Bioenergy from “surplus” land: environmental and socio-economic implications
Open accessAbstract
The increasing demand for biomass for the production of bioenergy is generating land-use conflicts. These conflicts might be solved through spatial segregation of food/feed and energy producing areas by continuing producing food on established and productive agricultural land while growing dedicated energy crops on so called “surplus” land. Ambiguity in the definition and characterization of surplus land as well as uncertainty in assessments of land availability and of future bioenergy potentials is causing confusion about the prospects and the environmental and socio-economic implications of bioenergy development in those areas. The high level of uncertainty is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet taken into account and to the potentials offered by those novel crops and their production methods not being fully exploited. This paper provides a scientific background in support of a reassessment of land available for bioenergy production by clarifying the terminology, identifying constraints and options for an efficient bioenergy-use of surplus land and providing policy recommendations for resolving conflicting land-use demands. A serious approach to factoring in the constraints, combined with creativity in utilizing the options provided, in our opinion, would lead to a more sustainable and efficient development of the bioenergy sector. Unless the sustainability challenge is mastered, the interdependent policy objectives of mitigating climate change, obtaining independence from fossil fuels, feeding and fuelling a growing human world population and maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services will not be met. Despite the advanced developments of bioenergy, we still see regional solutions for designing and establishing sustainable bioenergy production systems with optimized production resulting in social, economic and ecological benefits. Where bioenergy production has been identified as the most suitable option to overcome the given problems of energy security and climate change mitigation, we need to determine which bioenergy cultivation systems are most suitable for the respective types of surplus land, by taking into account issues such as yields, inputs and costs, as well as potential environmental and socio-economic impacts.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review argues that “surplus” land for bioenergy is ambiguously defined and that assessments often overestimate its availability by omitting environmental, economic, and social constraints. It maps those constraints and identifies planning, rural-development, nature-conservation, reclamation, crop-choice, and breeding options for more sustainable bioenergy, with policy recommendations.
Key findings
- Global bioenergy land potentials range from 250 Mha to 1,580 Mha, with associated bioenergy potentials from 0 EJ to about 250 EJ, driven by yield assumptions of 1–33 t dry matter ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and differing restrictions. A moderate estimate for 2020 gives 15 EJ from agricultural land, 36–57 EJ from forestry, and 30 EJ from residues, compared with a global total primary energy supply of about 509 EJ yr⁻¹ in 2009.
- Yields on marginal or degraded land are typically lower: for most crops, yields on very suitable soils were up to three times greater than on marginal soils; Jatropha may yield 0.1–12.5 t ha⁻¹ depending on water availability.
- Constraints include biodiversity and high nature value farmland conflicts, indirect land-use change (iLUC), water footprint (perennial biomass crops can decrease effective rainfall by 50–60% versus annual crops; irrigation already accounts for over 70% of freshwater extraction globally), GHG/soil carbon trade-offs, and socio-economic risks such as displacement and low economic viability.
- Options include active landscape-scale planning, improving rural development, sustaining high nature value farming, halting degradation and reclaiming land, choosing site-appropriate perennial crops, and plant breeding for low-input/marginal conditions; the paper recommends slowing bioenergy expansion, improving baseline data, applying knowledge to appraisals, and implementing planning and steering tools.
Methods
- Design: critical review and conceptual synthesis aimed at clarifying “surplus land” terminology, identifying constraints and options for bioenergy production, and providing policy recommendations.
- Data/sample: no primary empirical sample; the paper draws on cited literature and quantitative estimates from other studies, and arose from the ESF Exploratory Workshop EW09-076 held in Dublin, Ireland, on 26–28 April 2010.
- Analysis: narrative synthesis of land classes (fallow, set-aside, abandoned, marginal, degraded, reclaimed, waste land), constraints, and utilisation options; no systematic meta-analysis or new field data are reported.
Limitations
- The paper states that high uncertainty remains because environmental, economic, and social constraints are not yet systematically taken into account and because potentials of novel crops and production methods are not fully exploited; it also notes that no scientific studies at present resolve the scientific challenges related to assessing future bioenergy potentials.
- It states that no sound and internationally accredited methodology for including iLUC in bioenergy governance exists, and that recent iLUC model outputs were insufficient for informing detailed management decisions; there is also little empirical data to support the species-energy hypothesis and no agreement on the economic viability of bioenergy production on marginal land.
- Evident from the text: this is a conceptual review rather than a systematic review or primary study, and its land-class scheme is acknowledged as having classes that are not on an equal hierarchical level and may intersect or resemble sub-classes of higher categories.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 132 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingcitation
The quality of output of models recently developed to assess iLUC was found to be insufficient for informing detailed management decisions.
“and the quality of the output of models recently developed to assess iLUC was found to be insufficient for informing detailed management decisions (Davis et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
No sound and internationally accredited methodology for inclusion of iLUC issues in bioenergy governance exists so far.
“So far no sound and internationally accredited methodology for inclusion of iLUC issues in bioenergy governance exist (Gawel and Ludwig 2011)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gawel and Ludwig 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Field data suggest that due to lower fertilizer requirements and higher N-use efficiency, perennial bioenergy crops emit 40% to >99% less N2O than conventional annual crops.
“Field data suggest that due to lower fertilizer requirements and higher N-use efficiency, these crops emit 40% to >99% less N 2 O than conventional annual crops (Don et al. 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Don et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
The 'payback period' associated with conversion of various native ecosystems to annual biofuel systems can last up to several centuries.
“Fargione et al. (2008) show that the 'payback period' (i.e. the time before the C debt is fully compensated by avoided fossil fuel C use following biofuel production) associated with the conversion of various native ecosystems to annual biofuel systems can last up to several centuries.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fargione et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingcitation
Costs of rehabilitation of degraded land by afforestation range from 100 € ha-1 (China) to about 3,500 € ha-1 (Austria) with additional costs of 4 to 40 € ha-1 yr-1.
“For example, the costs of rehabilitation of degraded land by afforestation depends on the specific country and is in a range of 100 € ha -1 (China) to about 3,500 € ha -1 (Austria) with additional costs of 4 to 40 € ha -1 yr -1 (Metzger and Hüttermann 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Metzger and Hüttermann 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingreasoning
Currently there is no agreement on economic viability of bioenergy production on marginal land.
“Currently there is no agreement on the economic viability of bioenergy production on marginal land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Even considering same production costs per hectare on degraded compared to non degraded land, cost per ton of crop harvested could be up to 100% higher if yield level is decreased by 50%.
“Even considering the same production costs per hectare on degraded compared to non degraded land, the cost per ton of crop harvested could be up to 100 % higher if the yield level is decreased by 50 % (Hoogwijk et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoogwijk et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Associated estimated bioenergy potentials range from 0 EJ to about 250 EJ, mainly due to a great variety of yield assumptions from 1 to 33 t dry matter ha-1 yr-1 and restrictions considered.
“The associated estimated bioenergy potentials range from 0 EJ to about 250 EJ mainly due to a great variety of yield assumptions (from 1 -33 t dry matter ha -1 yr -1 ) and restrictions considered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Increasing demand for biomass for bioenergy production is generating land-use conflicts.
“The increasing demand for biomass for the production of bioenergy is generating land-use conflicts.”
- Also stated in: § introduction · plain
“The increasing demand for biomass for production of heat, power, biofuels and biobased materials is generating land-use conflicts which are discussed in the food versus fuel controversy (Baffes and Haniotis 2010) and the debate about indirect landuse change (iLUC) effects (Wiegmann et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Baffes and Haniotis 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wiegmann et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Also stated in: § introduction · plain
- Premisereasoning
Global bioenergy land potentials range from 250 Mha to 1,580 Mha.
