Cited by 5Diabetes Treatment and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDiabetes Management and Research

Costs for commercially insured adults prescribed second-line diabetes medications

David T Liss, Raymond H Kang, Nicola Lancki, Matthew J O'Brien, Amisha Wallia, Andrew J Cooper, Sterling A Harris, Emily D Parker +1 more·2021·The American Journal of Managed Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in health care costs associated with choice of second-line antidiabetes medication (ADM) for commercially insured adults with type 2 diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study with multiple pretests and posttests. METHODS: Included patients initiated second-line ADM therapy between 2011 and 2015, with variable follow-up through 2017. The 6 index medication classes were sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), basal insulin, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, and thiazolidinediones (TZDs). Multivariable regression models compared between-class changes in adjusted quarterly costs after second-line ADM initiation. RESULTS: The study cohort included 34,963 adults. Most were prescribed a sulfonylurea (46.0%) or DPP-4 inhibitor (30.4%). Adjusted quarterly index medication costs were significantly higher for all patients receiving nonsulfonylurea medications, ranging from $108 (95% CI, $99-$118) for TZDs to $742 (95% CI, $720-$765) for GLP-1 RAs. Changes in quarterly total health care costs were significantly higher for all nonsulfonylurea classes. Conversely, changes in quarterly nonpharmacy medical costs were significantly lower for patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors (-$67; 95% CI, -$92 to -$43), GLP-1 RAs (-$43; 95% CI, -$85 to -$1), and SGLT-2 inhibitors (-$46; 95% CI, -$87 to -$6); changes in all other quarterly costs besides the index medication were significantly lower for patients receiving DPP-4 inhibitors (-$60; 95% CI, -$94 to -$26) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (-$113; 95% CI, -$169 to -$57). CONCLUSIONS: The higher cost of nonsulfonylurea medications was the main driver of relative increases in total costs. Relative decreases in nonpharmacy medical costs among patients receiving newer ADM classes reflect these medications' potential value.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37765/ajmc.2021.88601

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liss, D. T., Kang, R. H., Lancki, N., O'Brien, M. J., Wallia, A., Cooper, A. J., Harris, S. A., Parker, E. D., & Ackermann, R. T.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Managed Care
Published
2021-03-09
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
e72-e79
ISSN
  • 1088-0224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2692
OpenAlex
W3138551011
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Managed Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, health care costs, commercially insured adults, sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, basal insulin, SGLT2 inhibitors, thiazolidinediones
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Retrospective Studies, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review