The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Turking in the time of COVID
Open accessAbstract
On March 16, 2020, the US Government introduced strict social distancing protocols for the United States in an effort to stem the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic. This had an immediate major effect on the job market, with millions of Americans forced to find alternative ways to make a living from home. As online labor markets like Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) play a major role in social science research, concerns have been raised that the pandemic may be reducing the diversity of subjects participating in experiments. Here, we investigate this possibility empirically. Specifically, we look at 15,539 responses gathered in 23 studies run on MTurk between February and July 2020, examining the distribution of gender, age, ethnicity, political preference, and analytic cognitive style. We find notable changes on some of the measures following the imposition of nationwide social distancing: participants are more likely to be less reflective (as measured by the Cognitive Reflection Test), and somewhat less likely to be white, Democrats (traditionally over-represented on MTurk), and experienced with MTurk. Most of these differences are explained by an influx of new participants into the MTurk subject pool who are more diverse and representative - but also less attentive - than previous MTurkers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This is likely due in large part to participants on MTurk being quite a bit more attentive than participants on Lucid50”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620939054 · Cited by 1,715
Self-citationReputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Peer, E., Vosgerau, J., & Acquisti, A. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0434-y · Cited by 1,618
The Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market∗Preprint
Zeckhauser, R. J. (2016) · Cited by 1,454
Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12081 · Cited by 951
Chandler, J., Mueller, P., & Paolacci, G. (2014) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0365-7 · Cited by 950
Evans, D. C., Schott, R. K., Larson, D. W., Brown, C. M., & Ryan, M. J. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4289 · Cited by 942
Intuitive Cooperation and the Social Heuristics Hypothesis: Evidence from 15 Time Constraint Studies
Rand, D. G., Peysakhovich, A., Kraft‐Todd, G., Newman, G. E., Wurzbacher, O., Nowak, M. A., & Greene, J. D. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4677 · Cited by 772
Self-citationThe Online Laboratory: Conducting Experiments in a Real Labor Market
Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., & Zeckhauser, R. (2010) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w15961 · Cited by 402
Self-citationRobinson, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., & Litman, L. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226394 · Cited by 203
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Douglas, B. D., Ewell, P. J., & Brauer, M. (2023) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0279720 · Cited by 1,532
Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2021) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1079 · Cited by 625
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30073-5 · Cited by 270
Self-citationThe Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Peyton, K., Huber, G. A., & Coppock, A. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2021.17 · Cited by 174
Comparing attentional disengagement between prolific and MTurk samples
Albert, D. A., & Smilek, D. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-46048-5 · Cited by 166
Moss, A. J., Rosenzweig, C., Robinson, J., Jaffe, S. N., & Litman, L. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-02005-0 · Cited by 129
A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020
Ternovski, J., Orr, L., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2022) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2022.002 · Cited by 103
Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, I., Rodríguez, J., Shirvanizadeh, N., Ortíz, A., & Pardo-Quiles, D. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18168578 · Cited by 82
The Generalizability of Online Experiments Conducted During The COVID-19 PandemicPreprint
Peyton, K., Huber, G. A., & Coppock, A. (2020) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/s45yg · Cited by 69
Mass support for proposals to reshape policing depends on the implications for crime and safety
Vaughn, P. E., Peyton, K., & Huber, G. A. (2022) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12572 · Cited by 64
Validated names for experimental studies on race and ethnicity
Crabtree, C. D., Kim, J. Y., Gaddis, S. M., Holbein, J. B., Guage, C., & Marx, W. W. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-01947-0 · Cited by 64
Zickgraf, H. F., & Barrada, J. R. (2021) · Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity · doi:10.1007/s40519-021-01263-9 · Cited by 60
Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable NLP.Preprint
Wiegreffe, S., & Marasović, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 57
Imundo, M. N., & Rapp, D. N. (2021) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.10.002 · Cited by 49
(2022) · doi:10.1145/3491102.3501957 · Cited by 47
Emotion may predict susceptibility to fake news but emotion regulation does not seem to help
Bagó, B., Rosenzweig, L. R., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2022) · Cognition & Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2022.2090318 · Cited by 53
