Cited by 206Bioenergy crop production and managementBioeconomy and Sustainability DevelopmentBiofuel production and bioconversion

Bioenergy from “surplus” land: environmental and socio-economic implications

Open access
Dauber, Jens, Brown, Chris, Fernando, Ana Luisa, Finnan, John, Krasuska, Ewa, Ponitka, Jens, Styles, David, Thrän, Daniela +3 more·2012·BioRisk

Abstract

The increasing demand for biomass for the production of bioenergy is generating land-use conflicts. These conflicts might be solved through spatial segregation of food/feed and energy producing areas by continuing producing food on established and productive agricultural land while growing dedicated energy crops on so called “surplus” land. Ambiguity in the definition and characterization of surplus land as well as uncertainty in assessments of land availability and of future bioenergy potentials is causing confusion about the prospects and the environmental and socio-economic implications of bioenergy development in those areas. The high level of uncertainty is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet taken into account and to the potentials offered by those novel crops and their production methods not being fully exploited. This paper provides a scientific background in support of a reassessment of land available for bioenergy production by clarifying the terminology, identifying constraints and options for an efficient bioenergy-use of surplus land and providing policy recommendations for resolving conflicting land-use demands. A serious approach to factoring in the constraints, combined with creativity in utilizing the options provided, in our opinion, would lead to a more sustainable and efficient development of the bioenergy sector. Unless the sustainability challenge is mastered, the interdependent policy objectives of mitigating climate change, obtaining independence from fossil fuels, feeding and fuelling a growing human world population and maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem services will not be met. Despite the advanced developments of bioenergy, we still see regional solutions for designing and establishing sustainable bioenergy production systems with optimized production resulting in social, economic and ecological benefits. Where bioenergy production has been identified as the most suitable option to overcome the given problems of energy security and climate change mitigation, we need to determine which bioenergy cultivation systems are most suitable for the respective types of surplus land, by taking into account issues such as yields, inputs and costs, as well as potential environmental and socio-economic impacts.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review argues that “surplus” land for bioenergy is ambiguously defined and that assessments often overestimate its availability by omitting environmental, economic, and social constraints. It maps those constraints and identifies planning, rural-development, nature-conservation, reclamation, crop-choice, and breeding options for more sustainable bioenergy, with policy recommendations.

Key findings

  • Global bioenergy land potentials range from 250 Mha to 1,580 Mha, with associated bioenergy potentials from 0 EJ to about 250 EJ, driven by yield assumptions of 1–33 t dry matter ha⁻¹ yr⁻¹ and differing restrictions. A moderate estimate for 2020 gives 15 EJ from agricultural land, 36–57 EJ from forestry, and 30 EJ from residues, compared with a global total primary energy supply of about 509 EJ yr⁻¹ in 2009.
  • Yields on marginal or degraded land are typically lower: for most crops, yields on very suitable soils were up to three times greater than on marginal soils; Jatropha may yield 0.1–12.5 t ha⁻¹ depending on water availability.
  • Constraints include biodiversity and high nature value farmland conflicts, indirect land-use change (iLUC), water footprint (perennial biomass crops can decrease effective rainfall by 50–60% versus annual crops; irrigation already accounts for over 70% of freshwater extraction globally), GHG/soil carbon trade-offs, and socio-economic risks such as displacement and low economic viability.
  • Options include active landscape-scale planning, improving rural development, sustaining high nature value farming, halting degradation and reclaiming land, choosing site-appropriate perennial crops, and plant breeding for low-input/marginal conditions; the paper recommends slowing bioenergy expansion, improving baseline data, applying knowledge to appraisals, and implementing planning and steering tools.

Methods

  • Design: critical review and conceptual synthesis aimed at clarifying “surplus land” terminology, identifying constraints and options for bioenergy production, and providing policy recommendations.
  • Data/sample: no primary empirical sample; the paper draws on cited literature and quantitative estimates from other studies, and arose from the ESF Exploratory Workshop EW09-076 held in Dublin, Ireland, on 26–28 April 2010.
  • Analysis: narrative synthesis of land classes (fallow, set-aside, abandoned, marginal, degraded, reclaimed, waste land), constraints, and utilisation options; no systematic meta-analysis or new field data are reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that high uncertainty remains because environmental, economic, and social constraints are not yet systematically taken into account and because potentials of novel crops and production methods are not fully exploited; it also notes that no scientific studies at present resolve the scientific challenges related to assessing future bioenergy potentials.
  • It states that no sound and internationally accredited methodology for including iLUC in bioenergy governance exists, and that recent iLUC model outputs were insufficient for informing detailed management decisions; there is also little empirical data to support the species-energy hypothesis and no agreement on the economic viability of bioenergy production on marginal land.
  • Evident from the text: this is a conceptual review rather than a systematic review or primary study, and its land-class scheme is acknowledged as having classes that are not on an equal hierarchical level and may intersect or resemble sub-classes of higher categories.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3897/biorisk.7.3036

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 132 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingcitation

    The quality of output of models recently developed to assess iLUC was found to be insufficient for informing detailed management decisions.

