Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 734

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Utilization of Differently Processed Sesame Seed Meal as a Source of Methionine in Guinea Fowls Diets

Open access
A. S., Sulaiman,, N. B., Rano,, H. A., Muhammad,, R., Dhakar,, P. K., Teli,·2024·International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
DOI 10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul207
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of different processing methods on sesame seeds meal as a source of methionine for guinea fowls. The research took place at the Teaching and Research Farm of the Department of Animal Health and Production in Jigawa State, Nigeria. Seventy-two guinea fowls of mixed sexes were raised under intensive management conditions for the experiment. Sesame seeds were divided into three groups: raw, soaked, and roasted, then ground into meal and incorporated into four experimental diets. Proximate analysis of the experimental diets was conducted at the Nutrition laboratory of the Department of Animal Science. Data generated were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using statistical analysis system (SAS) package. Results indicated that processing methods significantly reduced anti-nutritional factors without adverse effects on some of the performance parameters. Performance improved with all processed sesame seed meals compared to the control diet, suggesting their potential as methionine sources without additional supplementation. Raw, soaked, and roasted sesame seed meal can be incorporated at 15% level of inclusion in the diet of guinea fowls without negative impacts on their general performance. Overall, the study concludes that processing methods enhanced sesame seed's suitability as a methionine source for guinea fowls and recommends their inclusion in diets of guinea fowls at 15% level.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul207

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

See all 734

Metadata

Authors
A. S., S., N. B., R., H. A., M., R., D., & P. K., T.
Venue
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
Publisher
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
Published
2024-07-19
Pages
324-331
ISSN
2456-2165 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul207
OpenAlex
W4400827986
Cited by
734
References
23
FWCI
186.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
diamond

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utilization of Differently Processed Sesame Seed Meal as a Source of Methionine in Guinea Fowls Diets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul207
The paper
A. S., S., N. B., R., H. A., M., R., D., & P. K., T. (2024). Utilization of Differently Processed Sesame Seed Meal as a Source of Methionine in Guinea Fowls Diets. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24jul207

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.