Cited by 25Healthcare Systems and TechnologyTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Cost savings associated with electronic specialty consultations

Melanie D Whittington, P Michael Ho, Susan R Kirsh, Rachael R Kenney, Jeffrey Todd-Stenberg, David H. Au, Joseph Simonetti·2021·The American Journal of Managed Care

Abstract

Objectives Electronic consultations, or e-consults, between primary care providers and specialists have been shown to improve access to specialty care, shorten wait times, and reduce outpatient visits. The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between patients who received an electronic specialty consultation and patients who received a face-to-face specialty consultation. Study design Retrospective cohort evaluation of patients who received a specialty consultation in the Veterans Health Administration during 2016. Methods Patients who received an e-consult were matched 1:1 to patients who received a face-to-face consultation using propensity scores. Total, outpatient, and inpatient health care costs over 3 and 6 months following the specialty consultation were compared using a generalized linear model with a gamma distribution and log link. Results e-Consults accounted for 1.8% (urology) to 9.6% (hematology) of specialty consultations, on average. Across 11 specialties, patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower health care costs compared with patients receiving a face-to-face consultation, ranging from 3.6% (cardiology) to 30.7% (hematology) lower. This was largely driven by differences in outpatient costs. Patients receiving an e-consult had significantly lower outpatient costs for all specialties except cardiology, ranging from 6.9% (endocrinology) to 31.2% (hematology) lower. Three-month inpatient costs among those who rec…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88579

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whittington, M. D., Ho, P. M., Kirsh, S. R., Kenney, R. R., Todd-Stenberg, J., Au, D. H., & Simonetti, J.
Affiliations
Veterans Health Administration (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Managed Care
Published
2021-01-14
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
e16-e23
ISSN
  • 1088-0224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2692
OpenAlex
W3123139229
Cited by
25
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Managed Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
e-consultation, health care costs, outpatient costs, hospital costs, face-to-face consultation, Veterans Health Administration, access to specialist care, healthcare resource utilization
MeSH terms
Electronics, Humans, Medicine, Retrospective Studies, Cost Savings, Remote Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review