The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use and safety of KAATSU training:Results of a national survey
Open accessAbstract
KAATSU training is a novel training, which is performed under conditions of restricted blood flow. It can induce a variety of beneficial effects such as increased muscle strength, and it has been adopted by a number of facilities in recent times. The purpose of the present study is to know the present state of KAATSU training in Japan and examine the incidence of adverse events in the field. The data were obtained from KAATSU leaders or instructors in a total of 105 out of 195 facilities where KAATSU training has been adopted. Based on survey results, 12,642 persons have received KAATSU training (male 45.4%, female 54.6%). KAATSU training has been applied to all generations of people including the young (<20 years old) and the elderly (>80 years old). The most popular purpose of KAATSU training is to strengthen muscle in athletes and to promote the health of subjects, including the elderly. It has been also applied to various kinds of physical conditions, cerebrovascular diseases, orthopedic diseases, obesity, cardiac diseases, neuromuscular diseases, diabetes, hypertension and respiratory diseases. In KAATSU training, various types of exercise modalities (physical exercise, walking, cycling, and weight training) are used. Most facilities have used 5-30 min KAATSU training each time, and performed it 1-3 times a week. Approximately 80% of the facilities are satisfied with the results of KAATSU training with only small numbers of complications reported. The incidence of side effects was as follows; venous thrombus (0.055%), pulmonary embolism (0.008%) and rhabdomyolysis (0.008%). These results indicate that the KAATSU training is a safe and promising method for training athletes and healthy persons, and can also be applied to persons with various physical conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Blood Flow Restriction Exercise: Considerations of Methodology, Application, and Safety
Patterson, S. D., Hughes, L., Warmington, S., Burr, J., Scott, B. R., Owens, J., Abe, T., Nielsen, J. L., Libardi, C. A., Laurentino, G., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Physiology · doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00533 · Cited by 917
Centner, C., Wiegel, P., Gollhofer, A., & König, D. (2019) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0994-1 · Cited by 382
Blood Flow Restricted Exercise and Skeletal Muscle Health
Manini, T. M., & Clark, B. C. (2009) · Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1097/jes.0b013e31819c2e5c · Cited by 296
Potential safety issues with blood flow restriction training
Loenneke, J. P., Wilson, J. M., Wilson, G. J., Pujol, T. J., & Bemben, M. G. (2011) · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01290.x · Cited by 275
Blood Flow Restricted Exercise and Vascular Function
Horiuchi, M., & Okita, K. (2012) · International Journal of Vascular Medicine · doi:10.1155/2012/543218 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakajima, T., Kurano, M., Iida, H., Takano, H., Oonuma, H., Morita, T., Meguro, K., Sato, Y., Nagata, T., & KAATSU Training Group
- Venue
- International Journal of KAATSU Training Research
- Publisher
- Japan Kaatsu Training Society
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-13
- ISSN
- 1349-4562 (ISSN-L)
- 1882-6628
- OpenAlex
- W2149611688
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use and safety of KAATSU training:Results of a national survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3806/ijktr.2.5
- The paper
- Nakajima, T., Kurano, M., Iida, H., Takano, H., Oonuma, H., Morita, T., Meguro, K., Sato, Y., Nagata, T., & KAATSU Training Group. (2006). Use and safety of KAATSU training:Results of a national survey. International Journal of KAATSU Training Research. https://doi.org/10.3806/ijktr.2.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.