The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application.
Open accessAbstract
Progress in the development of animal models for/stroke, spinal cord injury, and other neurodegenerative disease requires tests of high sensitivity to elaborate distinct aspects of motor function and to determine even subtle loss of movement capacity. To enhance efficacy and resolution of testing, tests should permit qualitative and quantitative measures of motor function and be sensitive to changes in performance during recovery periods. The present study describes a new task to assess skilled walking in the rat to measure both forelimb and hindlimb function at the same time. Animals are required to walk along a horizontal ladder on which the spacing of the rungs is variable and is periodically changed. Changes in rung spacing prevent animals from learning the absolute and relative location of the rungs and so minimize the ability of the animals to compensate for impairments through learning. In addition, changing the spacing between the rungs allows the test to be used repeatedly in long-term studies. Methods are described for both quantitative and qualitative description of both fore- and hindlimb performance, including limb placing, stepping, co-ordination. Furthermore, use of compensatory strategies is indicated by missteps or compensatory steps in response to another limb's misplacement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Li, L., Zhang, Y., Mu, J., Chen, J., Zhang, C., Cao, H., & Gao, J. (2020) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00929 · Cited by 404
Divergent transcriptional regulation of astrocyte reactivity across disorders
Burda, J. E., O’Shea, T. M., Ao, Y., Suresh, K. B., Wang, S., Bernstein, A. M., Chandra, A., Deverasetty, S., Kawaguchi, R., Kim, J. H., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04739-5 · Cited by 164
Fluoxetine treatment promotes functional recovery in a rat model of cervical spinal cord injury
Scali, M., Begenisic, T., Mainardi, M., Milanese, M., Bonifacino, T., Bonanno, G., Sale, A., & Maffei, L. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02217 · Cited by 25
Zepeda, R., Contreras, V., Pissani, C., Stack, K., Vargas, M., Owen, G. I., Lazo, O. M., & Bronfman, F. C. (2016) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2016.03.011 · Cited by 22
Frederick, R. A., Troyk, P. R., & Cogan, S. F. (2021) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ac2bb8 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Metz, G. A., & Whishaw, I. Q.
- Venue
- Journal of Visualized Experiments
- Publisher
- MyJove Corporation
- Published
- 2009-06-11
- Issue
- 28
- ISSN
- 1940-087X (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.3791/1204
- OpenAlex
- W2010853947
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3791/1204
- The paper
- Metz, G. A., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2009). The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application. Journal of Visualized Experiments. https://doi.org/10.3791/1204
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.