Self-citationSocial identity and support for defunding the police in the aftermath of George Floyd’s murder
Jackson, J., Fine, A., Bradford, B., & Trinkner, R. J. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302221128230 · Cited by 47
The Burden for High-Quality Online Data Collection Lies With Researchers, Not Recruitment Platforms
Cuskley, C. F., & Sulik, J. (2024) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916241242734 · Cited by 48
Linkages between Psychedelics and Meditation in a Population-Based Sample in the United States
Simonsson, O., & Goldberg, S. B. (2022) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2021.2022816 · Cited by 41
Jackson, J., McKay, T. E., Cheliotis, L. K., Bradford, B., Fine, A., & Trinkner, R. J. (2021) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000524 · Cited by 54
de Oliveira, G. S., & Baggs, E. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009303538 · Cited by 57
Calibration of cognitive tests to address the reliability paradox for decision-conflict tasks
Kucina, T., Wells, L., Lewis, I., de Salas, K., Kohl, A. T., Palmer, M. A., Sauer, J., Matzke, D., Aidman, E., & Heathcote, A. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37777-2 · Cited by 28
Increasing Organ Donor Registrations with Behavioral Interventions: A Field Experiment
Robitaille, N., Mažar, N., Tsai, C. I., Haviv, A. M., & Hardy, E. (2021) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242921990070 · Cited by 37
Byrd, N., & Białek, M. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104649 · Cited by 32
Greaney, M. L., Kunicki, Z. J., Drohan, M. M., Ward‐Ritacco, C. L., Riebe, D. A., & Cohen, S. A. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11294-7 · Cited by 29
Running online experiments using web-conferencing software
Li, J., Leider, S., Beil, D. R., & Duenyas, I. (2021) · Journal of the Economic Science Association · doi:10.1007/s40881-021-00112-w · Cited by 27
Love thy (partisan) neighbor: Brief befriending meditation reduces affective polarization
Simonsson, O., Narayanan, J., & Marks, J. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211020108 · Cited by 35
Is the juice worth the squeeze? Learning the marginal value of mental effort over time.
Otto, A. R., Braem, S., Silvetti, M., & Vassena, E. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0001208 · Cited by 29
When Truth Trumps Facts: Studies on Partisan Moral Flexibility in American Politics
Kim, M. J., Hahl, O., Poskanzer, E. J., & Zuckerman, E. W. (2024) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/730763 · Cited by 25
Work experience on algorithm-based platforms: The bright and dark sides of turking
Orhan, M. A., Khelladi, I., Castellano, S., & Singh, S. K. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121907 · Cited by 28
Hsu, T., Hoffman, L., & Thomas, E. B. K. (2023) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0001214 · Cited by 23
Kassem, S. (2022) · Global Political Economy · doi:10.1332/uvgt2823 · Cited by 20
Krockow, E. M., Cheng, K. O., Maltby, J., & McElroy, E. (2023) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-023-00379-6 · Cited by 19
Why do Experiments Fail? Six Practical Suggestions for Successful Online Experiments
Kim, J. (2023) · Journal of Travel Research · doi:10.1177/00472875231209983 · Cited by 16
Facial trustworthiness predicts ingroup inclusion decisions
Tracy, R. E., Wilson, J. P., Slepian, M. L., & Young, S. G. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104047 · Cited by 15
Common knowledge promotes cooperation in the threshold public goods game by reducing uncertainty
Deutchman, P., Amir, D., Jordan, M. R., & McAuliffe, K. (2021) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.12.003 · Cited by 14
Attention! Do We Really Need Attention Checks?
Roth, Y., & Yakobi, O. (2024) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.2377 · Cited by 18
Bonus, J. A., Watts, J., & Francemone, C. J. (2022) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1093/joc/jqac028 · Cited by 15
Social media and hiring: a survey experiment on discrimination based on online social class cues
Galos, D. R. (2023) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcad012 · Cited by 15
Cognitive challenges in human-AI collaboration: Investigating the path towards productive delegationPreprint
Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3368813 · Cited by 17
Digital Literacy and Vulnerability to Misinformation
Ali, A., & Qazi, I. A. (2022) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2022.025 · Cited by 12
Risk attitudes: The central tendency bias
Akbari, K., Eigruber, M., & Vetschera, R. (2023) · EURO Journal on Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.ejdp.2023.100042 · Cited by 17
Shelter-in-place orders, loneliness, and collaborative behavior
Babin, J. J., Foray, M., & Hussey, A. J. (2021) · Economics & Human Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2021.101056 · Cited by 12
Did the COVID-19 pandemic help or hurt Donald Trump’s political fortunes?
Hart, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247664 · Cited by 11
Conducting interactive experiments on Toloka
Chapkovski, P. (2023) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbef.2023.100790 · Cited by 11
Worth the Risk? Greater Acceptance of Instrumental Harm Befalling Men than Women
Graso, M., Reynolds, T., & Aquino, K. (2023) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-023-02571-0 · Cited by 10
“Moreover, our data were collected during the earlier days of COVID-19, which could have influenced the composition or motivations of our samples (Arechar & Rand, 2021).”
