The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dangers and uses of cross-correlation in analyzing time series in perception, performance, movement, and neuroscience: The importance of constructing transfer function autoregressive models
Open accessAbstract
Many articles on perception, performance, psychophysiology, and neuroscience seek to relate pairs of time series through assessments of their cross-correlations. Most such series are individually autocorrelated: they do not comprise independent values. Given this situation, an unfounded reliance is often placed on cross-correlation as an indicator of relationships (e.g., referent vs. response, leading vs. following). Such cross-correlations can indicate spurious relationships, because of autocorrelation. Given these dangers, we here simulated how and why such spurious conclusions can arise, to provide an approach to resolving them. We show that when multiple pairs of series are aggregated in several different ways for a cross-correlation analysis, problems remain. Finally, even a genuine cross-correlation function does not answer key motivating questions, such as whether there are likely causal relationships between the series. Thus, we illustrate how to obtain a transfer function describing such relationships, informed by any genuine cross-correlations. We illustrate the confounds and the meaningful transfer functions by two concrete examples, one each in perception and performance, together with key elements of the R software code needed. The approach involves autocorrelation functions, the establishment of stationarity, prewhitening, the determination of cross-correlation functions, the assessment of Granger causality, and autoregressive model development. Autocorrelation also limits the interpretability of other measures of possible relationships between pairs of time series, such as mutual information. We emphasize that further complexity may be required as the appropriate analysis is pursued fully, and that causal intervention experiments will likely also be needed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Cross‐correlation applied to nonstationary and autocorrelated time series, such as cardiac signals, may lead to spurious results (Dean and Dunsmuir 2016).”
From Interpersonal Physiological Synchrony During Dyadic Joint Action Is Increased by Task Novelty and Reduced by Social Anxiety (2025) · cites this paper as Dean and Dunsmuir 2016
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Indeed, physiological signals, especially heart rate, often exhibit autocorrelation.”
From Interpersonal Synchronization of Autonomic Physiology via Mere Visual Contact (2026) · cites this paper as [110]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breitung, J., & Hamilton, J. D. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076916 · Cited by 11,114
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 · Cited by 8,540
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
Hamilton, J. D. (1994) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9780691218632 · Cited by 7,941
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
Button, K. S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B. A., Flint, J., Robinson, E. S. J., & Munafò, M. R. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3475 · Cited by 7,641 · cited 1×
“This may also be one component of the reasons for the unreliability of results in fields such as neuroimaging (Button et al., 2013; Carp, 2012), which we will not consider directly here.”
ResultApplied econometric time series
Enders, W. (1995) · Journal of Macroeconomics · doi:10.1016/0164-0704(95)80068-9 · Cited by 4,902
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
Intons-Peterson, M. J. (1981) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/h0078016 · Cited by 3,270
Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics using R
Baayen, R. H. (2008) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511801686 · Cited by 3,253
Applied Econometric Time Series.
mw, & Enders, W. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291367 · Cited by 2,991
Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., & Smith, G. M. (2007) · Statistics in the health sciences · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-45972-1 · Cited by 2,505
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–216 of 216
Autocorrelation and its Effects on Biomechanical Data of the Knee Joint
Shao, E., Liu, Q., & Goda, T. J. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Applied Computational Intelligence and Informatics (SACI) · doi:10.1109/saci66288.2025.11030205
Marinis, M. D., Bossi, F., Gargano, A., Frumento, S., Callara, A. L., Pardini, M., Magnolfi, L., Biundo, G. L., Scilingo, E. P., & Greco, A. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) · doi:10.1109/memea65319.2025.11068063
Trend analysis of influenza in Southern Asia using multi-fractal detrended fluctuation analysis
Prasad, N., & Bhattacharyya, A. (2025) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/adea64
Cannistra, C., Hoang, L., Yuan, A. E., & Shou, W. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108198
Tracking SARS-CoV-2 transmission: evaluation of the Québec wastewater surveillance program
Jobin, C. J., Dubé, M., Bouchard, F., Lamothe, F., Duquesne, L., & Huot, C. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Health Research · doi:10.1080/09603123.2025.2591162
Assessing chance in neuro-vascular interactions
Aksenov, D. P., Doubovikov, E. D., Serdyukova, N. A., Gascoigne, D. A., Miller, M. J., Drobyshevsky, A., & Linsenmeier, R. A. (2025) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121676
Alwin, A., Gottsacker, M., Furuya, H., Lisle, L., Bruder, G., & Welch, G. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · doi:10.1109/vrw70859.2026.00078
Synchronization dynamics between rider and saddle motion across gaits revealed by IMU analysis
Louis, A. T., Louis, A. T., & Mikkola, A. (2026) · Journal of Equine Veterinary Science · doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2026.105939
Hybrid Machine-Learning and Wavelet-Based Estimation of GARMAX for EEG Rhythmic Dynamics
Gonzaga, A. (2026) · IEEE International Colloquium on Signal Processing & Its Applications (CSPA) · doi:10.1109/cspa68262.2026.11517713 · Cited by 1
A transdiagnostic AI-based measure of interpersonal coordination in autism and other conditions
Yankowitz, L. D., Zampella, C., Pandey, J., Bartley, G. K., Parish‐Morris, J., Brodkin, E. S., Herrington, J. D., Tunç, B., Schultz, R. T., & Sarıyanidi, E. (2026) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-026-00722-3
Denk, B., Wienhold, S., Volkmer, N., Troje, N. F., Meier, M., & Pruessner, J. C. (2026) · Frontiers in Network Physiology · doi:10.3389/fnetp.2026.1869004
Time lags and their association with the boundary layer structure in a Z source GX 349+2
R., A. M. V., K․, S., & Gouse, S. (2026) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100718
Measuring Mutual Causality in Macroeconomy
Dobrescu, E. (2026) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-18962-2_1
lagCI enables inference of temporal causal relationships from dense multi-omic time series
Ge, Y., Bai, S., Qiang, Z., Liu, Y., Wu, Y., & Shen, X. (2026) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbag464
COVID-19 rapid antigen tests as a surveillance tool for population-wide pandemic monitoring
Wuttke, D., Antão, E.-M., Witzke, S., Hildt, E., Renard, B. Y., Hasberg, T., & Wieler, L. H. (2026) · npj Digital Public Health · doi:10.1038/s44482-026-00041-7
Metadata
- Authors
- Dean, R. T., & Dunsmuir, W. T. M.
- Affiliations
- Western Sydney University (AU)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Dean, Roger T.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2015-06-23
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 783-802
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W815444466
- Cited by
- 215
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 8.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
- Keywords
- cross correlation function, autocorrelation, spurious correlations, transfer function, autoregressive models, Granger causality, prewhitening, stationarity, mutual information, time series analysis, perception, performance, psychophysiology, motion analysis, neuroscience
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Movement, Neuropsychological Tests, Neurosciences, Perception, Psychomotor Performance, Software, Models, Statistical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
