Cited by 92Gamma-ray bursts and supernovaeGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation

SuperRAENN: A Semisupervised Supernova Photometric Classification Pipeline Trained on Pan-STARRS1 Medium-Deep Survey Supernovae

Open access
Villar, V. Ashley, Hosseinzadeh, Griffin, Berger, Edo, Ntampaka, Michelle, Jones, David O., Challis, Peter, Chornock, Ryan, Drout, Maria R. +13 more·2020·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Abstract Automated classification of supernovae (SNe) based on optical photometric light-curve information is essential in the upcoming era of wide-field time domain surveys, such as the Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) conducted by the Rubin Observatory. Photometric classification can enable real-time identification of interesting events for extended multiwavelength follow-up, as well as archival population studies. Here we present the complete sample of 5243 “SN-like” light curves (in g P1 r P1 i P1 z P1) from the Pan-STARRS1 Medium-Deep Survey (PS1-MDS). The PS1-MDS is similar to the planned LSST Wide-Fast-Deep survey in terms of cadence, filters, and depth, making this a useful training set for the community. Using this data set, we train a novel semisupervised machine learning algorithm to photometrically classify 2315 new SN-like light curves with host galaxy spectroscopic redshifts. Our algorithm consists of an RF supervised classification step and a novel unsupervised step in which we introduce a recurrent autoencoder neural network (RAENN). Our final pipeline, dubbed SuperRAENN, has an accuracy of 87% across five SN classes (Type Ia, Ibc, II, IIn, SLSN-I) and macro-averaged purity and completeness of 66% and 69%, respectively. We find the highest accuracy rates for SNe Ia and SLSNe and the lowest for SNe Ibc. Our complete spectroscopically and photometrically classified samples break down into 62.0% Type Ia (1839 objects), 19.8% Type II (553 objects), 4.8% Type IIn (136 objects), 11.7% Type Ibc (291 objects), and 1.6% Type I SLSNe (54 objects).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/abc6fd

Cites

110 of 110 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Villar et al. (2021b) used a Variational Recurrent Autoencoder (VRAE) network described in Villar et al. (2020) to identify anomalous light curves from the simulated PLAsTiCC dataset.

    “Villar et al. (2021b) used a Variational Recurrent Autoencoder (VRAE) network described in Villar et al. (2020) to identify anomalous light curves from the simulated PLAsTiCC dataset.”

    From The Dawes Review 10: The impact of deep learning for the analysis of galaxy surveys (2023) · cites this paper as Villar et al. (2020)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villar, V. A., Hosseinzadeh, G., Berger, E., Ntampaka, M., Jones, D. O., Challis, P., Chornock, R., Drout, M. R., Foley, R. J., Kirshner, R. P., Lunnan, R., Margutti, R., Milisavljevic, D., Sanders, N., Pan, Y.-C., Rest, A., Scolnic, D. M., Magnier, E., Metcalfe, N., Wainscoat, R., & Waters, C.
Affiliations
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (US)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • National Central University (TW)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2020-12-01
Volume
905
Issue
2
Pages
94
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W3048419233
Cited by
92
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1914448, 1518052, 1829740, 2037297, 1815935, 1714498, 1238877, NAS 5-26555)
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNG16PJ34C, 14-WPS14-0048, NAS 526555, NNX08AR22G, AST-1238877, 526555, NNG-17PX03C, AR-14296)
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (NNX08AR22G)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • Harvard University
  • Johns Hopkins University (NAS 5-26555)
  • Space Telescope Science Institute (NAS5- 26555, 5-26555, NNX08AR22G, 26555)
  • European Commission (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017., 794467, H2020‐MSCA‐IF, H2020-MSCA)
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • Durham University
  • Queen's University
  • National Central University
  • Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
  • Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie
  • Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (MSCA-IF-2017-794467, H2020-MSCA, H2020-MSCA-IF-2017, MSCA-IF-2017)
  • Science Mission Directorate (NAS 5-26555, NNX08AR22G)
  • Harvard Data Science Initiative, Harvard University
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/T000244/1)
  • FAS Division of Science, Harvard University
  • Planetary Science Division (NNX08AR22G)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (NAS 5-26555)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Astronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Keywords
supernova light curves, semi-supervised learning, Type Ia supernovae, Type Ib/c supernovae, Type II supernovae, Type IIn supernovae, superluminous supernovae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review