“Due to the difficulty of definition and different approaches (e.g.theoretical or technical potential) and depending on the objective and/or availability of data and crops considered (annual crops, lignocellulosic crops), the global bioenergy land potentials range from 250 Mha to 1,580 Mha.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Chum et al. (2011) estimate a range from 0 to 100 EJ for biomass production on deforested or otherwise degraded or marginal land judged unsuitable for conventional agriculture but suitable for some bioenergy schemes.
“Chum et al. (2011) estimate a range from 0 -100 EJ for biomass production on deforested or otherwise degraded or marginal land that is judged unsuitable for conventional agriculture but suitable for some bioenergy schemes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chum et al. (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Most assessments overestimate the land area available for bioenergy crops because constraining factors such as water, productivity, social aspects and nature conservation are not taken into account.
“Most assessments overestimate the land area available for bioenergy crops because constraining factors such as water, productivity, social aspects and nature conservation are not taken into account (van Vuuren et al. 2009;Haberl et al. 2010;Beringer et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites van Vuuren et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Haberl et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beringer et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
When biomass containing increased contents of harmful substances such as cadmium is burned, these substances remain in different ash fractions, from which they could be removed by relatively simple technical operations.
“However, when biomass containing increased contents of harmful substances such as cadmium is burned, these substances will remain in the different ash fractions, from which it could be removed by means of relatively simple technical operations (Dimitriou and Aronsson 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dimitriou and Aronsson 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Direct land-use change and intensification to bioenergy cultivation could have negative effects on biodiversity.
“Because direct land-use change and intensification to bioenergy cultivation could have negative effects on biodiversity (Plieninger and Gaertner 2011), current legislation proposed by Germany and the EU on sustainability requirements for biofuel feedstock prohibit the cultivation of bioenergy crops in protected as well as in HNV areas, unless the biomass cultivation is in conformity with the”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Plieninger and Gaertner 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Production of energy crops on contaminated soils of reclaimed areas may cause accumulation of contaminants such as metals, compromising biomass quality.
“Production of energy crops on contaminated soils of reclaimed areas may cause accumulation of contaminants, such as metals (Fernando and Oliveira 2005), hence compromising biomass quality; accumulation by plants has even been discussed as a means of soil remediation (Britt and Garstang 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fernando and Oliveira 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Britt and Garstang 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Low-intensity farming systems are of great importance for agricultural biodiversity preservation.
“Such low-intensity farming systems are of great importance for agricultural biodiversity preservation (Baldock et al. 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baldock et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning
Yields from marginal lands are typically lower than yields from higher grade soils.
“For several reasons, yields from marginal lands are typically lower than yields from higher grade soils.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
For most crops, yields on very suitable soils were up to three times greater than yields on marginal soils.
“For most crops, yields on very suitable soils were up to three times greater than yields on marginal soils.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fisher et al. (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Low yields resulting from low agronomic potentials of land can have both environmental and socio-economic impacts.
“Low yields resulting from low agronomic potentials of land can have both environmental and socio-economic impacts (see also Socio-economic factors).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Under poor soil conditions, even with the adoption of new clones, no increments on the productivity potentialities of the site could be obtained for hybrid poplar SRC.
“Paris et al. (2011) showed that under poor soil conditions, even with the adoption of new clones, no increments on the productivity potentialities of the site could be obtained and thus do not recommend adoption of hybrid poplar SRC on marginal soils.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Paris et al. (2011)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Jatropha production requires large areas of land in semi-arid environments due to relatively poor production of oil on marginal lands.
“An example for increased land-take is the case for the production of Jatropha, which requires large areas of land in semi-arid environments due to relatively poor production of oil on those marginal lands (Giller et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giller et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Jatropha may reach a yield from 0.1 t ha-1 to 12.5 t ha-1, depending on water availability.
“Jatropha, for example, may reach a yield from 0.1 t ha -1 -12.5 t ha -1 , depending on water availability (GTZ 2008;FACT 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites GTZ 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites FACT 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
High biodiversity levels of semi-natural grasslands can only be maintained through continuous management.
“High biodiversity levels of semi-natural grasslands can only be maintained through continuous management and thus using the biomass yield from semi-natural grasslands could promote the sustainable management of such sites in areas threatened by farm abandonment (Heinsoo et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heinsoo et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Species conservation value and soil carbon storage potentials of permanent grassland are potentially in conflict with the strategy of targeting marginal or degraded land for energy crop cultivation.
“Species conservation value and soil carbon storage potentials of permanent grassland are potentially in conflict with the strategy of targeting marginal or degraded land for energy crop cultivation (RFA 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites RFA 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Using the biomass yield from semi-natural grasslands could promote sustainable management of such sites in areas threatened by farm abandonment.
“High biodiversity levels of semi-natural grasslands can only be maintained through continuous management and thus using the biomass yield from semi-natural grasslands could promote the sustainable management of such sites in areas threatened by farm abandonment (Heinsoo et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heinsoo et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Using natural or semi-natural grassland biomass directly for energy conversion may provide a potential way out of the conflict between grassland conservation and bioenergy.
“A potential way out of this conflict may be provided by using the natural or semi-natural grassland biomass directly for energy conversion (Rösch et al. 2009;Bühle et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rösch et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bühle et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In Europe, land most susceptible to agricultural marginalisation is likely to be found in extensive farming regions and those where traditional small-scale farming is prevalent.
“In Europe for example, land most susceptible to agricultural marginalisation is likely to be found in extensive farming regions and those where traditional small-scale farming is prevalent (Baldock et al. 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Baldock et al. 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Establishment of willow SRC on poor soils would result in greatly reduced productivity or even a complete failure of the plantation.
“In a Finnish study, it was shown that establishment of willow SRC on poor soils would result in greatly reduced productivity or even a complete failure of the plantation (Tahvanainen and Rytkönen 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tahvanainen and Rytkönen 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Many marginal lands in Europe are dominated by permanent grassland systems.
“Many marginal lands in Europe are dominated by permanent grassland systems (Veen et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Veen et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Growing crops on marginal or degraded land might affect the quality of total yield for energy or other industrial purposes.
“Growing crops on marginal or degraded land might not only affect the quantity of total yield, but also its quality regarding its use for energy or other industrial purposes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Emission of reactive N as oxides of N into atmosphere caused by combustion of N-rich grassland biomass is a disadvantage in deriving bioenergy from grasslands because of its contribution to acidification.
“Emission of reactive N, as oxides of N into the atmosphere caused by the combustion of N-rich grassland biomass, was identified as a disadvantage in deriving bioenergy from grasslands (Ceotto 2008), because of its contribution to acidification (Biewinga and van der Bijl 1996).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Ceotto 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Biewinga and van der Bijl 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Pushing physical boundaries of agriculture through improved crop breeding and bio- and agritechnology could have serious impacts on (semi-)natural ecosystems previously beyond reach of cultivation.
“Pushing the physical boundaries of agriculture through improved crop breeding and bio-and agritechnology is a further bioenergy development which could have serious impacts on (semi-) natural ecosystems which so far were beyond the reach of cultivation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Landscape polarisation optimising one function such as agricultural production only could lead to functional simplification of landscapes, resulting in limited capacity to support multiple ecosystem services and increased vulnerability to diseases, climatic extremes or spread of invasive species.
“Landscape polarisation in terms of optimising one function such as agricultural production only could lead to functional simplification of landscapes, resulting in a limited capacity to support multiple ecosystem services and increased vulnerability to diseases, climatic extremes or spread of invasive species (Foley et al. 2005;Selman 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Foley et al. 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Selman 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The environmental sustainability of dedicated energy crop plantations outside areas of abandoned or degraded croplands is questionable.
“Those examples make the environmental sustainability of dedicated energy crop plantations outside areas of abandoned or degraded croplands questionable (Beringer et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beringer et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
If only one type of conversion technique prevails in a region, pressure will arise to employ common and intensive management across the region to produce uniform biomass.
