The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comprehensive Review of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Feature Selection and Feature Extraction
Open accessAbstract
Due to sharp increases in data dimensions, working on every data mining or machine learning (ML) task requires more efficient techniques to get the desired results. Therefore, in recent years, researchers have proposed and developed many methods and techniques to reduce the high dimensions of data and to attain the required accuracy. To ameliorate the accuracy of learning features as well as to decrease the training time dimensionality reduction is used as a pre-processing step, which can eliminate irrelevant data, noise, and redundant features. Dimensionality reduction (DR) has been performed based on two main methods, which are feature selection (FS) and feature extraction (FE). FS is considered an important method because data is generated continuously at an ever-increasing rate; some serious dimensionality problems can be reduced with this method, such as decreasing redundancy effectively, eliminating irrelevant data, and ameliorating result comprehensibility. Moreover, FE transacts with the problem of finding the most distinctive, informative, and decreased set of features to ameliorate the efficiency of both the processing and storage of data. This paper offers a comprehensive approach to FS and FE in the scope of DR. Moreover, the details of each paper, such as used algorithms/approaches, datasets, classifiers, and achieved results are comprehensively analyzed and summarized. Besides, a systematic discussion of all of the reviewed methods to highlight authors' trends, determining the method(s) has been done, which significantly reduced computational time, and selecting the most accurate classifiers. As a result, the different types of both methods have been discussed and analyzed the findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Potential of fecal microbiota for early-stage detection of colorectal cancer
Zeller, G., Tap, J., Voigt, A. Y., Sunagawa, S., Kultima, J. R., Costea, P. I., Amiot, A., Böhm, J., Brunetti, F., Habermann, N., et al. (2014) · Molecular Systems Biology · doi:10.15252/msb.20145645 · Cited by 1,375
The human gut microbiome as a screening tool for colorectal cancer
Zackular, J. P., Rogers, M. A. M., Ruffin, M. T., & Schloss, P. D. (2014) · Cancer Prevention Research · doi:10.1158/1940-6207.capr-14-0129 · Cited by 551
Cited by
Classification Based on Decision Tree Algorithm for Machine Learning
Charbuty, B., & Abdulazeez, A. (2021) · Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends · doi:10.38094/jastt20165 · Cited by 1,871
Self-citationFeature dimensionality reduction: a review
Jia, W., Sun, M., Lian, J., & Hou, S. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00637-x · Cited by 797
RTIDS: A Robust Transformer-Based Approach for Intrusion Detection System
Wu, Z., Zhang, H., Wang, P., & Sun, Z. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3182333 · Cited by 317
Naz, S., Butt, S. A., ul Hassan, M. M., Escorcia-Gutierrez, J., Fatima, A., & ul Ain, F. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2024.128615 · Cited by 17
Carratù, M., Gallo, V., Dello Iacono, S., Sommella, P., Ciani, L., & Patrizi, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3502814 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Zebari, R., Abdulazeez, A., Zeebaree, D., Zebari, D., & Saeed, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends
- Published
- 2020-05-15
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-70
- ISSN
- 2708-0757 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3024333932
- Cited by
- 918
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 37.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comprehensive Review of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Feature Selection and Feature Extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38094/jastt1224
- The paper
- Zebari, R., Abdulazeez, A., Zeebaree, D., Zebari, D., & Saeed, J. (2020). A Comprehensive Review of Dimensionality Reduction Techniques for Feature Selection and Feature Extraction. Journal of Applied Science and Technology Trends. https://doi.org/10.38094/jastt1224
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.