The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NOMINAL VALUES FOR SELECTED SOLAR AND PLANETARY QUANTITIES: IAU 2015 RESOLUTION B3* †
Open accessAbstract
In this brief communication we provide the rationale for and the outcome of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) resolution vote at the XXIXth General Assembly in Honolulu, Hawaii, in 2015, on recommended nominal conversion constants for selected solar and planetary properties. The problem addressed by the resolution is a lack of established conversion constants between solar and planetary values and SI units: a missing standard has caused a proliferation of solar values (e.g., solar radius, solar irradiance, solar luminosity, solar effective temperature, and solar mass parameter) in the literature, with cited solar values typically based on best estimates at the time of paper writing. As precision of observations increases, a set of consistent values becomes increasingly important. To address this, an IAU Working Group on Nominal Units for Stellar and Planetary Astronomy formed in 2011, uniting experts from the solar, stellar, planetary, exoplanetary, and fundamental astronomy, as well as from general standards fields to converge on optimal values for nominal conversion constants. The effort resulted in the IAU 2015 Resolution B3, passed at the IAU General Assembly by a large majority. The resolution recommends the use of nominal solar and planetary values, which are by definition exact and are expressed in SI units. These nominal values should be understood as conversion factors only, not as the true solar/planetary properties or current best estimates. Authors and journal editors are urged to join in using the standard values set forth by this resolution in future work and publications to help minimize further confusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition
Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. (2008) · doi:10.1515/9781400828722 · Cited by 4,375 · cited 1×
“Along with it, IAU 2015 Resolution B2 adopted the definition of the parsec to be exactly 648,000/π au (Binney & Tremaine 2008; see also Cox 2000).”
MethodMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA)
Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., Herwig, F., Lesaffre, P., & Timmes, F. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3 · Cited by 4,360
Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., Bildsten, L., Brown, E. F., Dotter, A., Mankovich, C., Montgomery, M. H., Stello, D., Timmes, F. X., et al. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4 · Cited by 3,549
Self-citationMODULES FOR EXPERIMENTS IN STELLAR ASTROPHYSICS (MESA): BINARIES, PULSATIONS, AND EXPLOSIONS
Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., Bildsten, L., Cantiello, M., Dessart, L., Farmer, R., Hu, H., Langer, N., et al. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 · Cited by 3,204
MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cantiello, M., Paxton, B., & Johnson, B. D. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 · Cited by 2,922
Allen’s Astrophysical Quantities
(2002) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1186-0 · Cited by 1,727
Accurate masses and radii of normal stars: modern results and applications
Torres, G., Andersen, J., & Giménez, A. (2010) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1 · Cited by 1,418
Self-citationModules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA)
Paxton, B. (2026) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.19685576 · Cited by 1,411
A new, lower value of total solar irradiance: Evidence and climate significance: FRONTIER
Kopp, G., & Lean, J. L. (2011) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2010gl045777 · Cited by 1,049
Self-citationCODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2006
Mohr, P. J., Taylor, B. N., & Newell, D. B. (2008) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.80.633 · Cited by 952
Cited by
The Absolute Magnitude of the Sun in Several Filters
Willmer, C. N. A. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aabfdf · Cited by 417
BIPM, Wielgosz, R., Forgan, B., WMO, del Campo Maldonado, D., CEM, Rea, A., WMO, Woolliams, E., NPL, et al. (2023) · doi:10.59161/rapport202303 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Prša, A., Harmanec, P., Torres, G., Mamajek, E., Asplund, M., Capitaine, N., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Depagne, É., Haberreiter, M., Hekker, S., Hilton, J., Kopp, G., Kostov, V., Kurtz, D. W., Laskar, J., Mason, B. D., Milone, E. F., Montgomery, M., Richards, M., Schmutz, W., Schou, J., & Stewart, S. G.
- Venue
- The Astronomical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-08-01
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 41
- ISSN
- 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-3881
- OpenAlex
- W2409447747
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NOMINAL VALUES FOR SELECTED SOLAR AND PLANETARY QUANTITIES: IAU 2015 RESOLUTION B3* †. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41
- The paper
- Prša, A., Harmanec, P., Torres, G., Mamajek, E., Asplund, M., Capitaine, N., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Depagne, É., Haberreiter, M., Hekker, S., Hilton, J., Kopp, G., Kostov, V., Kurtz, D. W., Laskar, J., Mason, B. D., Milone, E. F., Montgomery, M., Richards, M., . . . Stewart, S. G. (2016). NOMINAL VALUES FOR SELECTED SOLAR AND PLANETARY QUANTITIES: IAU 2015 RESOLUTION B3* †. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/152/2/41
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.