    “and the quality of the output of models recently developed to assess iLUC was found to be insufficient for informing detailed management decisions (Davis et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Davis et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    No sound and internationally accredited methodology for inclusion of iLUC issues in bioenergy governance exists so far.

    “So far no sound and internationally accredited methodology for inclusion of iLUC issues in bioenergy governance exist (Gawel and Ludwig 2011)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gawel and Ludwig 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Field data suggest that due to lower fertilizer requirements and higher N-use efficiency, perennial bioenergy crops emit 40% to >99% less N2O than conventional annual crops.

    “Field data suggest that due to lower fertilizer requirements and higher N-use efficiency, these crops emit 40% to >99% less N 2 O than conventional annual crops (Don et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Don et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    The 'payback period' associated with conversion of various native ecosystems to annual biofuel systems can last up to several centuries.

    “Fargione et al. (2008) show that the 'payback period' (i.e. the time before the C debt is fully compensated by avoided fossil fuel C use following biofuel production) associated with the conversion of various native ecosystems to annual biofuel systems can last up to several centuries.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fargione et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingcitation

    Costs of rehabilitation of degraded land by afforestation range from 100 € ha-1 (China) to about 3,500 € ha-1 (Austria) with additional costs of 4 to 40 € ha-1 yr-1.

    “For example, the costs of rehabilitation of degraded land by afforestation depends on the specific country and is in a range of 100 € ha -1 (China) to about 3,500 € ha -1 (Austria) with additional costs of 4 to 40 € ha -1 yr -1 (Metzger and Hüttermann 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Metzger and Hüttermann 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 50
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Deep roots and fast growth of perennial biomass crops result in high water uptake, and have been found to decrease effective rainfall by 50-60% compared with annual crops.

    “The deep roots and fast growth of perennial biomass crops result in high water uptake, and have been found to decrease effective rainfall by 50-60% compared with annual crops (Stephens et al. 2001).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stephens et al. 2001

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Reijnders and Huijbregts (2007) calculate that N2O emissions of 0.2-1.0t CO2 equiv.ha-1 yr-1, and soil carbon loss of 3.1 t CO2 equiv.ha-1 yr-1 for wheat and sugarbeet production equate to GHG emissions of 2.0-2.5 kg kg-1 ethanol and 0.6-0.9kg kg-1 ethanol, respectively.

    “Reijnders and Huijbregts (2007) calculate that N 2 O emissions of 0.2-1.0t CO 2 equiv.ha -1 yr -1 , and soil carbon loss of 3.1 t CO 2 equiv.ha -1 yr -1 for wheat and sugarbeet production equate to GHG emissions of 2.0-2.5 kg kg -1 ethanol and 0.6-0.9kg kg -1 ethanol, respectively, from the two crops.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reijnders and Huijbregts 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingcitation

    Low-yield energy crop production on marginal lands is clearly uneconomic.

    “Soldatos et al. (2011) found that low-yield energy crop production on marginal lands is clearly uneconomic.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Soldatos et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    While bioethanol production costs from feedstock grown in the Netherlands are uncompetitive with petrol, the cost of second generation ethanol production from Miscanthus grown on low grade agricultural land was calculated to be lower than the cost of ethanol production from sugarbeet grown on high grade agricultural land.

    “Meanwhile, whilst van der Hilst et al. (2010) found bioethanol production costs from feedstock grown in the Netherlands to be uncompetitive with petrol, the cost of second generation ethanol production from Miscanthus grown on low grade agricultural land was calculated to be lower than the cost of ethanol production from sugarbeet grown on high grade agricultural land.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van der Hilst et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Global Total Primary Energy Supply was about 509 EJ yr-1 in 2009.

    “In comparison, the Global Total Primary Energy Supply (i.e. the sum of all energy resources worldwide) was estimated to be about 509 EJ yr -1 in 2009 (IEA 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites IEA 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Ambiguity in the definition and characterization of surplus land and uncertainty in assessments of land availability and future bioenergy potentials is causing confusion about the prospects and environmental and socio-economic implications of bioenergy development on surplus land.

    “Ambiguity in the definition and characterization of surplus land as well as uncertainty in assessments of land availability and of future bioenergy potentials is causing confusion about the prospects and the environmental and socio-economic implications of bioenergy development in those areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Categorizing or quantifying marginal lands underlies great uncertainties and results in wide-ranging estimates of availability and suitability for bioenergy crops.

    “Therefore, categorizing or quantifying marginal lands underlies great uncertainties and results in wide-ranging estimates of availability and suitability for bioenergy crops (Dale et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dale et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The high level of uncertainty about bioenergy development on surplus land is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet taken into account and to the potentials offered by novel crops and their production methods not being fully exploited.

    “The high level of uncertainty is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet taken into account and to the potentials offered by those novel crops and their production methods not being fully exploited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    BMVBS (2010) calculated a global technical potential in 2020 of 15 EJ from agricultural land, 36 to 57 EJ from forestry and 30 EJ from residues like straw, excrements or organic waste.

    “A moderate estimation of bioenergy potential not explicitly considering degraded lands was given by BMVBS (2010), calculating a global technical potential in 2020 of 15 EJ from agricultural land, 36 to 57 EJ from forestry and 30 EJ from residues like straw, excrements or organic waste.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites BMVBS (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    There are no scientific studies at present that resolve the scientific challenges related to the assessment of future bioenergy potentials.

