The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PHOTOMETRIC SUPERNOVA CLASSIFICATION WITH MACHINE LEARNING
Open accessAbstract
Automated photometric supernova classification has become an active area of research in recent years in light of current and upcoming imaging surveys such as the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope, given that spectroscopic confirmation of type for all supernovae discovered will be impossible. Here, we develop a multi-faceted classification pipeline, combining existing and new approaches. Our pipeline consists of two stages: extracting descriptive features from the light curves and classification using a machine learning algorithm. Our feature extraction methods vary from model-dependent techniques, namely SALT2 fits, to more independent techniques that fit parametric models to curves, to a completely model-independent wavelet approach. We cover a range of representative machine learning algorithms, including naive Bayes,k-nearest neighbors, support vector machines, artificial neural networks, and boosted decision trees (BDTs). We test the pipeline on simulated multi-band DES light curves from the Supernova Photometric Classification Challenge. Using the commonly used area under the curve (AUC) of the Receiver Operating Characteristic as a metric, we find that the SALT2 fits and the wavelet approach, with the BDTs algorithm, each achieve an AUC of 0.98, where 1 represents perfect classification. We find that a representative training set is essential for good classification, whatever the feature set or algorithm, with implications for spectroscopic follow-up. Importantly, we find that by using either the SALT2 or the wavelet feature sets with a BDT algorithm, accurate classification is possible purely from light curve data, without the need for any redshift information.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Despite the small training set of a hundred data points, RNNs achieved state-of-the-art results compared with a combination of template fits and boosted decision trees (Lochner et al. 2016).”
From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Lochner et al. 2016
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Pan, S. J., & Yang, Q. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2009.191 · Cited by 23,387
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
LIII. On lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space
Pearson, K. (1901) · The London Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science · doi:10.1080/14786440109462720 · Cited by 12,864
Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components.
Hotelling, H. (1933) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0071325 · Cited by 9,691
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Comon, 1994, SigPr, 36, 287
- Cortes, 1995, Machine Learning, 20, 273
- Fawcett, 2004, Machine Learning, 31, 1
- Green, 1966, Society, 1, 521
- Kunz, 2007, PhRvD, 75
- Lo, 2009, 5:1
- Pedregosa, 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825
- Platt, 1999, Vol. 10, 61
- Sammon, 1969, ITCmp, 18, 401
- Van der Maaten, 2008, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 85
- Zhang, 2004, AA, 1, 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 201
Single-Epoch Supernova Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Kimura, A., Takahashi, I., Tanaka, M., Yasuda, N., Ueda, N., & Yoshida, N. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW) · doi:10.1109/icdcsw.2017.47 · Cited by 15
Classification of multiwavelength transients with machine learning
Sooknunan, K., Lochner, M., Bassett, B. A., Peiris, H. V., Fender, R. P., Stewart, A. J., Pietka, M., Woudt, P. A., McEwen, J. D., & Lahav, O. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3873 · Cited by 18
Self-citationDonoso-Oliva, C., Cabrera-Vives, G., Protopapas, P., Carrasco-Davis, R., & Estévez, P. A. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1598 · Cited by 13
The 6 × 2pt method: supernova velocities meet multiple tracers
Quartin, M., Amendola, L., & Moraes, B. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac571 · Cited by 14
Neira, M., Gómez, C., Suárez-Pérez, J. F., Gómez, D. A., Reyes, J. P., Hoyos, M. H., Arbeláez, P., & Forero-Romero, J. E. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aba267 · Cited by 14
Kembhavi, A. K., & Pattnaik, R. (2022) · Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s12036-022-09871-2 · Cited by 13
Kessler, R., Vincenzi, M., & Armstrong, P. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Letters · doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace34d · Cited by 13
