Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,552

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ethnobotanical Studies of Reputed Aphrodisiac Plants Used in Traditional Medicine in Haut-Katanga in DR of Congo

Open access
Otete François, Dikala, Kihuya Eddy, Ngoy, Mwinensenge James, Maloba, Kitambala Marsi, Mbayo, Kabeya Justin, Kanda, Ebalantshim Daniel, Munakongo, Ilunga Eddy, Mbuyu, Mutombo Emery, Kalonda, Jean-Baptiste, Lumbu Simbi, Chiribagula Valentin, Bashige, Muya Richard, Kalunga, Ndjovu Jules, Lohele·2024·International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)

Abstract

The goal of this study is to identify the plants used to treat sexual dysfunction in Haut-Katanga (DRC). Since most couples in sexual distress believe that resolving sexual dysfunction (SD) is the key to happiness, an ethnobotanical survey using a questionnaire guide was conducted among 36 traditional practitioners in four sites in Haut-Katanga province, including Lubumbashi, the provincial capital. The survey identified 52 species of aphrodisiac plants that are used to treat SD. Of these, 51 have been scientifically identified; they belong to 45 different genera and are contained in 28 families, with the Fabaceae having the highest representation (15.7%). These species are employed singly or in combination to prepare eighty recipes; the most common plant organ was the root bark (63%) in these recipes. Aqueous decoction (44%) and oral administration (75.3%) are the most commonly used routes of drug preparation and administration. Nearly 80 additional indications for the same plant species were discovered to be employed, such as sexually transmitted infections (7.17%), diabetes (3.69%), and hemorrhoids (4.07%). For every species, the Informant Consensus Factor (ICF) was determined. The plants with higher values (ICF≥0.17) included Bersama abyssinica Fres, Garcinia huillensis Welw, Cassia petersiana Bolle, Chenopodium album L, Clerodendrum capitatum (Willd) Schumach, Dialiopsis africana Radlk., Albizia adianthifolia (Schum.) W. Wight, and Crossopteryx febrifuga Mull.Arg.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24may2042

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,552

Metadata

Authors
Otete François, D., Kihuya Eddy, N., Mwinensenge James, M., Kitambala Marsi, M., Kabeya Justin, K., Ebalantshim Daniel, M., Ilunga Eddy, M., Mutombo Emery, K., Jean-Baptiste, L. S., Chiribagula Valentin, B., Muya Richard, K., & Ndjovu Jules, L.
Venue
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
Published
2024-06-19
Pages
3317-3334
ISSN
2456-2165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399809023
Cited by
1,552
References
0
FWCI
345.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethnobotanical Studies of Reputed Aphrodisiac Plants Used in Traditional Medicine in Haut-Katanga in DR of Congo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24may2042
The paper
Otete François, D., Kihuya Eddy, N., Mwinensenge James, M., Kitambala Marsi, M., Kabeya Justin, K., Ebalantshim Daniel, M., Ilunga Eddy, M., Mutombo Emery, K., Jean-Baptiste, L. S., Chiribagula Valentin, B., Muya Richard, K., & Ndjovu Jules, L. (2024). Ethnobotanical Studies of Reputed Aphrodisiac Plants Used in Traditional Medicine in Haut-Katanga in DR of Congo. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24may2042

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.