Cited by 47Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae

Searching for Changing-state AGNs in Massive Data Sets. I. Applying Deep Learning and Anomaly-detection Techniques to Find AGNs with Anomalous Variability Behaviors

Open access
Sánchez-Sáez, P., Lira, H., Martí, L., Sánchez-Pi, N., Arredondo, J., Bauer, F. E., Bayo, A., Cabrera-Vives, G. +9 more·2021·The Astronomical Journal

Abstract

The classic classification scheme for active galactic nuclei (AGNs) was recently challenged by the discovery of the so-called changing-state (changing-look) AGNs. The physical mechanism behind this phenomenon is still a matter of open debate and the samples are too small and of serendipitous nature to provide robust answers. In order to tackle this problem, we need to design methods that are able to detect AGNs right in the act of changing state. Here we present an anomaly-detection technique designed to identify AGN light curves with anomalous behaviors in massive data sets. The main aim of this technique is to identify CSAGN at different stages of the transition, but it can also be used for more general purposes, such as cleaning massive data sets for AGN variability analyses. We used light curves from the Zwicky Transient Facility data release 5 (ZTF DR5), containing a sample of 230,451 AGNs of different classes. The ZTF DR5 light curves were modeled with a Variational Recurrent Autoencoder (VRAE) architecture, that allowed us to obtain a set of attributes from the VRAE latent space that describes the general behavior of our sample. These attributes were then used as features for an Isolation Forest (IF) algorithm that is an anomaly detector for a “one class” kind of problem. We used the VRAE reconstruction errors and the IF anomaly score to select a sample of 8809 anomalies. These anomalies are dominated by bogus candidates, but we were able to identify 75 promising CSAGN candidates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-3881/ac1426

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sánchez-Sáez, P., Lira, H., Martí, L., Sánchez-Pi, N., Arredondo, J., Bauer, F. E., Bayo, A., Cabrera-Vives, G., Donoso-Oliva, C., Estévez, P. A., Eyheramendy, S., Förster, F., Hernández-García, L., Arancibia, A. M. M., Pérez-Carrasco, M., Sepúlveda, M., & Vergara, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Inria Chile (CL)
  • Millennium Institute of Astrophysics (CL)
  • Space Science Institute (US)
  • Millenium Nucleus for Planet Formation (CL)
  • University of Concepción (CL)
  • Adolfo Ibáñez University (CL)
  • University of Chile (CL)
Venue
The Astronomical Journal
Published
2021-10-20
Volume
162
Issue
5
Pages
206
ISSN
  • 0004-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-3881
OpenAlex
W4212881834
Cited by
47
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astronomical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1440341, AFB-170002, ICN12_009)
  • California Institute of Technology
  • University of Washington
  • Corporación de Fomento de la Producción (10CEII-9157)
  • Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
  • Stockholms Universitet
  • Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo (FONDEQUIP-EQM180180, 1200495, 1200710, 10CEII-9157, 1171678, AFB170002, ICN12$\_$009, NCN19_171, EQM180180, 1190818, 11191130, 3200250)
  • Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron
  • Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (ICN12_009, EQM180180, FONDEQUIP-EQM180180, 170002, 11191130, 10CEII-9157, AFB-170002, NCN19_171)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Keywords
changing-look AGN, AGN variability, anomaly detection, AGN light curves, Isolation Forest, Zwicky Transient Facility, AGN classification, latent space features, reconstruction error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review