The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY NUMBER DENSITY AT z < 8 AND ITS IMPLICATIONS
Open accessAbstract
The evolution of the number density of galaxies in the universe, and thus also the total number of galaxies, is a fundamental question with implications for a host of astrophysical problems including galaxy evolution and cosmology. However, there has never been a detailed study of this important measurement, nor a clear path to answer it. To address this we use observed galaxy stellar mass functions up to z ∼ 8 to determine how the number densities of galaxies change as a function of time and mass limit. We show that the increase in the total number density of galaxies (ϕ T), more massive than M * = 10 6 M ⊙, decreases as ϕ T ∼ t −1, where t is the age of the universe. We further show that this evolution turns over and rather increases with time at higher mass lower limits of M * > 10 7 M ⊙. By using the M * = 10 6 M ⊙ lower limit we further show that the total number of galaxies in the universe up to z = 8 is (2 trillion), almost a factor of 10 higher than would be seen in an all sky survey at Hubble Ultra-Deep Field depth. We discuss the implications for these results for galaxy evolution, as well as compare our results with the latest models of galaxy formation. These results also reveal that the cosmic background light in the optical and near-infrared likely arise from these unobserved faint galaxies. We also show how these results solve the question of why the sky at night is dark, otherwise known as Olbers’ paradox.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE MAJOR AND MINOR GALAXY MERGER RATES AT z < 1.5
Lotz, J. M., Jonsson, P., Cox, T. J., Croton, D., Primack, J. R., Somerville, R. S., & Stewart, K. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/103 · Cited by 450
Cited by
Bacteria and archaea on Earth and their abundance in biofilms
Flemming, H.-C., & Wuertz, S. (2019) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-019-0158-9 · Cited by 1,729
Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere
Folke, C., Polasky, S., Rockström, J., Galaz, V., Westley, F., Lamont, M., Scheffer, M., Österblom, H., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., et al. (2021) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01544-8 · Cited by 696
Active galactic nuclei: what’s in a name?
Padovani, P., Alexander, D. M., Assef, R. J., De Marco, B., Giommi, P., Hickox, R. C., Richards, G. T., Smolčić, V., Hatziminaoglou, E., Mainieri, V., et al. (2017) · The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review · doi:10.1007/s00159-017-0102-9 · Cited by 666
Davidzon, I., Ilbert, O., Laigle, C., Coupon, J., McCracken, H. J., Delvecchio, I., Masters, D., Capak, P., Hsieh, B. C., Le Fèvre, O., et al. (2017) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730419 · Cited by 420
Harrison, T. M. (2020) · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46687-9 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Conselice, C. J., Wilkinson, A., Duncan, K., & Mortlock, A.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-10-14
- Volume
- 830
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2503239344
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY NUMBER DENSITY AT z < 8 AND ITS IMPLICATIONS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/0004-637x/830/2/83
- The paper
- Conselice, C. J., Wilkinson, A., Duncan, K., & Mortlock, A. (2016). THE EVOLUTION OF GALAXY NUMBER DENSITY AT z < 8 AND ITS IMPLICATIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637x/830/2/83
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.