    “Haberl et al. (2010), in a critical review of modelling and calculation approaches, conclude that there are no scientific studies at present that resolve the scientific challenges related to the assessment of future bioenergy potentials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haberl et al. (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Waste land cannot be cultivated under conventional conditions and is usually not suitable for production of dedicated energy crops.

    “Due to the boundaries of cultivation as set by climate and soil, these areas cannot be cultivated under conventional conditions and, therefore, are usually not suitable for production of dedicated energy crops (Wiegmann et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wiegmann et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Low yields may increase the need for input of investment, labour and resources, affecting the energy balance such that the energy return on investment could easily become critical.

    “Low yields may further increase the need for input of investment, labour and resources, affecting the energy balance such that the energy return on investment (EROI) could easily become critical.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Energy crop production on marginal or degraded lands might enrich certain landscape values such as structural heterogeneity or aesthetics if planted not as landscape-wide monoculture but in smaller plots, but might still generate conflicts with biodiversity conservation.

    “Although energy crop production on marginal or degraded lands might enrich certain landscape values such as structural heterogeneity or aesthetics (Fernando 2005) if planted not as landscape-wide monoculture but in smaller plots, it might still generate conflicts with biodiversity conservation (Plieninger and Gaertner 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Fernando 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Plieninger and Gaertner 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Restricting the production of dedicated biomass crops to arable land in order to prevent conversion of permanent grassland could aggravate the food/energy conflict and stimulate increased indirect land-use change.

    “Restricting the production of dedicated biomass crops to arable land in order to prevent the conversion of permanent grassland could however aggravate the food/energy-conflict and stimulate increased iLUC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Marginal yields could entail a high land-take for energy crops to match existing or targeted demand for feedstock, which could result in conflicts with pastoralism and lands of high nature value as well as indirect land-use change.

    “Marginal yields could entail a high land-take for energy crops to match the existing or targeted demand for the respective feedstock.This again could result in conflicts for example with pastoralism and lands of high nature value as well as in indirect land-use change (iLUC; see Indirect land-use change).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Energy crops suitable for less productive soils can be used primarily for second generation biofuels, as far as refineries are an economically viable option in areas characterised by less productive soil.

    “Consequently, such crops can be used primarily for second generation biofuels, as far as refineries are an economically viable option in areas characterised by less productive soil.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Marginal lands often have poor and heterogeneous soils and are situated at transition zones between highly fertile crop land and vulnerable ecosystems, restricting possibilities for conventional agricultural management.

    “Marginal lands often have poor and heterogeneous soils and are situated at “transition zones” between highly fertile crop land and vulnerable ecosystems like protected natural sites, restricting the possibilities for conventional agricultural management.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Preventing the abandonment and intensification of High Nature Value farmland is a key action to halt the decline of biodiversity in Europe.

    “Preventing the abandonment and intensification of HNV farmland is beheld as a key action to halt the decline of biodiversity in Europe (EEA 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites EEA 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Despite recent findings that short-rotation coppice and perennial grass crops can potentially benefit farm-scale biodiversity, establishment of perennial biomass crops on land other than arable fields is still regarded as a threat rather than a benefit to biodiversity.

    “Despite recent findings that SRC and perennial grass crops can potentially benefit farm-scale biodiversity (Dauber et al. 2010;Rowe et al. 2011;Emmerson et al. 2011), establishment of perennial biomass crops on land other than arable fields is still regarded as a threat rather than a benefit to biodiversity (BfN 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Dauber et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Rowe et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Emmerson et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Lower yields may concentrate nutrients such as nitrogen, compromising use for combustion purposes due to higher NOx emissions.

    “Lower yields may also concentrate nutrients, such as nitrogen, compromising its use for combustion purposes, for example, due to higher NO x emissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Production of crops for bioenergy from marginal, degraded and abandoned lands is inadequately documented and only a small amount of data from demonstration or modelling projects is available.

    “Yet, the production of crops for bioenergy from those land classes is inadequately documented and only a small amount of data from demonstration or modelling projects is available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    On degraded land, two major constraints of biomass production are the large efforts and long time period required for reclamation of degraded land and the low productivity levels of these soils.

    “On degraded land, two major constraints of biomass production are the large efforts and long time period required for the reclamation of degraded land and the low productivity levels of these soils (Dornburg et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Dornburg et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    Energy crops suitable for less productive soils are typically optimized for maximum biomass and not for sugar or oil content.

    “Typically, energy crops suitable for less productive soils are optimized for maximum biomass and not for sugar or oil content.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Estimates of high yields of mixtures of native grassland perennials from agriculturally degraded lands in Northern America are questioned on the basis of potential nutrient losses from the system, high expenditures for weed control and an overestimation of availability of such degraded lands.

    “Estimates of high yields of mixtures of native grassland perennials from agriculturally degraded lands in Northern America are questioned on the basis of potential nutrient losses from the system, high expenditures for weed control and an overestimation of availability of such degraded lands (Russelle et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Russelle et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Degradation generally results in low yield potentials, low yield levels and low nutrient efficiency with risk of harvest loss.

