Cited by 39Astro and Planetary ScienceStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Satellite Systems and Control

OBSERVATIONAL SIGNATURES OF A MASSIVE DISTANT PLANET ON THE SCATTERING DISK

Open access
Lawler, S. M., Shankman, C., Kaib, N., Bannister, M. T., Gladman, B., Kavelaars, J. J.·2017·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

The orbital element distribution of trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) with large pericenters has been suggested to be influenced by the presence of an undetected, large planet at >200 au from the Sun. To find additional observables caused by this scenario, we present here the first detailed emplacement simulation in the presence of a massive ninth planet on the distant Kuiper Belt. We perform 4 Gyr N-body simulations with the currently known solar system planetary architecture, plus a 10 M ⊕ planet with similar orbital parameters to those suggested by Trujillo & Sheppard or Batygin & Brown, and 10 5 test particles in an initial planetesimal disk. We find that including a distant super-Earth-mass planet produces a substantially different orbital distribution for the scattering and detached TNOs, raising the pericenters and inclinations of moderate semimajor axis (50 < a < 500 au) objects. We test whether this signature is detectable via a simulator with the observational characteristics of four precisely characterized TNO surveys. We find that the qualitatively very distinct solar system models that include a ninth planet are essentially observationally indistinguishable from an outer solar system produced solely by the four giant planets. We also find that the mass of the Kuiper Belt’s current scattering and detached populations is required to be 3–10 times larger in the presence of an additional planet. We do not find any evidence for clustering of orbital angles in our simulated TNO population. Wide-field, deep surveys targeting inclined high-pericenter objects will be required to distinguish between these different scenarios.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/153/1/33

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [7]7. Dones, L., Weissman, P. R., Levison, H. F., & Duncan, M. J. 2004, in Comets II, Oort Cloud formation and dynamics, ed. M. C. Festou, H. U. Keller, & H. A. Weaver (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 153
  2. [19]19. M. A. Barucci et al. (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 43
  3. [24]24. Kavelaars, J., Jones, L., Gladman, B., Parker, J. W., & Petit, J.-M. 2008, in The Solar System Beyond Neptune, The Orbital and Spatial Distribution of the Kuiper Belt, ed. M. A. Barucci et al. (Tucson, AZ: Univ. Arizona Press), 59
  4. [27]27. J. A. Hynek (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill), 357
  5. [35]35. Petit, J., Kavelaars, J. J., Gladman, B. J., et al. 2016, arXiv:1608.02873 · arXiv
  6. [39]39. Shankman, C., Kavelaars, J. J., Lawler, S. M., Gladman, B. J., & Bannister, M. T. 2016, arXiv:1610.04251 · arXiv
  7. [40]40. Sheppard, S. S., & Trujillo, C. 2016, arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawler, S. M., Shankman, C., Kaib, N., Bannister, M. T., Gladman, B., & Kavelaars, J. J.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council Canada (CA)
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2016-12-29
Volume
153
Issue
1
Pages
33
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2554139948
Cited by
39
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UVic’s Research and Learning Repository (University of Victoria) (submittedVersion)
  • NPARC (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Canadian Space Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
ninth planet, trans-Neptunian objects, Kuiper belt, orbital element distribution, pericenter, orbital inclination, N-body simulations, planetesimal disk, orbital clustering, observational signatures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review