Cited by 107Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaStellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

PHAT. XIX. The Ancient Star Formation History of the M31 Disk

Open access
Williams, Benjamin F., Dolphin, Andrew E., Dalcanton, Julianne J., Weisz, Daniel R., Bell, Eric F., Lewis, Alexia R., Rosenfield, Philip, Choi, Yumi +2 more·2017·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We map the star formation history across M31 by fitting stellar evolution models to color–magnitude diagrams of each 83″ × 83″ (0.3 × 1.4 kpc, deprojected) region of the Panchromatic Hubble Andromeda Treasury (PHAT) survey outside of the innermost portion. We find that most of the star formation occurred prior to ∼8 Gyr ago, followed by a relatively quiescent period until ∼4 Gyr ago, a subsequent star formation episode about 2 Gyr ago, and a return to relative quiescence. There appears to be little, if any, structure visible for populations with ages older than 2 Gyr, suggesting significant mixing since that epoch. Finally, assuming a Kroupa initial mass function from 0.1 to 100 M ⊙ , we find that the total amount of star formation over the past 14 Gyr in the area over which we have fit models is 5 × 10 10 M ⊙ . Fitting the radial distribution of this star formation and assuming azimuthal symmetry, (1.5 ± 0.2) × 10 11 M ⊙ of stars has formed in the M31 disk as a whole, (9 ± 2) × 10 10 M ⊙ of which has likely survived to the present after accounting for evolutionary effects. This mass is about one-fifth of the total dynamical mass of M31.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/aa862a

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, B. F., Dolphin, A. E., Dalcanton, J. J., Weisz, D. R., Bell, E. F., Lewis, A. R., Rosenfield, P., Choi, Y., Skillman, E., & Monachesi, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • RTX (United States) (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of La Serena (CL)
Corresponding author
  • Dolphin, Andrew E.
  • Weisz, Daniel R.
  • Bell, Eric F.
  • Lewis, Alexia R.
  • Rosenfield, Philip
  • Skillman, Evan
  • Monachesi, Antonela
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2017-09-10
Volume
846
Issue
2
Pages
145
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2755451496
Cited by
107
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
5.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
M31, star formation history, disk galaxies, stellar populations, stellar evolution models, color-magnitude diagram, initial mass function, Kroupa IMF, chemical mixing, stellar mass, dynamical mass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review