Photometric classification of Hyper Suprime-Cam transients using machine learning
Takahashi, I., Suzuki, N., Yasuda, N., Kimura, A., Ueda, N., Tanaka, M., Tominaga, N., & Yoshida, N. (2020) · Nippon Tenmon Gakkai obun kenkyu hokoku · doi:10.1093/pasj/psaa082 · Cited by 10
Two Classes of Gamma-ray Bursts Distinguished within the First Second of Their Prompt Emission
Salmon, L., Hanlon, L., & Martin-Carrillo, A. (2022) · Galaxies · doi:10.3390/galaxies10040078 · Cited by 13
Segal, G., Parkinson, D., Norris, R. P., Hopkins, A., Andernach, H., Alexander, E., Carretti, E., Koribalski, B. S., Legodi, L. S., Leslie, S. K., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad537 · Cited by 13
Popovic, B., Scolnic, D., & Kessler, R. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6deb · Cited by 13
Bhavanam, S. R., Channappayya, S. S., Srijith, P. K., & Desai, S. (2024) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-024-04357-9 · Cited by 12
A Comprehensive Guide to Interpretable AI-Powered Discoveries in Astronomy
Lieu, M. (2025) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe11060187 · Cited by 15
Goode, S., Cooke, J., Zhang, J., Mahabal, A. A., Webb, S., & Hegarty, S. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac983 · Cited by 13
Chun, S., Lee, J., & Lim, D. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba829 · Cited by 11
El-CID: a filter for gravitational-wave electromagnetic counterpart identification
Chatterjee, D., Narayan, G., Aleo, P., Malanchev, K. L., & Muthukrishna, D. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3023 · Cited by 11
Anomaly Detection and Approximate Similarity Searches of Transients in Real-time Data Streams
Aleo, P., Engel, A. W., Narayan, G., Angus, C. R., Malanchev, K. L., Auchettl, K., Baldassare, V., Berres, A., de Boer, T. J. L., Boyd, B. M., et al. (2024) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6869 · Cited by 10
Demianenko, M., Malanchev, K. L., Samorodova, E., Sysak, M., Shiriaev, A., Деркач, Д., & Hushchyn, M. (2023) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245189 · Cited by 10
Morello, G., Morris, P., Dyk, S. D. V., Marston, A. P., & Mauerhan, J. C. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2474 · Cited by 11
On the cosmological performance of photometrically classified supernovae with machine learning
dos Santos, M. V., Quartin, M., & Reis, R. R. R. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1968 · Cited by 10
Carrick, J. E., Hook, I., Swann, E., Boone, K., Frohmaier, C., Kim, A., & Sullivan, M. (2021) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2343 · Cited by 10
A classifier-based approach to multiclass anomaly detection for astronomical transients
Gupta, R., Muthukrishna, D., & Lochner, M. (2024) · RAS Techniques and Instruments · doi:10.1093/rasti/rzae054 · Cited by 17
Self-citationMalz, A. I., Hložek, R., Allam, T., Bahmanyar, A., Biswas, R., Dai, M., Galbany, L., Ishida, E., Jha, S. W., Jones, D. O., et al. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · doi:10.17863/cam.45849 · Cited by 9
Self-citationSNAD transient miner: Finding missed transient events in ZTF DR4 using k-D trees
Aleo, P., Malanchev, K. L., Pruzhinskaya, M. V., Ishida, É. E. O., Russeil, E., Kornilov, M., Korolev, V., Sreejith, S., Volnova, A. A., & Narayan, G. (2022) · New Astronomy · doi:10.1016/j.newast.2022.101846 · Cited by 9
Pennock, C. M., van Loon, J. T., Anih, J. O., Maitra, C., Haberl, F., Sansom, A. E., Ivanov, V. D., Cowley, M. J., Afonso, J., Antón, S., et al. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2096 · Cited by 9
Impact of Rubin Observatory Cadence Choices on Supernovae Photometric Classification
Alves, C. S., Peiris, H. V., Lochner, M., McEwen, J. D., & Kessler, R. (2023) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acbb09 · Cited by 9
Self-citationDeep Generative Modeling of Periodic Variable Stars Using Physical Parameters
Martínez-Palomera, J., Bloom, J. S., & Abrahams, E. S. (2022) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac9b3f · Cited by 9
Active learning with RESSPECT: Resource allocation for extragalactic astronomical transients
Kennamer, N., Ishida, E., González-Gaitán, S., de Souza, R., Ihler, A., Ponder, K., Vilalta, R., Möller, A., Jones, D. O., Dai, M., et al. (2020) · IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/ssci47803.2020.9308300 · Cited by 10
Brown, S. T., Fattahi, A., McCarthy, I. G., Font, A. S., Oman, K. A., & Riley, A. H. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1378 · Cited by 8
ORACLE: A Real-time, Hierarchical, Deep Learning Photometric Classifier for the LSST
