Cited by 194Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Storing information in-the-world: Metacognition and cognitive offloading in a short-term memory task

Risko, Evan F., Dunn, Timothy L.·2015·Consciousness and Cognition

Abstract

We often store to-be-remembered information externally (e.g., written down on a piece of paper) rather than internally. In the present investigation, we examine factors that influence the decision to store information in-the-world versus in-the-head using a variant of a traditional short term memory task. In Experiments 1a and 1b participants were presented with to-be-remembered items and either had to rely solely on internal memory or had the option to write down the presented information. In Experiments 2a and 2b participants were presented with the same stimuli but made metacognitive judgments about their predicted performance and effort expenditure. The spontaneous use of external storage was related both to the number of items to be remembered and an individual's actual and perceived short-term-memory capacity. Interestingly, individuals often used external storage despite its use affording no observable benefit. Implications for understanding how individuals integrate external resources in pursuing cognitive goals are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.014

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of working memory capacity on offloading has been controversially discussed in previous research.

    “We chose to implement these tasks as the impact of working memory capacity on offloading has been controversially discussed in previous research (e.g., Morrison & Richmond, 2020; Risko & Dunn, 2015).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Risko & Dunn, 2015

  • A higher intrinsic cognitive load leads to more offloading.

    “(4) A higher intrinsic cognitive load leads to more offloading (see, e.g., Dong etal., 2022; Risko & Dunn, 2015).”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Risko & Dunn, 2015

  • Learners with a lower perceived working memory capacity also offload more information.

    “(2) Learners with a lower perceived working memory capacity also offload more information (Risko & Dunn, 2015).”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Risko & Dunn, 2015

  • Short-term memory capacity, measured by performance in a no-choice condition, is inversely related to frequency of offloading in a choice condition.

    “They demonstrated that short-term memory capacity, measured by performance in a “no-choice condition” of their task where participants were not permitted to offload, was inversely related to the frequency of offloading in the choice condition during which participants were able to choose whether or not to offload information.”
  • Individuals who engage in offloading even when there is no objective performance benefit may be driven to do so by the incorrect belief that offloading will lead to better performance.

    “Recent work suggests that individuals who engage in offloading even when there is no objective performance benefit may be driven to do so by the incorrect belief that offloading will lead to better performance (Risko & Dunn, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Risko, E. F., & Dunn, T. L.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Risko, Evan F.
Venue
Consciousness and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
36
Pages
61-74
ISSN
1053-8100 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W583781945
Cited by
193
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Consciousness and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive offloading, external memory, metacognition, short-term memory, memory capacity, metacognitive judgments, effort expenditure
MeSH terms
Metacognition, Adult, Auditory Perception, Choice Behavior, Humans, Individuality, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review