Costs for commercially insured adults prescribed second-line diabetes medications
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in health care costs associated with choice of second-line antidiabetes medication (ADM) for commercially insured adults with type 2 diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with multiple pretests and posttests. METHODS: Included patients initiated second-line ADM therapy between 2011 and 2015, with variable follow-up through 2017. The 6 index medication classes were sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), basal insulin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs). Multivariable regression models compared between-class changes in adjusted quarterly costs after second-line ADM initiation. RESULTS: The study cohort included 34,963 adults. Most were prescribed a sulfonylurea (46.0%) or DPP-4 inhibitor (30.4%). Adjusted quarterly index medication costs were significantly higher for all patients receiving nonsulfonylurea medications, ranging from $108 (95% CI, $99-$118) for TZDs to $742 (95% CI, $720-$765) for GLP-1 RAs. Changes in quarterly total health care costs were significantly higher for all nonsulfonylurea classes. Conversely, changes in quarterly nonpharmacy medical costs were significantly lower for patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors (-$67; 95% CI, -$92 to -$43), GLP-1 RAs (-$43; 95% CI, -$85 to -$1), and SGLT-2 inhibitors (-$46; 95% CI, -$87 to -$6); changes in all other quarterly costs besides the index medication were significantly lower for patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors (-$60; 95% CI, -$94 to -$26) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (-$113; 95% CI, -$169 to -$57). CONCLUSIONS: The higher cost of nonsulfonylurea medications was the main driver of relative increases in total costs. Relative decreases in nonpharmacy medical costs among patients receiving newer ADM classes reflect these medications' potential value.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SGLT2i and GLP1ra medications are expensive, with median retail prices ranging from $300 to $942 per month.
“As with other patented drugs, these novel medications are expensive with median retail prices ranging from $300 to $942 per month.18–20”
From Disparities in Use of Novel Diabetes Medications by Insurance: A Nationally Representative Cohort Study (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wang, H., Cordiner, R. L. M., Huang, Y., Donnelly, L. A., Hapca, S. M., Collier, A., McKnight, J. A., Kennon, B., Gibb, F. W., McKeigue, P., et al. (2023) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc22-1238 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
“Mean (SD) 134 (15) 134 (15) 134 (15) 134 (15) 134 (15)”
BackgroundEmulating the GRADE trial using real world data: retrospective comparative effectiveness study
Deng, Y., Polley, E. C., Wallach, J. D., Dhruva, S. S., Herrin, J. S., Quinto, K., Gandotra, C., Crown, W. H., Noseworthy, P. A., Yao, X., et al. (2022) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-070717 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Bepo, L., Nguyen, O. K., & Makam, A. N. (2024) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-024-08961-x · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“20 Thus, insurance plans may implement policies to restrict medication access and contain costs, including patient cost-sharing and formulary restrictions, prior authorization, and step therapy requirements.”
Social Needs Identified by Diagnostic Codes in Privately Insured U.S. Adults
Liss, D. T., Cherupally, M., Kang, R. H., Aikman, C., Cooper, A. J., & O'Brien, M. J. (2022) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2022.07.009 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationAssociation Between ICD-10 Codes for Social Needs and Subsequent Emergency and Inpatient Use
Liss, D. T., Kang, R. H., Cherupally, M., Cooper, A., Barreto-Parra, P.-N., Aikman, C., & O’Brien, M. J. (2023) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001948 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Liss, D. T., Kang, R. H., Lancki, N., O'Brien, M. J., Wallia, A., Cooper, A. J., Harris, S. A., Parker, E. D., & Ackermann, R. T.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- ORCID
- Ronald T. Ackermann
- Venue
- The American Journal of Managed Care
- Published
- 2021-03-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e72-e79
- ISSN
- 1088-0224 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2692
- OpenAlex
- W3138551011
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Managed Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, health care costs, commercially insured adults, sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, basal insulin, SGLT2 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones
- MeSH terms
- Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Retrospective Studies, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review