“If only one type of conversion technique prevails in a region, pressure will arise to employ common and intensive management across the region to produce uniform biomass.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
If decisions for use of land for Jatropha production in these areas were made by people other than smallholder farmers themselves, this could lead to displacement of people.
“If decisions for the use of land for Jatropha production in these areas were to be made by people other than the smallholder farmers themselves, this could lead to displacement of people.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jingura et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In South America, semiarid scrub forests of Caatinga, Cerrado savanna, and savannas and thorn forests of Chaco are potentially affected by development of novel energy crops such as agave for ethanol.
“In South America for example, the semiarid scrub forests of the Caatinga, the Cerrado savanna and the savannas and thorn forests of the Chaco are potentially affected by the development of novel energy crops such as agave for ethanol (Beringer et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beringer et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Indirect land-use change (iLUC) and its environmental and socio-economic consequences are a constraining factor not adequately taken into account in assessments of bioenergy potentials.
“A further constraining factor which is so far not adequately taken into account in assessments of bioenergy potentials is indirect land-use change (iLUC) and its environmental and socio-economic consequences (Edwards et al. 2010;Reinhard and Zah 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Edwards et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reinhard and Zah 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Areas believed to be surplus can in fact be lands under communal tenure or traditional customary use and are vital for livelihoods of small-scale farmers, pastoralists, women, indigenous peoples and rural poor for food crops, livestock grazing or fuelwood collection.
“Areas believed to be surplus can in fact be lands that have been under communal tenure or traditional customary use and are vital for the livelihoods of small-scale farmers, pastoralists, women, indigenous peoples and the rural poor for food crops, livestock grazing or fuelwood collection (The Gaia Foundation et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites The Gaia Foundation et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Long term studies in Minnesota, USA, have shown a positive relationship between diversity of prairie grassland and productivity.
“Long term studies in Minnesota, USA, have shown a positive relationship between diversity of prairie grassland and productivity (Fornara and Tilman 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fornara and Tilman 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The former land use is of critical importance in determining whether production of energy crops turns soils into a net sink or net source of carbon.
“The former land use is of critical importance in determining whether the production of energy crops turns soils into a net sink or a net source of carbon.(St. Clair et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites St. Clair et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Converting these habitats to bioenergy plantations might put their high environmental value at risk.
“Converting them to bioenergy plantations might put their high environmental value at risk (Beringer et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beringer et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A major constraining factor for cultivation of energy crops in marginal areas is water availability and water footprint.
“Consequently, a major constraining factor for cultivation of energy crops in such areas is water availability and the water footprint (Faaij and Domac 2006;Smeets et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Faaij and Domac 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
If conversion of land to energy crop cultivation turns a carbon sink into a carbon source with a long payback period, this is a constraint for achievement of bioenergy sustainability targets.
“If conversion of land to energy crop cultivation would turn a carbon sink into a carbon source with a long payback period this would have to be considered a constraint for the achievement of bioenergy sustainability targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The claim that cultivation of energy crops on degraded land or abandoned farmland safeguards against iLUC effects is only correct if there truly was no prior cultivation or other use of those lands.
“This however is only correct if there truly was no kind of cultivation or other use of those lands before.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Water footprints from bioenergy use and feedstock processing can potentially lead to conflicts with other land uses or ecosystem services if water is scarce.
“Water footprints might thus arise from the use of an area for bioenergy and from feedstock processing, potentially leading to conflicts with other types of land use or (non-marketable) ecosystem services if water is scarce (Bhardwaj et al. 2011;Fritsche et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bhardwaj et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fritsche et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
High nutrient use efficiency translates into an optimum N application rate of just 1.9 kg per dry tonne harvested biomass for Miscanthus.
“High nutrient use efficiency translates into an optimum N application rate of just 1.9 kg per dry tonne harvested biomass for Miscanthus (Boehmel et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boehmel et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There are regional differences in production costs depending amongst others on costs of land and labour.
“There are regional differences in production costs depending amongst others on costs of land and labour (Hoogwijk et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hoogwijk et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Rapid expansion of sugar cane and biodiesel production in Columbia and Brazil provide possible examples of a trade-off between economic growth and employment on one hand, and environmental pressure on other.
“Rapid expansion of sugar cane and biodiesel production in Columbia and Brazil provide possible examples of a trade-off between economic growth and employment on the one hand, and environmental pressure on the other (Faaij and Domac 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Faaij and Domac 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Cost-competitiveness of bioenergy crops under marginal production conditions presents a challenge for their economic viability since their cost frequently exceeds market price of energy they produce.
“Indeed, cost-competitiveness of bioenergy crops under marginal production conditions presents a challenge for their economic viability since their cost frequently exceeds the market price of the energy they produce (Monti and Askew 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Monti and Askew 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Primary energy consumption of 1.6 GJ per oven-dried tonne for pelleting is equivalent to 9% of biomass energy content.
“Primary energy consumption of 1.6 GJ per oven-dried tonne for pelleting is equivalent to 9% of biomass energy content (Smeets et al. 2009) -this is efficient compared with production of liquid biofuels that may use more energy than they produce (Pimentel 2003;The Royal Society 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
The benefit of energy forestry for biodiversity and ecosystem services is strongest where harvest times are varied across bioenergy fields.
“This benefit is strongest where harvest times are varied across bioenergy fields (Weih 2008;Smeets et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Weih 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pelleting is efficient compared with production of liquid biofuels that may use more energy than they produce.
“this is efficient compared with production of liquid biofuels that may use more energy than they produce (Pimentel 2003;The Royal Society 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Pimentel 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites The Royal Society 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Pellets may be transported long distances if production and use are located relatively close (10s of kms) to water transport hubs.
“Pelleting improves energy density, and pellets may be transported long distances if production and use are located relatively close (10s of kms) to water transport hubs (Faaij and Domac 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Faaij and Domac 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Human rights may also be adversely affected where bioenergy chains are developed rapidly in response to top-down targets and economic drivers.
“Human rights may also be adversely affected where bioenergy chains are developed rapidly in response to top-down targets and economic drivers (NCB 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites NCB 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Productivity and environmental benefits of energy crops can be greatly optimized when appropriate site-specific choices are made.
“Productivity and environmental benefits of energy crops can be greatly optimized when appropriate site-specific choices are made (Zegada-Lizarazu et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zegada-Lizarazu et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Economic forces and farmer flexibility considerations may favour planting of high yield annual crops on fertile soils, with poor environmental and socio-economic performance.
“Economic forces and farmer flexibility considerations may favour planting of high yield annual crops on fertile soils, with poor environmental and socio-economic performance (Boehmel et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Boehmel et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Perennial grasses such as Miscanthus and switchgrass have a considerably lower environmental footprint than annual crops.
“Perennial grasses such as Miscanthus and switchgrass for example have a considerably lower environmental footprint than annual crops (Faaij and Domac 2006;Boehmel et al. 2008;Smeets et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Faaij and Domac 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Boehmel et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
At a landscape level, planting 10-20% of energy forestry in open farmland can have considerable benefit for biodiversity and other ecosystem services such as erosion protection.
“At a landscape level the planting of 10-20% of energy forestry in open farmland for example can have a considerable benefit for biodiversity and other ecosystem services such as erosion protection (Börjesson 1999b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Börjesson 1999b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
As a consequence of lower yields from marginal or degraded lands and higher initial investment costs, lower margins can be expected.
“As a consequence of lower yields from marginal or degraded lands (see also Marginal yields from marginal or degraded land) and higher initial investment costs (soil preparation, irrigation), lower margins can be expected.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Land in the Conservation Reserve Program in Northern America is considered to potentially be available and suited for production of drought resistant perennial biomass crops such as switchgrass or other grassy biomass crops.
“In Northern America, land in the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), an environmental programme for protecting biodiversity, reducing soil erosion, protecting freshwater, and providing natural flood control (FAB-RI 2007), is considered to potentially be available and suited for the production of drought resistant perennial biomass crops such as switchgrass or other grassy biomass crops (Cook and B”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cook and Beyea 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Conflicts of interests between different stakeholders often result from a misconception of energy crops and their impacts.