    “Degradation generally results in low yield potentials, low yield levels and low nutrient efficiency with risk of harvest loss (Cofie and Penning de Vries 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Cofie and Penning de Vries 2002

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The quality of biomass from semi-natural grasslands depends on the meadow type, with different qualities required for biogas and combustion.

    “Nevertheless, the quality of the respective biomass depends on the meadow type, with different qualities required for biogas and combustion (Heinsoo et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heinsoo et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Biofuels in the EU must deliver current GHG savings of at least 35% compared with fossil fuels, rising to 50% in 2017 and 60% for new crops in 2018.

    “Biofuels must deliver current GHG savings of at least 35% compared with fossil fuels, rising to 50% in 2017 and to 60%, for biofuels from new crops, in 2018 (Europa 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Europa 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The finding that conservation grasslands with higher plant species numbers had lower biomass and ethanol yields could stimulate management of those grasslands towards low diversity systems, excluding species with undesirable fermentation characteristics.

    “This finding could stimulate the management of those grasslands towards low diversity systems, excluding species with undesirable fermentation characteristics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Growing energy crops predominately in marginal areas might cause long distance transport of feedstock if processing plants are centralised and distant, which could make net gains in energy and CO2-neutrality disappear.

    “This could induce relatively long distance transport of the bioenergy feedstock in cases where processing plants are centralised and distant from production areas.Long transport distances of bioenergy feedstock could make net gains in energy and CO 2 -neutrality disappear (Giller et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giller et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Increased bioenergy production can lead to price increases for all agricultural raw materials competing for scarce production factors, which could result in expansion of arable land into areas marginal for agricultural production under current conditions.

    “Furthermore, increased bioenergy production can lead to price increases for all agricultural raw materials competing for scarce production factors, which could result in an expansion of arable land into areas that are marginal for agricultural production under current conditions (Bringezu et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bringezu et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A negative socio-economic effect which may be associated with iLUC and a shift of agricultural production towards marginal lands is large-scale privatization of lands by most capitalized producers which may lead to displacement of smallholder farmers and whole rural communities.

    “A negative socio-economic effect which may be associated with iLUC and a shift of agricultural production towards marginal lands is a large-scale privatization of lands by the most capitalized producers which may lead to the displacement of smallholder farmers and whole rural communities (Howarth et al. 2009;Beringer et al. 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Howarth et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Beringer et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Zimbabwe, on lower grade lands with customary tenure, most land rights are held by traditional leaders, giving very limited land rights to farmers.

    “On those lower grade lands there is customary tenure, which gives very limited land rights to farmers; most of the land rights are held by traditional leaders.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jingura et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    N2O emissions stimulated by fertiliser application during cultivation offset displaced fossil energy GHG emissions.

    “Another argument against bioenergy is that emissions of the potent GHG N 2 O stimulated by fertiliser application during cultivation offset displaced fossil energy GHG emissions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Reijnders and Huijbregts 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Conservation grasslands in the USA with higher numbers of plant species had lower biomass yields and a lower ethanol yield per unit biomass compared with sites with fewer species.

    “However, contradictory results were documented by Adler et al. (2009) who showed that conservation grasslands in the USA with higher numbers of plant species had lower biomass yields and a lower ethanol yield per unit biomass compared with sites with fewer species.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Adler et al. (2009)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Lack of operational tools for full impact assessments is impeding fulfilment of agreed goal of sustainability in bioenergy development.

    “The lack of operational tools for full impact assessments is impeding the fulfilment of the agreed goal of sustainability in bioenergy development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Productive use of degraded lands will often require substantial investment in irrigation, which is a particular concern as irrigation for agriculture already accounts for over 70% of freshwater extraction globally.

    “Productive use of degraded lands will often require substantial investment in irrigation which is a particular concern, as irrigation for agriculture already accounts for over 70 % of freshwater extraction globally (Howarth et al. 2009;UNESCO 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Howarth et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites UNESCO 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Unchecked market-driven expansion of bioenergy production could culminate in industrial scale bioenergy chains involving thousands of hectares of cultivation centred on large processing and energy conversion plants, with negative environmental and socio-economic consequences.

    “Meanwhile, unchecked market-driven expansion of bioenergy production could culminate in industrial scale bioenergy chains involving thousands of hectares of cultivation centred on large processing and energy conversion plants, with negative environmental and socio-economic consequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In developed countries wages for bioenergy workers are equivalent to other technical qualified workers, whilst in developing countries workers are often paid below average wages.

    “Faaij and Domac (2006) distinguish between high-value employment and low value employment generated by bioenergy supply chains, noting that in developed countries wages for bioenergy workers are equivalent to other technical qualified workers, whilst in developing countries workers are often paid below average wages.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Faaij and Domac 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    High quality employment can only be financed through high economic viability of a production system.

    “Nevertheless, high quality employment can only be financed through high economic viability of a production system.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Small scale decentralised bioenergy cropping on land marginal for food production could be operated at a subsistence level to support local communities in developing countries, but would result in a modest gain in global energy resources only.

