanying what is being said but also by a pattern of alternating turns at talk. This transition between turns is astonishingly fast-typically a mere 200-ms elapse between a current and a next speaker's contribution-meaning that comprehending, producing, and coordinating conversational contributions in time is a significant challenge. This begs the question of whether the additional information carried by bodily signals facilitates or hinders language processing in this time-pressured environment. We present analyses of multimodal conversations revealing that bodily signals appear to profoundly influence language processing in interaction: Questions accompanied by gestures lead to shorter turn transition times-that is, to faster responses-than questions without gestures, and responses come earlier when gestures end before compared to after the question turn has ended. These findings hold even after taking into account prosodic patterns and other visual signals, such as gaze. The empirical findings presented here provide a first glimpse of the role of the body in the psycholinguistic processes underpinning human communication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-017-1363-z

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent evidence has highlighted the importance of visual information for turn-taking.

    “However, recent evidence has highlighted the importance of visual information for turn-taking (e.g., Holler & Levinson 2019; Holler, Kendrick & Levinson, 2018).”

    From Timing in Conversation (2023) · cites this paper as Holler et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (NL)
Corresponding author
Holler, Judith
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2017-09-08
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
1900-1908
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2752741953
Cited by
167
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
61.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • H2020 European Research Council (269484)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
face-to-face communication, turn-taking, gesture, questions, language processing, multimodal communication, body signals, prosody, gaze, response latency, psycholinguistics
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Gestures, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Psycholinguistics, Social Perception, Speech Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review