Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 447

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Anterior Wall Versus Inferior Wall ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study

Open access
Subedi, Aabishkar, Kumar Yadav, Birendra, Lamichhane, Sharmila, Maan Shrestha, Shekhar, Dahal, Reshma, Yadav, Sunil, Dhungana, Animesh, Karki, Manish·2024·International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
DOI 10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24aug1285
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition affecting many individuals worldwide, posing significant risks to patient health and outcomes. Different types of STEMI, such as anterior wall and inferior wall STEMI, can lead to varying in-hospital outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Understanding these differences is crucial for improving patient care and treatment strategies. This study aimed to compare the in-hospital outcomes of anterior and inferior wall STEMI in patients undergoing PCI at a tertiary care center.  Methods This descriptive cross-sectional study included 70 patients who underwent PCI for either Anterior or inferior wall STEMI at Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital ( CMCTH) and were admitted to the Critical Care Unit (CCU) from February 5th 2021 to March 4th 2022. Anterior wall or inferior wall STEMI was diagnosed using a surface Electrocardiogram (ECG) and in-hospital outcomes were recorded using structured Proforma. Data was entered and analyzed with SPSS-26.  Results Among the 70 patients included in the study, the mean age was 64.50 ± 9.818 years. The majority (77.1%) of patients were male and 22.9% of the patients were female. Among the patients of anterior wall MI who underwent PCI, 11 patients (15.7%) had cardiogenic shock, 21 patients (30.0%) had AKI, 2 patients (2.9%) had CVA, and 2 patients (2.9%) had death.  Conclusion Patients with anterior wall STEMI following PCI had worse in-hospital outcomes compared to those with inferior wall STEMI.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24aug1285

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

See all 447

Metadata

Authors
Subedi, A., Kumar Yadav, B., Lamichhane, S., Maan Shrestha, S., Dahal, R., Yadav, S., Dhungana, A., & Karki, M.
Venue
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Published
2024-09-13
Pages
2403-2407
ISSN
2456-2165 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24aug1285
OpenAlex
W4402525333
Cited by
447
References
54
FWCI
120.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Anterior Wall Versus Inferior Wall ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24aug1285
The paper
Subedi, A., Kumar Yadav, B., Lamichhane, S., Maan Shrestha, S., Dahal, R., Yadav, S., Dhungana, A., & Karki, M. (2024). Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes of Anterior Wall Versus Inferior Wall ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24aug1285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.