    “Meanwhile, from a social perspective, small scale decentralised bioenergy cropping on land marginal for food production could be operated at a subsistence level to support local communities in developing countries, as described in relation to the use of crop residues via small-scale gasification (Mendu et al. 2012).This would however result in a modest gain in global energy resources only.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mendu et al. 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In perennial cropping systems, the need for boosting actions may be lower because many processes providing essential services are operating naturally and most perennial systems probably can utilize ecological processes more efficiently than annual systems.

    “In perennial cropping systems, the need for boosting actions may be lower, because many of the processes providing these services are operating naturally and most perennial systems probably can utilize ecological processes more efficiently than annual systems (Jordan et al. 2007;Weih et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Jordan et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weih et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Pellets can be used in small scale local heating systems as well as in medium size commercial power plants, making pelleting adaptable to a wide size-range of bioenergy enterprises.

    “As pellets could be used in small scale local heating systems as well as in medium size commercial power plants, this type of biomass processing is adaptable to a wide size-range of bioenergy enterprises.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Perennial crops offer numerous environmental advantages and provide a wider range of ecosystem services compared with annual crops.

    “Perennial crops offer numerous environmental advantages, and provide a wider range of ecosystem services, compared with annual crops.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Börjesson 1999b

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Weih 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Smeets et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    For industrial-scale bioenergy cropping, lower margins might necessitate cheap labour, which in turn has consequences for social structure of local communities.

    “For industrial-scale bioenergy cropping in particular, this might necessitate cheap labour which in turn has consequences for the social structure of the local communities (Giller et al. 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Giller et al. 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is likely that perennial biomass crops may often be a better choice than annual crops to achieve reasonable biomass production along with maintaining high cropping security, enhancing energy and GHG balances and maximizing positive effects on biodiversity.

    “It is therefore likely that perennial biomass crops may often be a better choice than annual crops to achieve reasonable biomass production along with maintaining high cropping security, enhancing energy and GHG balances and maximizing the positive effects on biodiversity (but see Spangenberg and Settele 2009b).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Spangenberg and Settele 2009b

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    In that case, bioenergy production might mitigate or even reverse the constraining factors in the respective areas.

    “In that case, bioenergy production might mitigate or even reverse the constraining factors in the respective areas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    If constraints and their implications are assessed properly and accounted for, options for sustainable bioenergy production can be identified and developed.

    “In this section we demonstrate that, if the constraints and their implications are assessed properly and accounted for, options for sustainable bioenergy production can be identified and developed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unregulated land ownership, fragmented property, low level of education, institutional constraints, low level of marketing opportunities, competition for land or biomass and poor or lack of infrastructure can both hinder land rehabilitation and increase production costs.

    “Unregulated land ownership, fragmented property, low level of education, institutional constraints, low level of marketing opportunities, competition for land or biomass and poor or lack of infrastructure can both hinder land rehabilitation and increase production costs (Sugrue 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sugrue 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Bioenergy chains based on pelleting of perennial grasses can result in GHG reductions compared with fossil fuel chains when annual cropping or grassland is replaced and net GHG reductions when natural vegetation is considered as the reference land use.

    “in GHG reductions compared with fossil fuel chains when annual cropping or grassland is replaced and net GHG reductions when natural vegetation is considered as the reference land use.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smeets et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The high level of uncertainty is due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet systematically taken into account and due to not making the most out of the potentials and elbowroom offered by novel crops and their production methods.

    “The high level of uncertainty is on the one hand due to environmental, economic and social constraints not yet systematically taken into account and on the other hand due to not making the most out of the potentials and the elbowroom offered by novel crops and their production methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Relating socioeconomic factors to pressures is complicated by international trade and transboundary pressures.

    “However, relating socioeconomic factors to pressures is complicated by international trade and transboundary pressures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Germany alone, already being a net importer of agricultural land, would require a net additional land area of 2.5-3.4 Mha by 2030, mainly driven by current policy targets on biofuel.

    “They found that Germany alone, already being a net importer of agricultural land, would require a net additional land area of 2.5-3.4Mha by 2030, mainly driven by current policy targets on biofuel.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bringezu et al. (2009)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    A bottom-up approach can only be successful if there is sufficient demand, which may require top-down initiatives on the demand side of the bioenergy chain.

    “But, a bottom-up approach can only be successful if there is sufficient demand, which may require top-down initiatives on the demand side of the bioenergy chain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Three principal challenges to achieving yield improvement in biomass crops were identified by Karp and Shield (2008) to be a reduction in thermal threshold in order to extend the growing season, an increase in above ground biomass without depletion in below ground biomass and without causing water depletion.

    “Three principal challenges to achieving yield improvement in biomass crops were identified by Karp and Shield (2008) to be a reduction in thermal threshold in order to extend the growing season, an increase in above ground biomass without depletion in below ground biomass and without causing water depletion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Karp and Shield (2008)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Global scale data on land use, land property, climate and soil are often too coarse to provide reliable assessments that could be applied in local or regional land-use planning.

    “Global scale data on land use, land property, climate and soil are often too coarse to provide reliable assessments that could be applied in local or regional land-use planning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Harvesting biomass from brushlands is often beneficial for reducing fire hazards and herbicide usage and restoring wildlife habitats.