“Conflicts of interests between different stakeholders often result from a misconception of energy crops and their impacts (cf.Weih 2009 for willow SRC in Sweden).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weih 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
If environmental compliances are not part of policy incentives for development of bioenergy or if their compliance is not enforced, land of high environmental value might get lost.
“If such environmental compliances are not part of policy incentives for the development of bioenergy or if their compliance is not enforced, land of high environmental value might get lost.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Sustainability objectives restrict cultivation of bioenergy crops in many marginal areas of Europe which are often characterised by traditional and low-intensity managed grasslands of high nature value and/or are part of Natura 2000 network.
“Those sustainability objectives restrict the cultivation of bioenergy crops in many marginal areas of Europe which are often characterised by traditional and low-intensity managed grasslands of high nature value and/or are part of the Natura 2000 network (EEA 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EEA 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Bioenergy is increasingly developing into a significant part of agricultural land use.
“Bioenergy is increasingly developing into a significant part of agricultural land use, which in turn will require more integrated energy, agriculture and land-use policies to circumvent adverse impacts of competition for land (Smith et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smith et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
These erosion rates are considerably higher than the upper limit for sustainable soil erosion in Europe of 1.4 t ha-1 yr-1 proposed by Verheijen et al. (2009).
“They are also considerably higher than the upper limit for sustainable soil erosion in Europe of 1.4 t ha -1 yr -1 proposed by Verheijen et al. (2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Verheijen et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Perennial grasses could provide benefits to environmental condition of CRP lands if harvested and managed appropriately.
“Those perennial grasses could even provide benefits to the environmental condition of those lands, if harvested and managed appropriately (Rosenberg and Smith 2009;Bhardwaj et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rosenberg and Smith 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bhardwaj et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Perennial grasslands in marginal areas, riparian habitats and even sites within protected areas (Natura 2000 sites) in Germany are increasingly transformed to cultivation of maize for biogas.
“This is currently happening in Germany, where perennial grasslands in marginal areas, riparian habitats and even sites within protected areas (Natura 2000 sites) are increasingly transformed to cultivation of maize for biogas (Ammermann 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ammermann 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Perennial crops are better bioenergy feedstock options from an environmental and socio-economic perspective than annual crops such as sugarbeet, maize or oilseed rape.
“Perennial crops, in this respect, are better bioenergy feedstock options from an environmental and socio-economic perspective than annual crops such as sugarbeet, maize or oilseed rape.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Old forest, species rich grassland or land with a high C stock such as wetlands and pristine peatlands do not count towards renewable energy targets.
“As such, old forest, species rich grassland or land with a high C stock such as wetlands and pristine peatlands, do not count towards the renewable energy targets (COM 2008, Berry andPaterson 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites COM 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Berry andPaterson 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Baler technology now exists for harvesting biomass from brushlands.
“Similarly, baler technology now exists for harvesting biomass from brushlands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anderson group 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Smeets et al. (2009) estimated erosion rates for Miscanthus and switchgrass of 2.6 to 7.7 t ha-1 yr-1 at annual rainfall rates of 400 mm to 1200 mm.
“Smeets et al. (2009) used the universal soil loss equation to estimate erosion rates for Miscanthus and switchgrass of 2.6 to 7.7 t ha -1 yr -1 at annual rainfall rates of 400 mm to 1200 mm.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Strong demand driven by subsidies and/or future market forces may result in indiscriminate mass planting, at the aggregate regional or industrial level.
“Strong demand driven by subsidies and/ or future market forces may result in indiscriminate mass planting, at the aggregate regional or industrial level.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Cultivation of soybeans for biodiesel had a significant negative effect on soil C and species abundance.
“In contrast, the cultivation of soybeans for biodiesel had a significant negative effect on soil C and species abundance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Dam et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 50
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationDeep roots and fast growth of perennial biomass crops result in high water uptake, and have been found to decrease effective rainfall by 50-60% compared with annual crops.
“The deep roots and fast growth of perennial biomass crops result in high water uptake, and have been found to decrease effective rainfall by 50-60% compared with annual crops (Stephens et al. 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Stephens et al. 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationReijnders and Huijbregts (2007) calculate that N2O emissions of 0.2-1.0t CO2 equiv.ha-1 yr-1, and soil carbon loss of 3.1 t CO2 equiv.ha-1 yr-1 for wheat and sugarbeet production equate to GHG emissions of 2.0-2.5 kg kg-1 ethanol and 0.6-0.9kg kg-1 ethanol, respectively.
“Reijnders and Huijbregts (2007) calculate that N 2 O emissions of 0.2-1.0t CO 2 equiv.ha -1 yr -1 , and soil carbon loss of 3.1 t CO 2 equiv.ha -1 yr -1 for wheat and sugarbeet production equate to GHG emissions of 2.0-2.5 kg kg -1 ethanol and 0.6-0.9kg kg -1 ethanol, respectively, from the two crops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reijnders and Huijbregts 2007
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationLow-yield energy crop production on marginal lands is clearly uneconomic.
“Soldatos et al. (2011) found that low-yield energy crop production on marginal lands is clearly uneconomic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Soldatos et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationWhile bioethanol production costs from feedstock grown in the Netherlands are uncompetitive with petrol, the cost of second generation ethanol production from Miscanthus grown on low grade agricultural land was calculated to be lower than the cost of ethanol production from sugarbeet grown on high grade agricultural land.
“Meanwhile, whilst van der Hilst et al. (2010) found bioethanol production costs from feedstock grown in the Netherlands to be uncompetitive with petrol, the cost of second generation ethanol production from Miscanthus grown on low grade agricultural land was calculated to be lower than the cost of ethanol production from sugarbeet grown on high grade agricultural land.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van der Hilst et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Global Total Primary Energy Supply was about 509 EJ yr-1 in 2009.
“In comparison, the Global Total Primary Energy Supply (i.e. the sum of all energy resources worldwide) was estimated to be about 509 EJ yr -1 in 2009 (IEA 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites IEA 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAmbiguity in the definition and characterization of surplus land and uncertainty in assessments of land availability and future bioenergy potentials is causing confusion about the prospects and environmental and socio-economic implications of bioenergy development on surplus land.
“Ambiguity in the definition and characterization of surplus land as well as uncertainty in assessments of land availability and of future bioenergy potentials is causing confusion about the prospects and the environmental and socio-economic implications of bioenergy development in those areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCategorizing or quantifying marginal lands underlies great uncertainties and results in wide-ranging estimates of availability and suitability for bioenergy crops.
“Therefore, categorizing or quantifying marginal lands underlies great uncertainties and results in wide-ranging estimates of availability and suitability for bioenergy crops (Dale et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dale et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe high level of uncertainty about bioenergy development on surplus land is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet taken into account and to the potentials offered by novel crops and their production methods not being fully exploited.
“The high level of uncertainty is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet taken into account and to the potentials offered by those novel crops and their production methods not being fully exploited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationBMVBS (2010) calculated a global technical potential in 2020 of 15 EJ from agricultural land, 36 to 57 EJ from forestry and 30 EJ from residues like straw, excrements or organic waste.
“A moderate estimation of bioenergy potential not explicitly considering degraded lands was given by BMVBS (2010), calculating a global technical potential in 2020 of 15 EJ from agricultural land, 36 to 57 EJ from forestry and 30 EJ from residues like straw, excrements or organic waste.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites BMVBS (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThere are no scientific studies at present that resolve the scientific challenges related to the assessment of future bioenergy potentials.
“Haberl et al. (2010), in a critical review of modelling and calculation approaches, conclude that there are no scientific studies at present that resolve the scientific challenges related to the assessment of future bioenergy potentials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haberl et al. (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWaste land cannot be cultivated under conventional conditions and is usually not suitable for production of dedicated energy crops.
