The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Implications of z ∼ 6 Quasar Proximity Zones for the Epoch of Reionization and Quasar Lifetimes
Open accessAbstract
We study quasar proximity zones in the redshift range 5.77 ≤ z ≤ 6.54 by homogeneously analyzing 34 medium-resolution spectra, encompassing both archival and newly obtained data, and exploiting recently updated systemic redshift and magnitude measurements. Whereas previous studies found strong evolution of proximity zone sizes with redshift and argued that this provides evidence for a rapidly evolving intergalactic medium (IGM) neutral fraction during reionization, we measure a much shallower trend ∝ ( 1 + z ) − 1.44 . We compare our measured proximity zone sizes to predictions from hydrodynamical simulations post-processed with one-dimensional radiative transfer and find good agreement between observations and theory, irrespective of the ionization state of the ambient IGM. This insensitivity to IGM ionization state has been previously noted, and results from the fact that the definition of proximity zone size as the first drop of the smoothed quasar spectrum below the 10% flux transmission level probes locations where the ionizing radiation from the quasar is an order of magnitude larger than the expected ultraviolet ionizing background that sets the neutral fraction of the IGM. Our analysis also uncovered three objects with exceptionally small proximity zones (two have R p < 1 proper Mpc), which constitute outliers from the observed distribution and are challenging to explain with our radiative transfer simulations. We consider various explanations for their origin, such as strong absorption line systems associated with the quasar or patchy reionization, but find that the most compelling scenario is that these quasars have been shining for ≲10 5 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes
Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. (2020) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455 · Cited by 665
Early galaxy formation and its large-scale effects
Dayal, P., & Ferrara, A. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.10.002 · Cited by 403
An ALMA [C ii] Survey of 27 Quasars at z > 5.94
Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., Bañados, E., Bertoldi, F., Carilli, C., Fan, X., Farina, E. P., Mazzucchelli, C., Riechers, D., et al. (2018) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa · Cited by 308
Self-citationPhysical Properties of 15 Quasars at z ≳ 6.5
Mazzucchelli, C., Bañados, E., Venemans, B. P., Decarli, R., Farina, E. P., Walter, F., Eilers, A.-C., Rix, H.-W., Simcoe, R., Stern, D., et al. (2017) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9185 · Cited by 305
Self-citationQuasars and the Intergalactic Medium at Cosmic Dawn
Fan, X., Bañados, E., & Simcoe, R. A. (2023) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-102455 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Eilers, A.-C., Davies, F. B., Hennawi, J. F., Prochaska, J. X., Lukić, Z., & Mazzucchelli, C.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2017-05-01
- Volume
- 840
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2610513321
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implications of z ∼ 6 Quasar Proximity Zones for the Epoch of Reionization and Quasar Lifetimes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c60
- The paper
- Eilers, A.-C., Davies, F. B., Hennawi, J. F., Prochaska, J. X., Lukić, Z., & Mazzucchelli, C. (2017). Implications of z ∼ 6 Quasar Proximity Zones for the Epoch of Reionization and Quasar Lifetimes. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6c60
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.