    “Such harvesting is often beneficial for reducing fire hazards and herbicide usage and restoring wildlife habitats (Anderson group 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Anderson group 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These erosion rates were less than one third of rates calculated for annual crops, but twice those calculated for grassland, and over ten times those calculated for deciduous forest.

    “These erosion rates were less than one third of the rates calculated for annual crops, but twice those calculated for grassland, and over ten times those calculated for deciduous forest.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smeets et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Local and regional bioenergy chains to generate heat, electricity and CHP would be more advantageous than globalised liquid biofuel chains.

    “Local and regional bioenergy chains to generate heat, electricity and CHP would be more advantageous than globalised liquid biofuel chains.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    For most areas of potential study, there is a net import or export of food and energy that requires macroeconomic assumptions to attribute impacts.

    “For most areas of potential study, there is a net import or export of food and energy that requires macroeconomic assumptions to attribute impacts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Estimates of availability and suitability of surplus land for development of energy crop production or use of existing biomass potentials are uncertain.

    “So far, estimates of availability and suitability of surplus land for development of energy crop production or use of existing biomass potentials are uncertain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Approaches have been developed to represent difficult to quantify impacts arising from cultivation of energy crops, such as biodiversity loss or GHG emissions, or integration of market models that quantify displacement and expansion effects, into consequential LCA models.

    “Approaches have been developed to represent difficult to quantify impacts arising from the cultivation of energy crops, such as biodiversity loss or GHG emissions (e.g.Fargione et al. 2010;Urban et al. 2011), or integration of market models that quantify displacement and expansion effects (Reinhard and Zah 2009;Reinhard and Zah 2011), into consequential LCA models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Fargione et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Urban et al. 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Reinhard and Zah 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Local socio-economic drivers are influenced by socio-economic drivers at regional and global scales that may also affect local biodiversity directly through pollution and GHG emissions.

    “In addition, local socio-economic drivers are influenced by socio-economic drivers at regional and global scales that may also affect local biodiversity directly through pollution and GHG emissions (Haberl et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Haberl et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Woody perennial biomass crops are likely to host diverse microbial communities including mycorrhizas, which can improve both biomass productivity and cropping security, and at the same time increase soil biodiversity.

    “For example, woody perennial biomass crops are likely to host diverse microbial communities including mycorrhizas, which can improve both biomass productivity and cropping security, and at the same time increase soil biodiversity (Rooney et al. 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rooney et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Switchgrass cultivation on non-degraded grassland has a neutral effect on soil C stocks and a positive effect on biodiversity (MSA) in Argentina, compared with a small negative effect on MSA when displacing natural vegetation.

    “Van Dam et al. (2009) report that switchgrass cultivation on non-degraded grassland has a neutral effect on soil C stocks and a positive effect on biodiversity, estimated by 'Mean Species Abundance' (MSA; see http://www.globio.info/what-is- globio/how-it-works/impact-on-biodiversity for definition), in Argentina, compared with a small negative effect on MSA when displacing natural vegetation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van Dam et al. 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    One barrier to development of more sustainable bioenergy chains based on low-input perennial biomass crops is the cost of establishment combined with a long payback period, which could be overcome by diverse forms of financial support.

    “One barrier to the development of more sustainable bioenergy chains based on low-input perennial biomass crops is the cost of establishment combined with a long payback period, which could be overcome by diverse forms of financial support (Sherrington et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sherrington et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reliability of data used in some LCAs is called into question.

    “Still more work is needed to further improve LCA, in particular as the reliability of data used in some LCAs is called into question (e.g.St. Clair et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites St. Clair et al. 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    There is a high potential for Miscanthus cultivation on grassland soils in relation to economic competitiveness and land availability in the Netherlands, but high uncertainty surrounding economic performance of pasture land.

    “Van der Hilst (2010) suggest that there is a high potential for Miscanthus cultivation on grassland soils, in relation to economic competitiveness and land availability in the Netherlands, but that there is high uncertainty surrounding the economic performance of pasture land.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Van der Hilst (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    A slowdown in introduction of biofuels, at least until adequate and effective controls addressing effects such as displacement are implemented in bioenergy policies, would reduce impact of dedicated energy crops on food commodity prices with detrimental effects upon the poor.

    “A slowdown in the introduction of biofuels, at least until adequate and effective controls addressing effects such as displacement are implemented in bioenergy policies, would reduce the impact of dedicated energy crops on for example food commodity prices with their detrimental effects upon the poor (RFA 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites RFA 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Rapid bioenergy development driven by indiscriminate incentives arising from a top-down approach can result in feedstock production that violates land rights and results in poor socio-economic and environmental performance.

    “Rapid bioenergy development driven by indiscriminate incentives arising from a top-down approach (e.g.political biofuels targets) can result in feedstock production that violates land rights and results in poor socio-economic and environmental performance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Encouraging smaller-scale bottom-up development of bioenergy chains can maximise socio-economic benefits, and could also help to achieve a more dispersed pattern of development.

    “Encouraging smaller-scale bottom-up development of bioenergy chains instead can maximise socio-economic benefits, and could also help to achieve a more dispersed pattern of development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most energy crops currently cultivated are largely undomesticated and at early stages of development, so plant breeding and identification of proper cultivars could significantly improve their productivity when grown under marginal conditions.