Shah, V. G., Gagliano, A. T., Malanchev, K. L., Narayan, G., & Malz, A. I. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1130 · Cited by 8
Autenrieth, M., van Dyk, D. A., Trotta, R., & Stenning, D. C. (2023) · Statistical Analysis and Data Mining The ASA Data Science Journal · doi:10.1002/sam.11643 · Cited by 10
Photometric data-driven classification of Type Ia supernovae in the open Supernova Catalog
Dobryakov, S., Malanchev, K., Деркач, Д., & Hushchyn, M. (2021) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100451 · Cited by 8
Transient Detection Modelling for Gravitational-wave Optical Transient Observer (GOTO) Sky Survey
Tabacolde, A. B., Boongoen, T., Iam-On, N., Mullaney, J. R., Sawangwit, U., & Ulaczyk, K. (2018) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing (ICMLC) · doi:10.1145/3195106.3195153 · Cited by 8
Data Challenges as a Tool for Time-domain Astronomy
Hložek, R. (2019) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ab311d · Cited by 7
Imbalanced Ensemble Learning for Enhanced Pulsar Identification
Holewik, J., Schaefer, G., & Korovin, I. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53956-6_47 · Cited by 7
Statistical Methods in Astronomy
Long, J. P., & de Souza, R. S. (2018) · Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online · doi:10.1002/9781118445112.stat07996 · Cited by 7
Detecting unresolved lensed SNe Ia in LSST using blended light curves
Bag, S., Huber, S., Suyu, S. H., Arendse, N., Andika, I. T., Cañameras, R., Kim, A., Linder, E. V., Lodha, K., Melo, A., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450485 · Cited by 6
Andersson, A., Lintott, C. J., Fender, R. P., Lochner, M., Woudt, P. A., van den Eijnden, J., van der Horst, A. J., Horesh, A., Saikia, P., Sivakoff, G. R., et al. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf336 · Cited by 6
Self-citationA New Method to Classify Type IIP/IIL Supernovae Based on Their Spectra
Kou, S., Chen, X., & Liu, X. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6601 · Cited by 8
Arendt, A. R., Perrott, Y. C., Contreras-Santos, A., de Andrés, D., Cui, W., & Rennehan, D. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae568 · Cited by 9
Deep Learning of the Eddington Tensor in Core-collapse Supernova Simulation
Harada, A., Nishikawa, S., & Yamada, S. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3998 · Cited by 6
Hybrid ensemble machine learning models
Giudici, P., Marıanı, F., & Polinesi, G. (2025) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2025.131083 · Cited by 4
Ruchika, R., Mukherjee, P., & Favale, A. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae650b · Cited by 17
Building spectral templates and reconstructing parameters for core-collapse supernovae with CASTOR
Simongini, A., Ragosta, F., Piranomonte, S., & Palma, I. D. (2024) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1911 · Cited by 4
On the Classification and Feature Relevance of Multiband Light Curves
Edes-Huyal, F. K., Çataltepe, Z., & Kahya, E. O. (2021) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abdecf · Cited by 4
Diagnosing Extrusion Process Based on Displacement Signal and Simple Decision Tree Classifier
Piecuch, G., & Żyła, R. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22010379 · Cited by 4
Fuzzy and SVM Based Classification Model to Classify Spectral Objects in Sloan Digital Sky
Karn, A. L., Romero, C. A. T., Sengan, S., Mehbodniya, A., Webber, J. L., Pustokhin, D. A., & Wende, F.-D. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207480 · Cited by 4
C 2 -GaMe: Classification of cluster galaxy membership with machine learning
Farid, D., Aung, H., Nagai, D., Farahi, A., & Rozo, E. (2023) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2023.100743 · Cited by 4
STag: Supernova Tagging and Classification
Davison, W., Parkinson, D., & Tucker, B. E. (2022) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3422 · Cited by 4
Optimizing supernova classification with interpretable machine learning models
Garg, A. (2025) · Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s12036-025-10113-4 · Cited by 3
Molina-Jorquera, F., Damke, G., Olivares, D. F., Arancibia, M. J., Almeida-Fernandes, F., Daflon, S., Schoenell, W., Ribeiro, T., Kanaan, A., Torres-Flores, S., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451059 · Cited by 4
The Galaxy Activity, Torus, and Outflow Survey (GATOS)
Poitevineau, R., Combes, F., García‐Burillo, S., Cornu, D., Alonso‐Herrero, A., Almeida, C. R., Audibert, A., Bellocchi, E., Boorman, P., Bunker, A. J., et al. (2024) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347566 · Cited by 4