“Due to the boundaries of cultivation as set by climate and soil, these areas cannot be cultivated under conventional conditions and, therefore, are usually not suitable for production of dedicated energy crops (Wiegmann et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wiegmann et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLow yields may increase the need for input of investment, labour and resources, affecting the energy balance such that the energy return on investment could easily become critical.
“Low yields may further increase the need for input of investment, labour and resources, affecting the energy balance such that the energy return on investment (EROI) could easily become critical.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationEnergy crop production on marginal or degraded lands might enrich certain landscape values such as structural heterogeneity or aesthetics if planted not as landscape-wide monoculture but in smaller plots, but might still generate conflicts with biodiversity conservation.
“Although energy crop production on marginal or degraded lands might enrich certain landscape values such as structural heterogeneity or aesthetics (Fernando 2005) if planted not as landscape-wide monoculture but in smaller plots, it might still generate conflicts with biodiversity conservation (Plieninger and Gaertner 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Fernando 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Plieninger and Gaertner 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRestricting the production of dedicated biomass crops to arable land in order to prevent conversion of permanent grassland could aggravate the food/energy conflict and stimulate increased indirect land-use change.
“Restricting the production of dedicated biomass crops to arable land in order to prevent the conversion of permanent grassland could however aggravate the food/energy-conflict and stimulate increased iLUC.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMarginal yields could entail a high land-take for energy crops to match existing or targeted demand for feedstock, which could result in conflicts with pastoralism and lands of high nature value as well as indirect land-use change.
“Marginal yields could entail a high land-take for energy crops to match the existing or targeted demand for the respective feedstock.This again could result in conflicts for example with pastoralism and lands of high nature value as well as in indirect land-use change (iLUC; see Indirect land-use change).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEnergy crops suitable for less productive soils can be used primarily for second generation biofuels, as far as refineries are an economically viable option in areas characterised by less productive soil.
“Consequently, such crops can be used primarily for second generation biofuels, as far as refineries are an economically viable option in areas characterised by less productive soil.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone givenMarginal lands often have poor and heterogeneous soils and are situated at transition zones between highly fertile crop land and vulnerable ecosystems, restricting possibilities for conventional agricultural management.
“Marginal lands often have poor and heterogeneous soils and are situated at “transition zones” between highly fertile crop land and vulnerable ecosystems like protected natural sites, restricting the possibilities for conventional agricultural management.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPreventing the abandonment and intensification of High Nature Value farmland is a key action to halt the decline of biodiversity in Europe.
“Preventing the abandonment and intensification of HNV farmland is beheld as a key action to halt the decline of biodiversity in Europe (EEA 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites EEA 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDespite recent findings that short-rotation coppice and perennial grass crops can potentially benefit farm-scale biodiversity, establishment of perennial biomass crops on land other than arable fields is still regarded as a threat rather than a benefit to biodiversity.
“Despite recent findings that SRC and perennial grass crops can potentially benefit farm-scale biodiversity (Dauber et al. 2010;Rowe et al. 2011;Emmerson et al. 2011), establishment of perennial biomass crops on land other than arable fields is still regarded as a threat rather than a benefit to biodiversity (BfN 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Dauber et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Rowe et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Emmerson et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLower yields may concentrate nutrients such as nitrogen, compromising use for combustion purposes due to higher NOx emissions.
“Lower yields may also concentrate nutrients, such as nitrogen, compromising its use for combustion purposes, for example, due to higher NO x emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenProduction of crops for bioenergy from marginal, degraded and abandoned lands is inadequately documented and only a small amount of data from demonstration or modelling projects is available.
“Yet, the production of crops for bioenergy from those land classes is inadequately documented and only a small amount of data from demonstration or modelling projects is available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationOn degraded land, two major constraints of biomass production are the large efforts and long time period required for reclamation of degraded land and the low productivity levels of these soils.
“On degraded land, two major constraints of biomass production are the large efforts and long time period required for the reclamation of degraded land and the low productivity levels of these soils (Dornburg et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dornburg et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenEnergy crops suitable for less productive soils are typically optimized for maximum biomass and not for sugar or oil content.
“Typically, energy crops suitable for less productive soils are optimized for maximum biomass and not for sugar or oil content.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationEstimates of high yields of mixtures of native grassland perennials from agriculturally degraded lands in Northern America are questioned on the basis of potential nutrient losses from the system, high expenditures for weed control and an overestimation of availability of such degraded lands.
“Estimates of high yields of mixtures of native grassland perennials from agriculturally degraded lands in Northern America are questioned on the basis of potential nutrient losses from the system, high expenditures for weed control and an overestimation of availability of such degraded lands (Russelle et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Russelle et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDegradation generally results in low yield potentials, low yield levels and low nutrient efficiency with risk of harvest loss.
“Degradation generally results in low yield potentials, low yield levels and low nutrient efficiency with risk of harvest loss (Cofie and Penning de Vries 2002).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cofie and Penning de Vries 2002
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe quality of biomass from semi-natural grasslands depends on the meadow type, with different qualities required for biogas and combustion.
“Nevertheless, the quality of the respective biomass depends on the meadow type, with different qualities required for biogas and combustion (Heinsoo et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Heinsoo et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBiofuels in the EU must deliver current GHG savings of at least 35% compared with fossil fuels, rising to 50% in 2017 and 60% for new crops in 2018.
“Biofuels must deliver current GHG savings of at least 35% compared with fossil fuels, rising to 50% in 2017 and to 60%, for biofuels from new crops, in 2018 (Europa 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Europa 2010
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationcitationThe finding that conservation grasslands with higher plant species numbers had lower biomass and ethanol yields could stimulate management of those grasslands towards low diversity systems, excluding species with undesirable fermentation characteristics.
“This finding could stimulate the management of those grasslands towards low diversity systems, excluding species with undesirable fermentation characteristics.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationGrowing energy crops predominately in marginal areas might cause long distance transport of feedstock if processing plants are centralised and distant, which could make net gains in energy and CO2-neutrality disappear.
“This could induce relatively long distance transport of the bioenergy feedstock in cases where processing plants are centralised and distant from production areas.Long transport distances of bioenergy feedstock could make net gains in energy and CO 2 -neutrality disappear (Giller et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giller et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIncreased bioenergy production can lead to price increases for all agricultural raw materials competing for scarce production factors, which could result in expansion of arable land into areas marginal for agricultural production under current conditions.
“Furthermore, increased bioenergy production can lead to price increases for all agricultural raw materials competing for scarce production factors, which could result in an expansion of arable land into areas that are marginal for agricultural production under current conditions (Bringezu et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bringezu et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA negative socio-economic effect which may be associated with iLUC and a shift of agricultural production towards marginal lands is large-scale privatization of lands by most capitalized producers which may lead to displacement of smallholder farmers and whole rural communities.
“A negative socio-economic effect which may be associated with iLUC and a shift of agricultural production towards marginal lands is a large-scale privatization of lands by the most capitalized producers which may lead to the displacement of smallholder farmers and whole rural communities (Howarth et al. 2009;Beringer et al. 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Howarth et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Beringer et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Zimbabwe, on lower grade lands with customary tenure, most land rights are held by traditional leaders, giving very limited land rights to farmers.
“On those lower grade lands there is customary tenure, which gives very limited land rights to farmers; most of the land rights are held by traditional leaders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jingura et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationN2O emissions stimulated by fertiliser application during cultivation offset displaced fossil energy GHG emissions.
“Another argument against bioenergy is that emissions of the potent GHG N 2 O stimulated by fertiliser application during cultivation offset displaced fossil energy GHG emissions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reijnders and Huijbregts 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationConservation grasslands in the USA with higher numbers of plant species had lower biomass yields and a lower ethanol yield per unit biomass compared with sites with fewer species.