    “As most of the energy crops currently cultivated are largely undomesticated and at their early stages of development, plant breeding and identification of proper cultivars could significantly improve their productivity when grown under marginal conditions (Zegada-Lizarazu et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zegada-Lizarazu et al. 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

71 of 71
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Bioenergy developments will have a fundamental impact on the respective surplus lands.

    “The basic assumption of our discussion is that bioenergy developments will have a fundamental impact on the respective surplus lands, as reaching the bioenergy targets set by many countries would require landscape-scale changes of land use.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Reaching the bioenergy targets set by many countries would require landscape-scale changes of land use.

    “The basic assumption of our discussion is that bioenergy developments will have a fundamental impact on the respective surplus lands, as reaching the bioenergy targets set by many countries would require landscape-scale changes of land use.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Area limitation and harvest time variation reduce economic viability of energy forestry.

    “However, as both area limitation and harvest time variation reduce economic viability, careful ex ante planning is required.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Land may often be marginal for agricultural production because of environmental conditions which expose plants to abiotic stress from drought, flooding or extreme temperatures.

    “Land may often be marginal for agricultural production because of environmental conditions which expose plants to abiotic stress from drought, flooding or extreme temperatures.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Historically, breeding goals most often target short-term events to enhance productivity or fight potential pests, and build on high-input systems along with frequent application of chemicals for weed and pest control.

    “Historically, breeding goals most often target short-term events (e.g.single physiological processes) to enhance productivity or fight potential pests, and build on highinput systems along with the frequent application of chemicals for weed and pest control.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Local demand can be satisfied by the use of biomass in small boilers, in biomass-CHP plants and in anaerobic digestion-CHP plants.

    “Local demand can be satisfied by the use of biomass in small boilers, in biomass-CHP plants and in anaerobic digestion-CHP plants.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Transport distances informed by information or assumptions on the spatial distribution of cultivation, conversion and final use locations are an important component of LCA necessary to assess the sustainability of bioenergy cultivation in a certain area.

    “Transport distances informed by information or assumptions on the spatial distribution of cultivation, conversion and final use locations are an important component of LCA necessary to assess the sustainability of bioenergy cultivation in a certain area.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pelleting improves energy density.

    “Pelleting improves energy density, and pellets may be transported long distances if production and use are located relatively close (10s of kms) to water transport hubs (Faaij and Domac 2006).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Such site-specific choices are of particular importance for surplus land which is often characterised by environmental constraints for energy crop cultivation such as soil fertility, water availability, soil carbon stocks, erosion or location within natural sensitive areas.

    “Such site-specific choices are of particular importance for surplus land which is often characterised by environmental constraints for energy crop cultivation such as soil fertility, water availability, soil carbon stocks, erosion or location within natural sensitive areas.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Many processes that provide essential services in natural systems, such as organic nutrient cycling, pollination, predation, etc., need to be artificially boosted in cropping systems to achieve adequate yield in cropping.

    “Many processes that provide essential services in natural systems, such as organic nutrient cycling, pollination, predation, etc., need to be artificially boosted in cropping systems to achieve adequate yield in cropping.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The boosting actions, mostly the use of herbicides and pesticides, frequently result in negative impact on biodiversity.

    “The boosting actions, mostly the use of herbicides and pesticides, frequently result in negative impact on biodiversity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Plant breeding is also of vital importance for the environmental benefits they have and for improving the yields they deliver.

    “In addition to improving crop performance by choosing the most appropriate crop types for the respective characteristics of surplus land, plant breeding is also of vital importance for the environmental benefits they have and for improving the yields they deliver.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Bioenergy production is to a large extent driven by environmental goals.

    “Bioenergy production is to a large extent driven by environmental goals and, as a consequence, bioenergy plans need to be optimised from an environmental perspective.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most land could be considered as 'available' for bioenergy production as long as the caveats elaborated earlier are sufficiently taken into account.

    “As such, most land could be considered as 'available' for bioenergy production as long as the caveats elaborated earlier are sufficiently taken into account, the choice then being how to best use the land for bioenergy production.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Harvesting of the existing vegetation would allow the land to remain in communal ownership while providing an 'alternative' source of income for the community.

    “Harvesting of the existing vegetation would allow the land to remain in communal ownership while providing an 'alternative' source of income for the community.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In some instances, a positive environmental effect may be achieved by using the vegetation already growing on the land for bioenergy rather than using the land for the cultivation of energy crops.

    “In some instances, a positive environmental effect may be achieved by using the vegetation already growing on the land for bioenergy rather than using the land for the cultivation of energy crops.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Use of grassland biomass already growing on CRP land, instead of converting the land to perennial grassy crops, might further minimize environmental degradation while improving the productivity of the land.

    “The use of grassland biomass already growing on CRP land, instead of converting the land to perennial grassy crops, might further minimize environmental degradation while improving the productivity of the land.”
17 of 17

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the last 30 years the term marginal land is frequently used interchangeably with other terms such as unproductive lands, waste lands, underutilized lands, idle lands, abandoned lands, or degraded lands.

