The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EATING HABITS OF MILKY WAY-MASS HALOS: DESTROYED DWARF SATELLITES AND THE METALLICITY DISTRIBUTION OF ACCRETED STARS
Open accessAbstract
We study the mass spectrum of destroyed dwarfs that contribute to the accreted stellar mass of Milky Way (MW)-mass (M vir ∼ 10 12.1 M ⊙) halos using a suite of 45 zoom-in dissipationless simulations. Empirical models are employed to relate (peak) subhalo mass to dwarf stellar mass, and we use constraints from z = 0 observations and hydrodynamical simulations to estimate the metallicity distribution of the accreted stellar material. The dominant contributors to the accreted stellar mass are relatively massive dwarfs with M star ∼ 10 8–10 10 M ⊙. Halos with more quiescent accretion histories tend to have lower mass progenitors (10 8–10 9 M ⊙), and lower overall accreted stellar masses. Ultra-faint mass (M star < 10 5 M ⊙) dwarfs contribute a negligible amount (≪1%) to the accreted stellar mass and, despite having low average metallicities, supply a small fraction (∼2%–5%) of the very metal-poor stars with [Fe/H] < −2. Dwarfs with masses 10 5 < M star/M ⊙ < 10 8 provide a substantial amount of the very metal-poor stellar material (∼40%–80%), and even relatively metal-rich dwarfs with M star > 10 8 M ⊙ can contribute a considerable fraction (∼20%–60%) of metal-poor stars if their metallicity distributions have significant metal-poor tails. Finally, we find that the generic assumption of a quiescent assembly history for the MW halo seems to be in tension with the mass spectrum of its surviving dwarfs. We suggest that the MW could be a “transient fossil”; a quiescent halo with a recent accretion event(s) that disguises the preceding formation history of the halo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Statistical Properties of X‐Ray Clusters: Analytic and Numerical Comparisons
Bryan, G. L., & Norman, M. L. (1998) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305262 · Cited by 2,372
THE AVERAGE STAR FORMATION HISTORIES OF GALAXIES IN DARK MATTER HALOS FROM z = 0-8
Behroozi, P. S., Wechsler, R. H., & Conroy, C. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/1/57 · Cited by 2,167
Self-citationTHE OBSERVED PROPERTIES OF DWARF GALAXIES IN AND AROUND THE LOCAL GROUP
McConnachie, A. W. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/4 · Cited by 1,869
THE ROCKSTAR PHASE-SPACE TEMPORAL HALO FINDER AND THE VELOCITY OFFSETS OF CLUSTER CORES
Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., & Wu, H. (2012) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/762/2/109 · Cited by 1,694
Self-citationGADGET: a code for collisionless and gasdynamical cosmological simulations
Springel, V., Yoshida, N., & White, S. D. M. (2001) · New Astronomy · doi:10.1016/s1384-1076(01)00042-2 · Cited by 1,682
Hopkins, P. F., Kereš, D., Oñorbe, J., Faucher‐Giguère, C., Quataert, E., Murray, N., & Bullock, J. S. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1738 · Cited by 1,470
Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 · Cited by 1,431
The ages and metallicities of galaxies in the local universe
Gallazzi, A., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., White, S. D. M., & Tremonti, C. A. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09321.x · Cited by 1,212
Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., Maiolino, R., MARCONI, A., & Gnerucci, A. (2010) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x · Cited by 1,185
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Katz, D., Antoja, T., Romero-Gómez, M., Drimmel, R., Reylé, C., Seabroke, G. M., Soubiran, C., Babusiaux, C., Matteo, P. D., Figueras, F., et al. (2018) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832865 · Cited by 417
Evidence from the H3 Survey That the Stellar Halo Is Entirely Comprised of Substructure
Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., Bonaca, A., Johnson, B. D., 丁, Y.-S. 源. T., Caldwell, N., Zaritsky, D., & Cargile, P. A. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abaef4 · Cited by 449
The formation and assembly history of the Milky Way revealed by its globular cluster population
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Pfeffer, J. L., Reina-Campos, M., Crain, R. A., & Bastian, N. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1609 · Cited by 369
Kruijssen, J. M. D., Pfeffer, J. L., Chevance, M., Bonaca, A., Trujillo-Gomez, S., Bastian, N., Reina-Campos, M., Crain, R. A., & Hughes, M. E. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2452 · Cited by 252
“There is clear evidence that the accretion history of the Milky Way is atypical for a galaxy of its mass (e.g. Deason et al. 2016; Belokurov et al. 2018; Kruijssen et al. 2019b; Mackereth et al. 2019).”
BackgroundMonachesi, A., Gómez, F. A., Grand, R. J. J., Simpson, C. M., Kauffmann, G., Bustamante, S., Marinacci, F., Pakmor, R., Springel, V., Frenk, C. S., et al. (2019) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz538 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Deason, A. J., Mao, Y.-Y., & Wechsler, R. H.
- Affiliations
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Deason, Alis J.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-04-01
- Volume
- 821
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2256344593
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7
- FWCI
- 6.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (-AC02-05CH11231, 05CH11231, DE AC02 05CH11231, DE-AC02-)
- National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (DE–AC02–05CH11231, 05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231)
- Office of Science (DEAC02–05CH11231, AC02-05CH11231, DE-AC02, 05CH11231)
- SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory (DE-AC02-05-CH11231)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- Galactic halo, dwarf satellite galaxies, metallicity distribution, very metal-poor stars, halo assembly history, quiescent accretion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review