MethodVillavisanis, D. F., Blum, J. D., Cheung, L., Cho, D., Bartlett, S. P. P., Swanson, J. W., & Taylor, J. A. (2023) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000010232 · Cited by 10
People can use the placement of objects to infer communicative goals
Lopez-Brau, M., & Jara‐Ettinger, J. (2020) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105524 · Cited by 10
Lee, B., Lee, K., & Hartmann, B. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi1540 · Cited by 11
Reforming the Police: Examining the Effect of Message Framing on Police Reform Policy Preferences
Dunbar, A., & Hanink, P. A. (2023) · Criminal Justice Policy Review · doi:10.1177/08874034231211259 · Cited by 10
Douthit, J. D., Kachelmeier, S. J., & Landuyt, B. W. V. (2024) · Accounting Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2024.101550 · Cited by 9
Vogel, M., Krüger, J., & Junne, F. (2022) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.23675 · Cited by 9
Sleep Quality Among Informal Caregivers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study
Greaney, M. L., Kunicki, Z. J., Drohan, M. M., Nash, C. C., & Cohen, S. A. (2022) · Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1177/23337214211057387 · Cited by 11
Petersen, L., & Rholes, R. (2022) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104460 · Cited by 9
Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.
Bejjani, C., Siqi-Liu, A., & Egner, T. (2021) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0001074 · Cited by 10
Spinelli, G., & Lupker, S. (2024) · Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-024-02892-9 · Cited by 7
Love Thy (Partisan) Neighbor: Brief Befriending Meditation Reduces Affective PolarizationPreprint
Simonsson, O., Narayanan, J., & Marks, J. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3674051 · Cited by 8
Blakeman, J. R., Eckhardt, A. L., & Kim, M. (2022) · The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1097/jcn.0000000000000931 · Cited by 7
Emotional Intelligence and Collaborative Dynamics in Industry 5.0 for Human-Machine Interactions
Singh, S., Rai, M., Pandey, J. K., & Saxena, A. K. (2024) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-6806-0.ch010 · Cited by 5
Madan, S., Savani, K., & Johar, G. V. (2025) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2025.06.004 · Cited by 5
Lee, H., Pickett, J. T., Graham, A., Cullen, F. T., Jonson, C. L., Haner, M., & Sloan, M. M. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-024-09610-3 · Cited by 5
Mourelatos, E., Simonen, J., Hosio, S. J., Likhobaba, D., & Ustalov, D. (2024) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-024-01196-6 · Cited by 5
The original sin of crowd work for human subjects research
Xia, H. (2022) · Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society · doi:10.1108/jices-12-2021-0126 · Cited by 6
Emotion may predict susceptibility to fake news but emotion regulation does not seem to helpPreprint
Bagó, B., Rosenzweig, L. R., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hm9vu · Cited by 5
Self-citationDupuis, M., Studer, J., Wicki, M., Marmet, S., & Gmel, G. E. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0286597 · Cited by 4
Good Cop, Bad Cop, Black Cop, White Cop: Unraveling Public Perceptions of Police Use of Force
Dunbar, A., Hanink, P. A., & Kyle, B. (2024) · Crime & Delinquency · doi:10.1177/00111287241268298 · Cited by 4
Huang, C., Huang, W., & Yen, H. (2023) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.3389/ijph.2023.1605585 · Cited by 4
Beyond Pandering: Investment Project Quality, Voter Support, and the Use of Investment Incentives
Jud, S. (2023) · Business and Politics · doi:10.1017/bap.2023.20 · Cited by 3
Fairness preferences revisited
Zhang, Y., Hoffmann, M., Sara, R., & Eckel, C. C. (2024) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2024.04.033 · Cited by 3
Levy, A., Nguyen, C. Q., Slepian, M. L., Gaither, S. E., Pauker, K., & Dovidio, J. F. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221084537 · Cited by 3
When Text is Not Enough: The Processing of Text and Illustration for Emerging Medical Technologies
Huang, Q. E., & Peng, W. (2022) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2022.2074490 · Cited by 3
Dialect on Trial: An Experimental Examination of Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Character Judgments
Dunbar, A., King, S., & Vaughn, C. R. (2024) · Race and Justice · doi:10.1177/21533687241258772 · Cited by 3
Use of crowdsourced images for determining 2D:4D and relationship to pro-environmental variables
Pickering, G. J., Anger, N., Baird, J., Dale, G., & Tattersall, G. J. (2022) · acta ethologica · doi:10.1007/s10211-022-00401-5 · Cited by 3
Schneegans, T., Bachman, M. D., Huettel, S. A., & Heekeren, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zm3us · Cited by 4
