Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 419

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GAPIT Version 2: An Enhanced Integrated Tool for Genomic Association and Prediction

Open access
Tang, You, Liu, Xiaolei, Wang, Jiabo, Li, Meng, Wang, Qishan, Tian, Feng, Su, Zhongbin, Pan, Yuchun, Liu, Di, Lipka, Alexander E., Buckler, Edward S., Zhang, Zhiwu·2016·The Plant Genome

Abstract

Most human diseases and agriculturally important traits are complex. Dissecting their genetic architecture requires continued development of innovative and powerful statistical methods. Corresponding advances in computing tools are critical to efficiently use these statistical innovations and to enhance and accelerate biomedical and agricultural research and applications. The genome association and prediction integrated tool (GAPIT) was first released in 2012 and became widely used for genome‐wide association studies (GWAS) and genomic prediction. The GAPIT implemented computationally efficient statistical methods, including the compressed mixed linear model (CMLM) and genomic prediction by using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP). New state‐of‐the‐art statistical methods have now been implemented in a new, enhanced version of GAPIT. These methods include factored spectrally transformed linear mixed models (FaST‐LMM), enriched CMLM (ECMLM), FaST‐LMM‐Select, and settlement of mixed linear models under progressively exclusive relationship (SUPER). The genomic prediction methods implemented in this new release of the GAPIT include gBLUP based on CMLM, ECMLM, and SUPER. Additionally, the GAPIT was updated to improve its existing output display features and to add new data display and evaluation functions, including new graphing options and capabilities, phenotype simulation, power analysis, and cross‐validation. These enhancements make the GAPIT a valuable resource for determining appropriate experimental designs and performing GWAS and genomic prediction. The enhanced R‐based GAPIT software package uses state‐of‐the‐art methods to conduct GWAS and genomic prediction. The GAPIT also provides new functions for developing experimental designs and creating publication‐ready tabular summaries and graphs to improve the efficiency and application of genomic research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3835/plantgenome2015.11.0120

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 419

Metadata

Authors
Tang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, J., Li, M., Wang, Q., Tian, F., Su, Z., Pan, Y., Liu, D., Lipka, A. E., Buckler, E. S., & Zhang, Z.
Venue
The Plant Genome
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-07
Volume
9
Issue
2
ISSN
1940-3372 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313931749
Cited by
419
References
7
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GAPIT Version 2: An Enhanced Integrated Tool for Genomic Association and Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3835/plantgenome2015.11.0120
The paper
Tang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, J., Li, M., Wang, Q., Tian, F., Su, Z., Pan, Y., Liu, D., Lipka, A. E., Buckler, E. S., & Zhang, Z. (2016). GAPIT Version 2: An Enhanced Integrated Tool for Genomic Association and Prediction. The Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2015.11.0120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.