Leveraging pre-trained vision Transformers for multi-band photometric light curve classification
Moreno-Cartagena, D., Protopapas, P., Cabrera-Vives, G., Cádiz-Leyton, M., Becker, I., & Donoso-Oliva, C. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554289 · Cited by 12
Profiling Astronomical Objects Using Unsupervised Learning Approach
Sangpetch, T., Boongoen, T., & Iam-On, N. (2022) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2023.026739 · Cited by 3
Machine-learning enhanced photometric analysis of the extremely bright GRB 210822A
Angulo-Valdez, C., Becerra, R. L., Pereyra, M., Garcia-Cifuentes, K., Vargas, F., Watson, A. M., Colle, F. D., Fraija, N. I., Butler, N., Dainotti, M. G., et al. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3624 · Cited by 3
Applications Research of Machine Learning Algorithm in Translation System
Lu, Y., Chen, D., & Wu, W. (2018) · International Conference on Machinery, Materials and Computing Technology (ICMMCT) · doi:10.2991/icmmct-18.2018.13 · Cited by 3
The rest-frame ultraviolet of superluminous supernovae – I. Potential as cosmological probes
Khetan, N., Cooke, J., & Branchesi, M. (2023) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stad661 · Cited by 3
Using Random Forest Machine Learning Algorithms in Binary Supernovae ClassificationPreprint
Markel, J., & Bayless, A. J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.00088 · Cited by 3
AI-powered Reconstruction of Dark Matter Velocity Fields from Redshift-space Halo Distribution
Xiao, X., Ding, J., Luo, X., Lan, S.-K., Xiao, L., Liu, S., Wang, X., Zhang, L., & Li, X.-D. (2024) · Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae10af · Cited by 3
Map Reconstruction of Radio Observations with Conditional Invertible Neural Networks
Zhang, H., Zuo, S., & Zhang, L. (2023) · Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1088/1674-4527/acd0ee · Cited by 2
Retracted: A Simple Translation System Using a Machine Learning Algorithm
Chinthamu, N., Pundir, S., Sharma, A., Srivastava, A., Kumar, R., & Shrivastava, A. (2023) · International Conference on Circuits, Power and Intelligent Systems (CCPIS) · doi:10.1109/ccpis59145.2023.10291630 · Cited by 2
RetractedAbdelhadi, B., & Rubin, D. (2024) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ad9a7d · Cited by 2
AMPEL workflows for LSST: Modular and reproducible real-time photometric classification
Nordin, J., Brinnel, V., Santen, J. V., Reusch, S., & Kowalski, M. P. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452481 · Cited by 2
Boongoen, T., & Iam-On, N. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-12007-5 · Cited by 2
Garretson, B., Milisavljevic, D., Reynolds, J. M., Weil, K. E., Subrayan, B., Banovetz, J., & Lee, R. C. (2021) · Research Notes of the AAS · doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ac416e · Cited by 2
Perrefort, D., Zhang, Y., Galbany, L., Wood-Vasey, W. M., & González-Gaitán, S. (2020) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abbefc · Cited by 2
Ensemble Classifiers for Pulsar Detection
Holewik, J., & Schaefer, G. (2021) · Emergence, complexity and computation · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-65867-0_7 · Cited by 2
Data-driven photometric redshift estimation from type Ia supernovae light curves
de Oliveira, F. M. F., dos Santos, M. V., & Reis, R. R. R. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3202 · Cited by 2
Characterizing the Sample Selection for Supernova Cosmology
Kim, A. (2021) · The Open Journal of Astrophysics · doi:10.21105/astro.2007.11100 · Cited by 2
Characterizing the Sample Selection for Supernova Cosmology
Kim, A. (2021) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 2
Model-independent quantum phases classifier
Mahlow, F. R. P., Luiz, F. S., Malvezzi, A. L., & Fanchini, F. F. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-33301-0 · Cited by 1
Fine-grained photometric classification using multi-model fusion method with redshift estimation
Peng, C., Liu, Z., Zeraatgari, F. Z., & Mei, L. (2024) · Journal of High Energy Astrophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2024.07.008 · Cited by 1
Multimodal multi-output ordinal regression for discovering gravitationally-lensed transients
Vago, N. O. P., & Fraternali, P. (2025) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ade360 · Cited by 1
Identifying radio active galactic nuclei with machine learning and large-area surveys
Fan, X.-L., & Li, J. (2025) · Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453082 · Cited by 1
Can Fractal Dimension Distinguish between Grand-design and Flocculent Spiral Arms?