The Duality of Empowerment and Marginalization in Microtask Crowdsourcing: A Replication
Hadavi, Y., Villafranca, E., & Petter, S. (2022) · AIS Transactions on Replication Research · doi:10.17705/1atrr.00073 · Cited by 2
People can understand IPCC visuals and are not influenced by colors
Battocletti, V., Romano, A., & Sotis, C. (2023) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/acfb95 · Cited by 2
Reimer, T. O., & Johnson, N. (2022) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02753-4 · Cited by 2
Story stimuli for instantiating true and false beliefs about the world
Salovich, N. A., Imundo, M. N., & Rapp, D. N. (2022) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-022-01904-6 · Cited by 2
Narrow Bracketing in Work ChoicesPreprint
Fallucchi, F., & Kaufmann, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Lives or Livelihoods? Perceived Tradeoffs and Public Demand for Non-Pharmaceutical InterventionsPreprint
Settele, S., & Shupe, C. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3589891 · Cited by 2
Experiences and Perceptions of Default NudgesPreprint
Michaelsen, P. (2021) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3jm6a · Cited by 2
Do decision makers have subjective probabilities? An experimental testPreprint
Ronayne, D., Veneziani, R., & Zame, W. R. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4143504 · Cited by 2
Attention Checks in Decisions From Experience: The Case of Checking ExperimentsPreprint
Roth, Y., & Yakobi, O. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/63qht · Cited by 2
Madore, K. P., Osman, A. M., Kerlan, K. R., & Schafer, R. J. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.04.05.24305401 · Cited by 2
Public opinion on compensating different types of wrongful convictions
Wu, S. (2023) · doi:10.54014/959r-5b0w · Cited by 2
Time-Horizon and Timescale Effects in the Quasi-Hyperbolic Discounting Model
Acland, D. J. (2025) · Review of Behavioral Economics · doi:10.1561/105.00000211 · Cited by 1
Brandt, E., Lam, J. K. H., & Conway, P. J. (2025) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.70018 · Cited by 1
How Reflection Enhances Task Factuality in the Use of Large Language Models
Tarafdar, M., Adam, M., & Nguyen, L. T. (2026) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2026.2692283 · Cited by 1
Tragedy of the Commons in Crowd Work-Based Research
Xia, H. (2023) · ACM Journal on Responsible Computing · doi:10.1145/3626493 · Cited by 1
A Phenomenological Study of the Experiences of Front Liner Police Officers Infected with Covid-19
Saguran, J. B. (2023) · International Journal of Science and Management Studies (IJSMS) · doi:10.51386/25815946/ijsms-v6i4p123 · Cited by 1
Tahaei, M., & Vaniea, K. E. (2021) · University of Edinburgh · doi:10.7488/ds/3184 · Cited by 1
Lee, B., Lee, K., & Hartmann, B. S. (2023) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/5b3a4 · Cited by 2
Brandt, E., & Conway, P. J. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4607975 · Cited by 1
Does Auditor Assurance of Client Prosocial Activities Affect Auditor-Client Negotiations?Preprint
Douthit, J. D., Kachelmeier, S. J., & Landuyt, B. W. V. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3571812
Vosburg, S. K., Faraone, S. V., Riley, E. N., Whitaker, T., Kardish, J., Baker, D., Kollins, S. H., & Rush, C. R. (2022) · Journal of Attention Disorders · doi:10.1177/10870547221112948
Mallinas, S. R., Kievit, D. L., & Plant, E. A. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104489
Carvings in stone: design research for public health investigations in the age of COVID-19
Mages, M. A., Chehade, E. C., Carr, S. J., Kim, M., Mello, S., Thomas, M., & Yang, Y. (2023) · Design for Health · doi:10.1080/24735132.2023.2231167
Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, I., & Rodríguez, J. (2022) · UMA Editorial eBooks · doi:10.24310/mumaedmumaed.111
Sureka, S. K. (2022) · doi:10.31274/td-20240329-803
Metadata
- Authors
- Arechar, A. A., & Rand, D. G.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (MX)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Arechar, Antonio A.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2021-05-07
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2591-2595
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- PMC
- PMC8103881
- OpenAlex
- W3157385754
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 19
- FWCI
- 19.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Keywords
- Amazon Mechanical Turk, COVID-19 pandemic, social distancing, digital labour markets, participant diversity, demographic representation, cognitive reflection, analytic cognitive style, gender, ethnicity, political preferences
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Attention, Humans, Social Sciences, United States, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review