“However, contradictory results were documented by Adler et al. (2009) who showed that conservation grasslands in the USA with higher numbers of plant species had lower biomass yields and a lower ethanol yield per unit biomass compared with sites with fewer species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Adler et al. (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLack of operational tools for full impact assessments is impeding fulfilment of agreed goal of sustainability in bioenergy development.
“The lack of operational tools for full impact assessments is impeding the fulfilment of the agreed goal of sustainability in bioenergy development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationProductive use of degraded lands will often require substantial investment in irrigation, which is a particular concern as irrigation for agriculture already accounts for over 70% of freshwater extraction globally.
“Productive use of degraded lands will often require substantial investment in irrigation which is a particular concern, as irrigation for agriculture already accounts for over 70 % of freshwater extraction globally (Howarth et al. 2009;UNESCO 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Howarth et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites UNESCO 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone givenUnchecked market-driven expansion of bioenergy production could culminate in industrial scale bioenergy chains involving thousands of hectares of cultivation centred on large processing and energy conversion plants, with negative environmental and socio-economic consequences.
“Meanwhile, unchecked market-driven expansion of bioenergy production could culminate in industrial scale bioenergy chains involving thousands of hectares of cultivation centred on large processing and energy conversion plants, with negative environmental and socio-economic consequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn developed countries wages for bioenergy workers are equivalent to other technical qualified workers, whilst in developing countries workers are often paid below average wages.
“Faaij and Domac (2006) distinguish between high-value employment and low value employment generated by bioenergy supply chains, noting that in developed countries wages for bioenergy workers are equivalent to other technical qualified workers, whilst in developing countries workers are often paid below average wages.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Faaij and Domac 2006
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenHigh quality employment can only be financed through high economic viability of a production system.
“Nevertheless, high quality employment can only be financed through high economic viability of a production system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationSmall scale decentralised bioenergy cropping on land marginal for food production could be operated at a subsistence level to support local communities in developing countries, but would result in a modest gain in global energy resources only.
“Meanwhile, from a social perspective, small scale decentralised bioenergy cropping on land marginal for food production could be operated at a subsistence level to support local communities in developing countries, as described in relation to the use of crop residues via small-scale gasification (Mendu et al. 2012).This would however result in a modest gain in global energy resources only.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mendu et al. 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn perennial cropping systems, the need for boosting actions may be lower because many processes providing essential services are operating naturally and most perennial systems probably can utilize ecological processes more efficiently than annual systems.
“In perennial cropping systems, the need for boosting actions may be lower, because many of the processes providing these services are operating naturally and most perennial systems probably can utilize ecological processes more efficiently than annual systems (Jordan et al. 2007;Weih et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jordan et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weih et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPellets can be used in small scale local heating systems as well as in medium size commercial power plants, making pelleting adaptable to a wide size-range of bioenergy enterprises.
“As pellets could be used in small scale local heating systems as well as in medium size commercial power plants, this type of biomass processing is adaptable to a wide size-range of bioenergy enterprises.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationPerennial crops offer numerous environmental advantages and provide a wider range of ecosystem services compared with annual crops.
“Perennial crops offer numerous environmental advantages, and provide a wider range of ecosystem services, compared with annual crops.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Börjesson 1999b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Weih 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationFor industrial-scale bioenergy cropping, lower margins might necessitate cheap labour, which in turn has consequences for social structure of local communities.
“For industrial-scale bioenergy cropping in particular, this might necessitate cheap labour which in turn has consequences for the social structure of the local communities (Giller et al. 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Giller et al. 2007
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningIt is likely that perennial biomass crops may often be a better choice than annual crops to achieve reasonable biomass production along with maintaining high cropping security, enhancing energy and GHG balances and maximizing positive effects on biodiversity.
“It is therefore likely that perennial biomass crops may often be a better choice than annual crops to achieve reasonable biomass production along with maintaining high cropping security, enhancing energy and GHG balances and maximizing the positive effects on biodiversity (but see Spangenberg and Settele 2009b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Spangenberg and Settele 2009b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningIn that case, bioenergy production might mitigate or even reverse the constraining factors in the respective areas.
“In that case, bioenergy production might mitigate or even reverse the constraining factors in the respective areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenIf constraints and their implications are assessed properly and accounted for, options for sustainable bioenergy production can be identified and developed.
“In this section we demonstrate that, if the constraints and their implications are assessed properly and accounted for, options for sustainable bioenergy production can be identified and developed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnregulated land ownership, fragmented property, low level of education, institutional constraints, low level of marketing opportunities, competition for land or biomass and poor or lack of infrastructure can both hinder land rehabilitation and increase production costs.
“Unregulated land ownership, fragmented property, low level of education, institutional constraints, low level of marketing opportunities, competition for land or biomass and poor or lack of infrastructure can both hinder land rehabilitation and increase production costs (Sugrue 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sugrue 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBioenergy chains based on pelleting of perennial grasses can result in GHG reductions compared with fossil fuel chains when annual cropping or grassland is replaced and net GHG reductions when natural vegetation is considered as the reference land use.
“in GHG reductions compared with fossil fuel chains when annual cropping or grassland is replaced and net GHG reductions when natural vegetation is considered as the reference land use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe high level of uncertainty is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet systematically taken into account and due to not making the most out of the potentials and elbowroom offered by novel crops and their production methods.
“The high level of uncertainty is on the one hand due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet systematically taken into account and on the other hand due to not making the most out of the potentials and the elbowroom offered by novel crops and their production methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningRelating socioeconomic factors to pressures is complicated by international trade and transboundary pressures.
“However, relating socioeconomic factors to pressures is complicated by international trade and transboundary pressures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGermany alone, already being a net importer of agricultural land, would require a net additional land area of 2.5-3.4 Mha by 2030, mainly driven by current policy targets on biofuel.
“They found that Germany alone, already being a net importer of agricultural land, would require a net additional land area of 2.5-3.4Mha by 2030, mainly driven by current policy targets on biofuel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bringezu et al. (2009)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningA bottom-up approach can only be successful if there is sufficient demand, which may require top-down initiatives on the demand side of the bioenergy chain.
“But, a bottom-up approach can only be successful if there is sufficient demand, which may require top-down initiatives on the demand side of the bioenergy chain.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThree principal challenges to achieving yield improvement in biomass crops were identified by Karp and Shield (2008) to be a reduction in thermal threshold in order to extend the growing season, an increase in above ground biomass without depletion in below ground biomass and without causing water depletion.
“Three principal challenges to achieving yield improvement in biomass crops were identified by Karp and Shield (2008) to be a reduction in thermal threshold in order to extend the growing season, an increase in above ground biomass without depletion in below ground biomass and without causing water depletion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Karp and Shield (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGlobal scale data on land use, land property, climate and soil are often too coarse to provide reliable assessments that could be applied in local or regional land-use planning.
“Global scale data on land use, land property, climate and soil are often too coarse to provide reliable assessments that could be applied in local or regional land-use planning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationHarvesting biomass from brushlands is often beneficial for reducing fire hazards and herbicide usage and restoring wildlife habitats.
“Such harvesting is often beneficial for reducing fire hazards and herbicide usage and restoring wildlife habitats (Anderson group 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anderson group 2011
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese erosion rates were less than one third of rates calculated for annual crops, but twice those calculated for grassland, and over ten times those calculated for deciduous forest.
“These erosion rates were less than one third of the rates calculated for annual crops, but twice those calculated for grassland, and over ten times those calculated for deciduous forest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Smeets et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLocal and regional bioenergy chains to generate heat, electricity and CHP would be more advantageous than globalised liquid biofuel chains.
“Local and regional bioenergy chains to generate heat, electricity and CHP would be more advantageous than globalised liquid biofuel chains.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningFor most areas of potential study, there is a net import or export of food and energy that requires macroeconomic assumptions to attribute impacts.
