Cited by 66Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Offloading memory: Serial position effects

Open access
Kelly, Megan O., Risko, Evan F.·2019·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Despite the long history and pervasiveness of cognitive offloading as a memory strategy, the memorial fate of offloaded information is not well understood. Recent work has suggested that offloading information may engage similar mechanisms as instructions to forget (e.g., directed forgetting). In the present investigation, we test this prediction by examining the serial position effect for offloaded information. Previous research has demonstrated that "forget" instructions can eliminate the primacy effect while leaving an intact recency effect. Across two experiments, participants completed a number of free recall trials using an external aid and then a final recall trial without the external aid. We compared a group that was expecting to use the aid for the final trial (offloading) with a group that was not (no-offloading). We found a memory impairment for offloaded items that was characterized by a reduced primacy effect but a typical recency effect, similar to what has been reported in research on intentional/directed forgetting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-019-01615-8

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite identical stimulus encoding, participants remembered word lists less accurately when they thought they would have access to external representations than when they thought they would have to rely on their internal memory.

    “Moreover, Kelly and Risko (2019) recently studied how relying on external representations affects memory accuracy for the offloaded information. Despite identical stimulus encoding, the participants of this study remembered word lists less accurately when they thought they would have access to external representations than when they thought they would have to rely on their internal memory.”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Kelly and Risko (2019)

  • In prior lines of research, participants typically could not choose how to perform the task while encoding task-relevant information.

    “Critically, in these lines of research, the participants typically could not choose how to perform the task while encoding task-relevant information (e.g., Eskritt & Ma, 2014; Kelly & Risko, 2019; Sparrow et al., 2011).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Kelly & Risko, 2019

  • Offloading is linked to intentional forgetting.

    “A recent paper links offloading to intentional forgetting”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Kelly & Risko, 2019a

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kelly, M. O., & Risko, E. F.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Kelly, Megan O.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2019-06-03
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1347-1353
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2948073202
Cited by
66
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Cognitive Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
cognitive offloading, serial position effect, primacy effect, recency effect, free recall, external memory aids, directed forgetting, intentional forgetting, memory impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Recall, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review