Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 526

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gaps and Rings in an ALMA Survey of Disks in the Taurus Star-forming Region

Open access
Long 龙, Feng 凤, Pinilla, Paola, Herczeg 沈, Gregory J. 雷歌, Harsono, Daniel, Dipierro, Giovanni, Pascucci, Ilaria, Hendler, Nathan, Tazzari, Marco, Ragusa, Enrico, Salyk, Colette, Edwards, Suzan, Lodato, Giuseppe, van de Plas, Gerrit, Johnstone, Doug, Liu, Yao, Boehler, Yann, Cabrit, Sylvie, Manara, Carlo F., Menard, Francois, Mulders, Gijs D., Nisini, Brunella, Fischer, William J., Rigliaco, Elisabetta, Banzatti, Andrea, Avenhaus, Henning, Gully-Santiago, Michael·2018·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Rings are the most frequently revealed substructure in Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) dust observations of protoplanetary disks, but their origin is still hotly debated. In this paper, we identify dust substructures in 12 disks and measure their properties to investigate how they form. This subsample of disks is selected from a high-resolution (∼0.″12) ALMA 1.33 mm survey of 32 disks in the Taurus star-forming region, which was designed to cover a wide range of brightness and to be unbiased to previously known substructures. While axisymmetric rings and gaps are common within our sample, spiral patterns and high-contrast azimuthal asymmetries are not detected. Fits of disk models to the visibilities lead to estimates of the location and shape of gaps and rings, the flux in each disk component, and the size of the disk. The dust substructures occur across a wide range of stellar mass and disk brightness. Disks with multiple rings tend to be more massive and more extended. The correlation between gap locations and widths, the intensity contrast between rings and gaps, and the separations of rings and gaps could all be explained if most gaps are opened by low-mass planets (super-Earths and Neptunes) in the condition of low disk turbulence (α = 10−4). The gap locations are not well correlated with the expected locations of CO and N 2 ice lines, so condensation fronts are unlikely to be a universal mechanism to create gaps and rings, though they may play a role in some cases.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 101 references

Cited by

See all 526

Metadata

Authors
Long 龙, F. 凤., Pinilla, P., Herczeg 沈, G. J. 雷., Harsono, D., Dipierro, G., Pascucci, I., Hendler, N., Tazzari, M., Ragusa, E., Salyk, C., Edwards, S., Lodato, G., van de Plas, G., Johnstone, D., Liu, Y., Boehler, Y., Cabrit, S., Manara, C. F., Menard, F., Mulders, G. D., Nisini, B., Fischer, W. J., Rigliaco, E., Banzatti, A., Avenhaus, H., & Gully-Santiago, M.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2018-12-06
Volume
869
Issue
1
Pages
17
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2896707053
Cited by
526
References
101
FWCI
33.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaps and Rings in an ALMA Survey of Disks in the Taurus Star-forming Region. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1
The paper
Long 龙, F. 凤., Pinilla, P., Herczeg 沈, G. J. 雷., Harsono, D., Dipierro, G., Pascucci, I., Hendler, N., Tazzari, M., Ragusa, E., Salyk, C., Edwards, S., Lodato, G., van de Plas, G., Johnstone, D., Liu, Y., Boehler, Y., Cabrit, S., Manara, C. F., Menard, F., . . . Gully-Santiago, M. (2018). Gaps and Rings in an ALMA Survey of Disks in the Taurus Star-forming Region. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.