Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Response of Broiler Chickens to Three Different Energy Source Feedstuffs

Open access
A. S., Sulaiman,, N. B., Rano,, Abdullahi., H. I., R., Dhakar,, A. S., Barde,·2024·International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
DOI 10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul049
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to determine the effect of different energy sources in starter diet on broiler chicks. Methodology: The study was conducted at the Poultry Unit of the Teaching and Research Farm of the Department of Animal Health and Production, Binyaminu Usman Polytechnic, Hadejia, Jigawa State, Nigeria. A total of seventy-two (72) unsexed broiler birds were sourced from accredited Chikun Company Hadejia metropolis, Jigawa State. The birds were raised under intensive management system (on a floor pens). Three different diets (containing different energy sources) designated as Treatments 1, 2, and 3 for maize, sorghum and millet, respectively were used in this experiment. The parameters measured were the growth performance, haematological indices, proximate composition of the experimental diets and economic analysis. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance using SAS package. Results: The growth performance, haematological indices and economic analysis showed non-significant (p>0.05) differences despite numerical variation that exist among the treatment groups. The different energy sources did not significantly affect the performance parameters measured. The reason for this was not clearly understood, however, numerically, some of the performance indices tended to be positively affected by the different diet and the broiler performance analysed were within the normal range. Conclusion: Based on the economic analysis, millet is recommended being the cheapest in terms of feed cost and feed cost per weight of bird.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul049

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 734

Metadata

Authors
A. S., S., N. B., R., Abdullahi., H. I., R., D., & A. S., B.
Venue
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Published
2024-07-23
Pages
541-546
ISSN
2456-2165 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul049
OpenAlex
W4400929582
Cited by
734
References
18
FWCI
186.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response of Broiler Chickens to Three Different Energy Source Feedstuffs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul049
The paper
A. S., S., N. B., R., Abdullahi., H. I., R., D., & A. S., B. (2024). Response of Broiler Chickens to Three Different Energy Source Feedstuffs. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul049

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.