Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 333

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Tumor associated macrophages in human prostate cancer: relation to clinicopathological variables and survival.

Lissbrant, I F, Stattin, P, Wikstrom, P, Damber, J E, Egevad, L, Bergh, A·2000·International Journal of Oncology

Abstract

Tumor associated macrophages (TAM) influence diverse processes such as angiogenesis, tumor cell proliferation, and metastasis during tumor progression. In a variety of tumor types, the amount of TAM has been associated with prognosis, but their role in prostate cancer has not been elucidated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the role of TAM in a series of 85 cases of prostatic carcinoma, diagnosed at transurethral resection of the prostate between 1975-1983, using immunohistochemistry and morphometrical techniques. Macrophage density was assessed as the maximum number of TAM per field in the three most macrophage dense areas (TAMmax) and as the average volume density of TAM in an estimate of the whole resected tumor. Furthermore, the individual cell profile area of TAM was assessed with an image analyzer. Macrophage variables were thereafter related to histological grade, tumor stage, metastasis as well as to vascular density, tumor cell proliferation and survival. Patients with a volume density of TAM in the fourth quartile had a shorter median cancer specific survival time than patients in the first to third quartile (3.3 vs. 5.9 years, p=0.005). Furthermore, an increased macrophage cell profile area was related to poor clinical outcome (4.6 vs. 5.9 years, p=0.039) whereas TAMmax gave no prognostic information. In a multivariate analysis, metastasis and the volume density of macrophages gave independent prognostic information (p=0.0008, p=0.010). However, when excluding metastasis from the analysis, only Gleason score was an independent predictor of cancer specific survival (p= 0.005). The volume density of TAM, the macrophage cell profile area and TAMmax increased with increasing Gleason score (p=0.001, p=0.0001, p=0.0001 respectively). A correlation was found between the volume density of TAM and tumor cell proliferation (rs=0.44, p=0.001) and an increased macrophage cell profile area was associated to microvessel density (rs=0.42, p=0.0001). Together these results suggest that both the functional state (as reflected by cell size), number and location of the macrophages are of importance for their influence on prostate tumors, but macrophage quantification is not a strong independent prognostic factor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3892/ijo.17.3.445

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Lissbrant, I. F., Stattin, P., Wikstrom, P., Damber, J. E., Egevad, L., & Bergh, A.
Venue
International Journal of Oncology
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
445-51
ISSN
  • 1019-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1791-2423
OpenAlex
W2158770127
Cited by
333
References
0
FWCI
1.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.