Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,014

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Revised TESS Input Catalog and Candidate Target List

Open access
Stassun, Keivan G., Oelkers, Ryan J., Paegert, Martin, Torres, Guillermo, Pepper, Joshua, Lee, Nathan De, Collins, Kevin, Latham, David W., Muirhead, Philip S., Chittidi, Jay, Rojas-Ayala, Bárbara, Fleming, Scott W., Rose, Mark E., Tenenbaum, Peter, Ting, Eric B., Kane, Stephen R., Barclay, Thomas, Bean, Jacob L., Brassuer, C. E., Charbonneau, David, Ge, Jian, Lissauer, Jack J., Mann, Andrew W., McLean, Brian, Mullally, Susan, Narita, Norio, Plavchan, Peter, Ricker, George R., Sasselov, Dimitar, Seager, S., Sharma, Sanjib, Shiao, Bernie, Sozzetti, Alessandro, Stello, Dennis, Vanderspek, Roland, Wallace, Geoff, Winn, Joshua N.·2019·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

We describe the catalogs assembled and the algorithms used to populate the revised TESS Input Catalog (TIC), based on the incorporation of the Gaia second data release. We also describe a revised ranking system for prioritizing stars for 2 minute cadence observations, and we assemble a revised Candidate Target List (CTL) using that ranking. The TIC is available on the Mikulski Archive for Space Telescopes server, and an enhanced CTL is available through the Filtergraph data visualization portal system at http://filtergraph.vanderbilt.edu/tess_ctl.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

See all 1,014

Metadata

Authors
Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Paegert, M., Torres, G., Pepper, J., Lee, N. D., Collins, K., Latham, D. W., Muirhead, P. S., Chittidi, J., Rojas-Ayala, B., Fleming, S. W., Rose, M. E., Tenenbaum, P., Ting, E. B., Kane, S. R., Barclay, T., Bean, J. L., Brassuer, C. E., Charbonneau, D., Ge, J., Lissauer, J. J., Mann, A. W., McLean, B., Mullally, S., Narita, N., Plavchan, P., Ricker, G. R., Sasselov, D., Seager, S., Sharma, S., Shiao, B., Sozzetti, A., Stello, D., Vanderspek, R., Wallace, G., & Winn, J. N.
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2019-09-09
Volume
158
Issue
4
Pages
138
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W2972978217
Cited by
1,014
References
37
FWCI
53.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Revised TESS Input Catalog and Candidate Target List. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467
The paper
Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Paegert, M., Torres, G., Pepper, J., Lee, N. D., Collins, K., Latham, D. W., Muirhead, P. S., Chittidi, J., Rojas-Ayala, B., Fleming, S. W., Rose, M. E., Tenenbaum, P., Ting, E. B., Kane, S. R., Barclay, T., Bean, J. L., Brassuer, C. E., . . . Winn, J. N. (2019). The Revised TESS Input Catalog and Candidate Target List. The Astronomical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ab3467

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.