“For most areas of potential study, there is a net import or export of food and energy that requires macroeconomic assumptions to attribute impacts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningEstimates of availability and suitability of surplus land for development of energy crop production or use of existing biomass potentials are uncertain.
“So far, estimates of availability and suitability of surplus land for development of energy crop production or use of existing biomass potentials are uncertain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationApproaches have been developed to represent difficult to quantify impacts arising from cultivation of energy crops, such as biodiversity loss or GHG emissions, or integration of market models that quantify displacement and expansion effects, into consequential LCA models.
“Approaches have been developed to represent difficult to quantify impacts arising from the cultivation of energy crops, such as biodiversity loss or GHG emissions (e.g.Fargione et al. 2010;Urban et al. 2011), or integration of market models that quantify displacement and expansion effects (Reinhard and Zah 2009;Reinhard and Zah 2011), into consequential LCA models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fargione et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Urban et al. 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reinhard and Zah 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLocal socio-economic drivers are influenced by socio-economic drivers at regional and global scales that may also affect local biodiversity directly through pollution and GHG emissions.
“In addition, local socio-economic drivers are influenced by socio-economic drivers at regional and global scales that may also affect local biodiversity directly through pollution and GHG emissions (Haberl et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haberl et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWoody perennial biomass crops are likely to host diverse microbial communities including mycorrhizas, which can improve both biomass productivity and cropping security, and at the same time increase soil biodiversity.
“For example, woody perennial biomass crops are likely to host diverse microbial communities including mycorrhizas, which can improve both biomass productivity and cropping security, and at the same time increase soil biodiversity (Rooney et al. 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rooney et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSwitchgrass cultivation on non-degraded grassland has a neutral effect on soil C stocks and a positive effect on biodiversity (MSA) in Argentina, compared with a small negative effect on MSA when displacing natural vegetation.
“Van Dam et al. (2009) report that switchgrass cultivation on non-degraded grassland has a neutral effect on soil C stocks and a positive effect on biodiversity, estimated by 'Mean Species Abundance' (MSA; see http://www.globio.info/what-is- globio/how-it-works/impact-on-biodiversity for definition), in Argentina, compared with a small negative effect on MSA when displacing natural vegetation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van Dam et al. 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne barrier to development of more sustainable bioenergy chains based on low-input perennial biomass crops is the cost of establishment combined with a long payback period, which could be overcome by diverse forms of financial support.
“One barrier to the development of more sustainable bioenergy chains based on low-input perennial biomass crops is the cost of establishment combined with a long payback period, which could be overcome by diverse forms of financial support (Sherrington et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sherrington et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationReliability of data used in some LCAs is called into question.
“Still more work is needed to further improve LCA, in particular as the reliability of data used in some LCAs is called into question (e.g.St. Clair et al. 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites St. Clair et al. 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThere is a high potential for Miscanthus cultivation on grassland soils in relation to economic competitiveness and land availability in the Netherlands, but high uncertainty surrounding economic performance of pasture land.
“Van der Hilst (2010) suggest that there is a high potential for Miscanthus cultivation on grassland soils, in relation to economic competitiveness and land availability in the Netherlands, but that there is high uncertainty surrounding the economic performance of pasture land.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Van der Hilst (2010)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA slowdown in introduction of biofuels, at least until adequate and effective controls addressing effects such as displacement are implemented in bioenergy policies, would reduce impact of dedicated energy crops on food commodity prices with detrimental effects upon the poor.
“A slowdown in the introduction of biofuels, at least until adequate and effective controls addressing effects such as displacement are implemented in bioenergy policies, would reduce the impact of dedicated energy crops on for example food commodity prices with their detrimental effects upon the poor (RFA 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites RFA 2008
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRapid bioenergy development driven by indiscriminate incentives arising from a top-down approach can result in feedstock production that violates land rights and results in poor socio-economic and environmental performance.
“Rapid bioenergy development driven by indiscriminate incentives arising from a top-down approach (e.g.political biofuels targets) can result in feedstock production that violates land rights and results in poor socio-economic and environmental performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEncouraging smaller-scale bottom-up development of bioenergy chains can maximise socio-economic benefits, and could also help to achieve a more dispersed pattern of development.
“Encouraging smaller-scale bottom-up development of bioenergy chains instead can maximise socio-economic benefits, and could also help to achieve a more dispersed pattern of development.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMost energy crops currently cultivated are largely undomesticated and at early stages of development, so plant breeding and identification of proper cultivars could significantly improve their productivity when grown under marginal conditions.
“As most of the energy crops currently cultivated are largely undomesticated and at their early stages of development, plant breeding and identification of proper cultivars could significantly improve their productivity when grown under marginal conditions (Zegada-Lizarazu et al. 2010).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Zegada-Lizarazu et al. 2010
Not checked in the free run.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Bioenergy developments will have a fundamental impact on the respective surplus lands.
“The basic assumption of our discussion is that bioenergy developments will have a fundamental impact on the respective surplus lands, as reaching the bioenergy targets set by many countries would require landscape-scale changes of land use.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Reaching the bioenergy targets set by many countries would require landscape-scale changes of land use.
“The basic assumption of our discussion is that bioenergy developments will have a fundamental impact on the respective surplus lands, as reaching the bioenergy targets set by many countries would require landscape-scale changes of land use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Area limitation and harvest time variation reduce economic viability of energy forestry.
“However, as both area limitation and harvest time variation reduce economic viability, careful ex ante planning is required.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Land may often be marginal for agricultural production because of environmental conditions which expose plants to abiotic stress from drought, flooding or extreme temperatures.
“Land may often be marginal for agricultural production because of environmental conditions which expose plants to abiotic stress from drought, flooding or extreme temperatures.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Historically, breeding goals most often target short-term events to enhance productivity or fight potential pests, and build on high-input systems along with frequent application of chemicals for weed and pest control.
“Historically, breeding goals most often target short-term events (e.g.single physiological processes) to enhance productivity or fight potential pests, and build on highinput systems along with the frequent application of chemicals for weed and pest control.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Local demand can be satisfied by the use of biomass in small boilers, in biomass-CHP plants and in anaerobic digestion-CHP plants.
“Local demand can be satisfied by the use of biomass in small boilers, in biomass-CHP plants and in anaerobic digestion-CHP plants.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Transport distances informed by information or assumptions on the spatial distribution of cultivation, conversion and final use locations are an important component of LCA necessary to assess the sustainability of bioenergy cultivation in a certain area.
“Transport distances informed by information or assumptions on the spatial distribution of cultivation, conversion and final use locations are an important component of LCA necessary to assess the sustainability of bioenergy cultivation in a certain area.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pelleting improves energy density.
“Pelleting improves energy density, and pellets may be transported long distances if production and use are located relatively close (10s of kms) to water transport hubs (Faaij and Domac 2006).”
The paper relies on this without support.
Such site-specific choices are of particular importance for surplus land which is often characterised by environmental constraints for energy crop cultivation such as soil fertility, water availability, soil carbon stocks, erosion or location within natural sensitive areas.
“Such site-specific choices are of particular importance for surplus land which is often characterised by environmental constraints for energy crop cultivation such as soil fertility, water availability, soil carbon stocks, erosion or location within natural sensitive areas.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many processes that provide essential services in natural systems, such as organic nutrient cycling, pollination, predation, etc., need to be artificially boosted in cropping systems to achieve adequate yield in cropping.
“Many processes that provide essential services in natural systems, such as organic nutrient cycling, pollination, predation, etc., need to be artificially boosted in cropping systems to achieve adequate yield in cropping.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The boosting actions, mostly the use of herbicides and pesticides, frequently result in negative impact on biodiversity.
“The boosting actions, mostly the use of herbicides and pesticides, frequently result in negative impact on biodiversity.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Plant breeding is also of vital importance for the environmental benefits they have and for improving the yields they deliver.
