The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
Intention—Behavior Relations: A Conceptual and Empirical Review
Sheeran, P. (2002) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772143000003 · Cited by 3,688
The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.
Gifford, R. (2011) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0023566 · Cited by 2,326
Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them
Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020) · Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/2515245920952393 · Cited by 969
Inequality, communication, and the avoidance of disastrous climate change in a public goods game
Tavoni, A., Dannenberg, A., Kallis, G., & Löschel, A. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1102493108 · Cited by 497
Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L., & Capaldi, C. A. (2015) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005 · Cited by 428
Comparison of self-reported recycling attitudes and behaviors with actual behavior
Barker, K., Fong, L., Grossman, S., Quin, C., & Reid, R. (1994) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.571 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Addressing climate change with behavioral science: A global intervention tournament in 63 countries
Vlasceanu, M., Doell, K. C., Bak-Coleman, J. B., Todorova, B., Berkebile-Weinberg, M. M., Grayson, S. J., Patel, Y., Goldwert, D., Pei, Y., Chakroff, A., et al. (2024) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adj5778 · Cited by 269
Self-citationA network approach to climate change anxiety and its key related features
Heeren, A., Mouguiama-Daouda, C., & McNally, R. J. (2023) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102625 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Lange, F.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods
- Published
- 2022-03-30
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 600-622
- ISSN
- 1554-351X (ISSN-L)
- 1554-3528
- OpenAlex
- W4221057451
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 4.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/s13428-022-01825-4
- The paper
- Lange, F. (2022). Behavioral paradigms for studying pro-environmental behavior: A systematic review. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01825-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
