Cited by 61Interactive and Immersive DisplaysUsability and User Interface DesignHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Interface and interaction design: How mobile touch devices foster cognitive offloading

Grinschgl, Sandra, Meyerhoff, Hauke S., Papenmeier, Frank·2020·Computers in Human Behavior

Abstract

Abstract A central feature of modern technologies such as smartphones or tablets is that they allow for the externalization of working memory processes (i.e. cognitive offloading). Such externalizations enable their users to perform beyond the limitations of internal cognitive processing. In this experimental study (N = 172), we investigated two determinants of participants' decision to offload working memory processes when using mobile devices. These determinants, interface design (i.e. responsivity in terms of temporal delay) and interaction design (touch-based vs. mouse-based control) of the involved mobile devices altered offloading behavior in a Pattern Copy Task. We observed that participants performing the task with a highly responsive device (i.e. no delay when accessing relevant information) offloaded more working memory processes than participants handling the same device at a lower responsivity (i.e. temporal delay). Further, participants using the device's touch function also offloaded more working memory processes than participants using a computer mouse. These findings were further supported by subjective measures about the easiness, naturalness, and intuitivity when using the device. Thus, our study showed that both interface and interaction design influence metacognitive evaluations of the use of mobile devices and offloading behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106317

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Increasing access costs by adding temporal delays for each inspection of the model window shifts behaviour from offloading strategies to more memory-based strategies; thus, higher temporal costs reduce offloading behaviour.

    “the work of Fu and Gray (2000; see also Gray et al., 2006; Grinschgl, Meyerhoff, & Papenmeier, 2020; Patrick et al., 2015; Waldron et al., 2011) has shown that increasing access costs by adding temporal delays for each inspection of the model window results in a shift from offloading strategies to more memory-based strategies. Thus, higher temporal costs reduce offloading behaviour.”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Grinschgl, Meyerhoff, & Papenmeier, 2020

  • People offload more when using a touch interface rather than mouse controls.

    “A related study revealed that people offload more when using a touch interface rather than mouse controls (Grinschgl et al., 2020).”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Grinschgl et al., 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Moritz, 2019, Effects with and effects of representation control in incidental learning, Journal of Educational Psychology

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grinschgl, S., Meyerhoff, H. S., & Papenmeier, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien (DE)
Corresponding author
Grinschgl, Sandra
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
108
Pages
106317
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3009686572
Cited by
61
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
4.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
  • Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
  • Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
cognitive offloading, working memory, interface design, interaction design, responsivity, time delay, metacognition, usability, smartphones, tablets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review