“In addition to improving crop performance by choosing the most appropriate crop types for the respective characteristics of surplus land, plant breeding is also of vital importance for the environmental benefits they have and for improving the yields they deliver.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Bioenergy production is to a large extent driven by environmental goals.
“Bioenergy production is to a large extent driven by environmental goals and, as a consequence, bioenergy plans need to be optimised from an environmental perspective.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most land could be considered as 'available' for bioenergy production as long as the caveats elaborated earlier are sufficiently taken into account.
“As such, most land could be considered as 'available' for bioenergy production as long as the caveats elaborated earlier are sufficiently taken into account, the choice then being how to best use the land for bioenergy production.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Harvesting of the existing vegetation would allow the land to remain in communal ownership while providing an 'alternative' source of income for the community.
“Harvesting of the existing vegetation would allow the land to remain in communal ownership while providing an 'alternative' source of income for the community.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In some instances, a positive environmental effect may be achieved by using the vegetation already growing on the land for bioenergy rather than using the land for the cultivation of energy crops.
“In some instances, a positive environmental effect may be achieved by using the vegetation already growing on the land for bioenergy rather than using the land for the cultivation of energy crops.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Use of grassland biomass already growing on CRP land, instead of converting the land to perennial grassy crops, might further minimize environmental degradation while improving the productivity of the land.
“The use of grassland biomass already growing on CRP land, instead of converting the land to perennial grassy crops, might further minimize environmental degradation while improving the productivity of the land.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the last 30 years the term marginal land is frequently used interchangeably with other terms such as unproductive lands, waste lands, underutilized lands, idle lands, abandoned lands, or degraded lands.
“In the last 30 years the term “marginal land” is frequently used interchangeably with other terms such as “unproductive lands,” “waste lands,” “underutilized lands,” “idle lands,” “abandoned lands,” or “degraded lands” (Dauber et al., 2012;FAO, 1976;Lal, 1991;Tógyer, 2012;Wiegmann et al., 2008)”
From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Dauber et al., 2012
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Heinsoo citation year differs from reference
MinorThe text cites Heinsoo et al. as a 2009 publication, but the listed reference on Estonian semi-natural grasslands is dated 2010.
“In Estonia for example, such subsidies cover losses in production amounting to ca. 65 GJ ha -1 placing the income from semi-natural grasslands in the same range as that from more intensively managed dedicated energy crops with an energy yield of ca. 100 GJ ha -1 (Heinsoo et al. 2009).”
“Heinsoo K, Melts I, Sammul M, Holm B (2010) The potential of Estonian semi-natural grass- lands for bioenergy production.”
Soldatos citation year differs from reference
MinorThe text cites Soldatos et al. as a 2011 publication, but the corresponding reference is dated 2010.
“Soldatos et al. (2011) found that low-yield energy crop production on marginal lands is clearly uneconomic.”
“Soldatos P, Lychnaras V, Panoutsou P, Cosentino LS (2010) Economic viability of energy crops in the EU: the farmer's point of view.”
DeHaan citation year differs from reference
MinorThe text cites DeHaan et al. as a 2009 publication, but the corresponding reference is dated 2010.
“DeHaan et al. (2009) suggest that first biofuel crop breeding programs for low-input systems are likely to accelerate progress by focusing on grass-legume bicultures to maximize biomass yields.”
“DeHaan LR, Weisberg S, Tilman D, Fornara D (2010) Agricultural and biofuel implications of a species diversity experiment with native perennial grassland plants.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 157 · Cited by 206
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Beaufoy G (2011) HNV farming policy -progress to-date and future challenges. In: Ó hUal- lacháin D, Finn J (Eds) Conserving farmland biodiversity, Lessons learned & future prospects. Teagasc Biodiversity Conference, Wexford (Ireland), May 2011. Teagasc (Carlow), 10-14.
- Britt C, Garstang J (Eds) (2002) Bioenergy crops and bioremediation -a review. Report by ADAS for the Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs: 1-134.
- Emmerson M, Bourke D, Dauber J, O'Rourke E, Stanley D, Thompson R, Whelan P, Stout J (2011) The food versus fuel debate -what effect will replacing traditional crops with Miscanthus x giganteus have on farmland biodiversity? In: Ó hUallacháin D, Finn J (Eds) Conserving farmland biodiversity, Lessons learned & future prospects. Teagasc Biodiversity Conference, Wexford (Ireland), May 2011. Teagasc (Carlow), 58-59.
- Europa: Commission sets up system for certifying sustainable biofuels. Press release 10 June 2010. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/711&format=HT ML&aged=0&language=en&guiLanguage=en European Union (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Official Journal of the Eu- ropean Union L 140/16: 1-47.
- Fernando ALAC (2005) Fitorremediação por Miscanthus x giganteus de solos contaminados com metais pesados, PHD Thesis Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Lisbon).
- NCB (2011) Biofuels: Ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (UK). http://www.nuf- fieldbioethics.org/chapter-downloads
- RFA (2008) The Gallagher Review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. Renewable Fuels Agency (St Leonards-on-Sea): 1-92. http://www.bioenergy.org.nz/documents/liq- uidbiofuels/Report_of_the_Gallagher_review.pdf
- Schroers JO (2006) Zur Entwicklung der Landnutzung auf Grenzstandorten in Abhängigkeit agrarmarktpolitischer, agrarstrukturpolitischer und produktions-technologischer Rahmen- bedingungen. PhD Thesis, University of Giessen (Giessen). http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/ volltexte/2007/4511/
- Sugrue A (2008) Bioenergy production on marginal and degraded land: the potential social impacts. Draft paper for presentation to the joint international workshop on high nature value criteria and potential for sustainable use of degraded land. Paris (France) June and July 2008: 1-8. http://www.unep.fr/energy/activities/mapping/pdf/social.pdf
- Weih M (2009) Willow short rotation coppice commercially grown on agricultural land in Sweden -possibilities for improvement of biodiversity and landscape design. IEA Technical Review No. 4: 1-36. http://www.shortrotationcrops.org
- Wicke B (2011) Bioenergy production on degraded and marginal land -Assessing its poten- tials, economic performance, and environmental impacts for different settings and geo- graphical scales. PhD Thesis. Utrecht University (Utrecht). http://nws.chem.uu.nl/publi- ca/Publicaties%202011/Proefschrift_Wicke.pdf
- Wiegmann K, Hennenberg KJ, Fritsche UR (2008) Degraded Land and Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production. Issue Paper of the Joint International Workshop on High Nature Value Criteria and Potential for Sustainable Use of Degraded Lands, Paris. Oeko-Institut (Darmstadt): 1-10.
- Yan LZ, Zhang L, Wang SQ, Hu L (2008) Potential yield of bioethanol from energy crops and their regional distribution in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 24: 213-216.
- Authors
- Dauber, J., Brown, C., Fernando, A. L., Finnan, J., Krasuska, E., Ponitka, J., Styles, D., Thrän, D., Van Groenigen, K. J., Weih, M., & Zah, R.
- Affiliations
- Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
- Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
- Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DE)
- Bangor University (GB)
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
- Northern Arizona University (US)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Dauber, Jens
- Venue
- BioRisk
- Publisher
- Pensoft Publishers
- Published
- 2012-10-17
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 5-50
- ISSN
- 1313-2644 (ISSN-L)
- 1313-2652
- OpenAlex
- W2165407048
- Semantic Scholar
- f0ba7e637b97c208169d7442d2365c4346542ef7
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 157
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 33.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BIORISK – Biodiversity and Ecosystem Risk Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ZooKeys (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- European Science Foundation
- European Social Fund
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- bioenergy, surplus land, land use conflicts, dedicated energy crops, food versus fuel, land availability, sustainable bioenergy, socio-economic impacts, environmental impact, bioenergy policy, energy security, climate change mitigation, biodiversity and ecosystem services
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review