Saha, B., Dutta, S., & Banerjee, A. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf840 · Cited by 1
Identification of anomalous E+A galaxies in GAMA using an isolation forest
Broadbelt, K., Pimbblet, K. A., & Farrow, D. J. (2025) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1625 · Cited by 1
Grasso, A. C., Zoppo, V. D., Mezzina, A., Cataldo, M., Puglisi, G., Spampinato, F., Cosentino, S. P., Pumo, M. L., & Naso, L. (2026) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101116 · Cited by 1
Amrich, S., Mackovjak, Š., Strhárský, I., Baláž, J., & Hančikovský, M. (2021) · Journal of Instrumentation · doi:10.1088/1748-0221/16/12/t12016 · Cited by 1
Searching for outliers in the Chandra Source Catalog
Swarm, D. K., DeRoo, C. T., Liu, Y., & Watkins, S. (2022) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2481 · Cited by 1
Wide-field Multi-object Spectroscopy to Enhance Dark Energy Science from LSSTPreprint
Newman, J. A., Blazek, J., Chisari, N. E., Clowe, D., Dell’Antonio, I., Gawiser, E., Hložek, R., Kim, A., von der Linden, A., Lochner, M., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 1
Self-citationResearch of Cosmological Structures Recognition Quality with the Modified FRIS-TAX Algorithm
Volkova, V. M., & Talnikov, V. O. (2018) · International Scientific-Technical Conference on Actual Problems of Electronic Instrument Engineering (APEIE) · doi:10.1109/apeie.2018.8545186
Machine Learning Analysis of Supernova Light Curves
Pruzhinskaya, M. V., Malanchev, K. L., Kornilov, M., Ishida, É. E. O., Mondon, F., Volnova, A. A., & Korolev, V. (2019) · Accretion Processes in Cosmic Sources (APCS) · doi:10.22323/1.342.0051
Artificial Intelligence an Influential Review: Pandemic Scenario
Chauhan, R., Sengupta, A., & Yafi, E. (2022) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) · doi:10.1109/imcom53663.2022.9721753
Yang, T. Z., Zhang, M., Shen, T., Jiang, J., Faison, M. D., Warrener, M., & Zheng, T. (2023) · Astrophysics and Space Science · doi:10.1007/s10509-023-04250-x
SuperNNova light-curve simulations
Möller, A., & de Boissière, T. (2019) · Figshare · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3265188
Deep Space Insights: Machine Learning Revolutionizing Astrophysical Discoveries
Dutta, S., & Paul, P. (2025) · EPJ Web of Conferences · doi:10.1051/epjconf/202532501012
Machine Learning Identification of Gravitationally Microlensed Gamma-Ray Bursts
Haghighi, M. H. Z., Kalantari, Z., Rahvar, S., & Ibrahim, A. (2025) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae03b1 · Cited by 1
DMTN-118: Review of Timeseries Features
Bellm, E. C. (2025) · DOE SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Repository · doi:10.71929/rubin/2997999
Disentangling conditional redshift effects in Quasar–Galaxy photometric classification
Mattera, R. (2026) · Astronomy and Computing · doi:10.1016/j.ascom.2026.101104
Learning salient information with neural networks for cosmological analysis
Lin, Q. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/044e7500zfd93z4c6az8457z4809ad535dae
经典卷积神经网络与视觉Transformer在太阳图像分类中的对比研究(特邀)
Yuchen, 敖. A., & Dong, 陈. C. (2026) · Laser & Optoelectronics Progress · doi:10.3788/lop252180
Guha, D. P., & Tabassum, F. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Photonics, Artificial Intelligence & Networking (QPAIN) · doi:10.1109/qpain69676.2026.11546175
Searching for Type Ia Supernovae in the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument
Zhuang, X., Song, R., Meng, D., Ding, W., Zheng, R., Yao, Y., Lin, Z., Fu, B.-X., Li, F., Xu, Z., et al. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae7083
A Review of Machine Learning in Astronomical Plate Digitization and Survey Data
Zafar, T. A., & Hudec, R. (2026) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ae7205
Garg, A. (2026) · Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s12036-026-10184-x
Supernova Classification Using the Recurrent Neural Network in the CSST Ultra-deep Field Survey
Wang, M., Gong, Y., Zhou, D., & Chen, X. (2026) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae8853
Compact and physically interpretable feature models for photometric type Ia supernova classification
Garg, A. (2026) · Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy · doi:10.1007/s12036-026-10175-y
Metadata
- Authors
- Lochner, M., McEwen, J. D., Peiris, H. V., Lahav, O., & Winter, M. K.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lochner, Michelle
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2016-08-01
- Volume
- 225
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 31
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2292579160
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 9.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (FP7/2007-2013, ST/N000811/1, ST/M00015X/1, ST/L00660X/1, ST/N00258X/1, ST/N002512/1)
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (306478)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Neutrino Physics Research
- Keywords
- supernova classification, photometric classification, wavelet feature extraction, boosted decision trees, supernova photometry, spectroscopic follow-up, multiband light curves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review