    “In the last 30 years the term “marginal land” is frequently used interchangeably with other terms such as “unproductive lands,” “waste lands,” “underutilized lands,” “idle lands,” “abandoned lands,” or “degraded lands” (Dauber et al., 2012;FAO, 1976;Lal, 1991;Tógyer, 2012;Wiegmann et al., 2008)”

    From Concepts of agricultural marginal lands and their utilisation: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Dauber et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Heinsoo citation year differs from reference

    Minor

    The text cites Heinsoo et al. as a 2009 publication, but the listed reference on Estonian semi-natural grasslands is dated 2010.

  • Soldatos citation year differs from reference

    Minor

    The text cites Soldatos et al. as a 2011 publication, but the corresponding reference is dated 2010.

  • DeHaan citation year differs from reference

    Minor

    The text cites DeHaan et al. as a 2009 publication, but the corresponding reference is dated 2010.

3 of 3

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 157 · Cited by 206

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Beaufoy G (2011) HNV farming policy -progress to-date and future challenges. In: Ó hUal- lacháin D, Finn J (Eds) Conserving farmland biodiversity, Lessons learned & future prospects. Teagasc Biodiversity Conference, Wexford (Ireland), May 2011. Teagasc (Carlow), 10-14.
  2. Britt C, Garstang J (Eds) (2002) Bioenergy crops and bioremediation -a review. Report by ADAS for the Department for Food, Environment and Rural Affairs: 1-134.
  3. Emmerson M, Bourke D, Dauber J, O'Rourke E, Stanley D, Thompson R, Whelan P, Stout J (2011) The food versus fuel debate -what effect will replacing traditional crops with Miscanthus x giganteus have on farmland biodiversity? In: Ó hUallacháin D, Finn J (Eds) Conserving farmland biodiversity, Lessons learned & future prospects. Teagasc Biodiversity Conference, Wexford (Ireland), May 2011. Teagasc (Carlow), 58-59.
  4. Europa: Commission sets up system for certifying sustainable biofuels. Press release 10 June 2010. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/711&format=HT ML&aged=0&language=en&guiLanguage=en European Union (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the council on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Official Journal of the Eu- ropean Union L 140/16: 1-47.
  5. Fernando ALAC (2005) Fitorremediação por Miscanthus x giganteus de solos contaminados com metais pesados, PHD Thesis Universidade Nova de Lisboa (Lisbon).
  6. NCB (2011) Biofuels: Ethical issues. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (UK). http://www.nuf- fieldbioethics.org/chapter-downloads
  7. RFA (2008) The Gallagher Review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. Renewable Fuels Agency (St Leonards-on-Sea): 1-92. http://www.bioenergy.org.nz/documents/liq- uidbiofuels/Report_of_the_Gallagher_review.pdf
  8. Schroers JO (2006) Zur Entwicklung der Landnutzung auf Grenzstandorten in Abhängigkeit agrarmarktpolitischer, agrarstrukturpolitischer und produktions-technologischer Rahmen- bedingungen. PhD Thesis, University of Giessen (Giessen). http://geb.uni-giessen.de/geb/ volltexte/2007/4511/
  9. Sugrue A (2008) Bioenergy production on marginal and degraded land: the potential social impacts. Draft paper for presentation to the joint international workshop on high nature value criteria and potential for sustainable use of degraded land. Paris (France) June and July 2008: 1-8. http://www.unep.fr/energy/activities/mapping/pdf/social.pdf
  10. Weih M (2009) Willow short rotation coppice commercially grown on agricultural land in Sweden -possibilities for improvement of biodiversity and landscape design. IEA Technical Review No. 4: 1-36. http://www.shortrotationcrops.org
  11. Wicke B (2011) Bioenergy production on degraded and marginal land -Assessing its poten- tials, economic performance, and environmental impacts for different settings and geo- graphical scales. PhD Thesis. Utrecht University (Utrecht). http://nws.chem.uu.nl/publi- ca/Publicaties%202011/Proefschrift_Wicke.pdf
  12. Wiegmann K, Hennenberg KJ, Fritsche UR (2008) Degraded Land and Sustainable Bioenergy Feedstock Production. Issue Paper of the Joint International Workshop on High Nature Value Criteria and Potential for Sustainable Use of Degraded Lands, Paris. Oeko-Institut (Darmstadt): 1-10.
  13. Yan LZ, Zhang L, Wang SQ, Hu L (2008) Potential yield of bioethanol from energy crops and their regional distribution in China. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 24: 213-216.

Authors
Dauber, J., Brown, C., Fernando, A. L., Finnan, J., Krasuska, E., Ponitka, J., Styles, D., Thrän, D., Van Groenigen, K. J., Weih, M., & Zah, R.
Affiliations
  • Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE)
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DE)
  • Bangor University (GB)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
  • Northern Arizona University (US)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Dauber, Jens
Venue
BioRisk
Published
2012-10-17
Volume
7
Pages
5-50
ISSN
  • 1313-2644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1313-2652
OpenAlex
W2165407048
Cited by
206
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 2
FWCI
33.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BIORISK – Biodiversity and Ecosystem Risk Assessment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ZooKeys (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • OpenAgrar (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • European Science Foundation
  • European Social Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
bioenergy, surplus land, land use conflicts, dedicated energy crops, food versus fuel, land availability, sustainable bioenergy, socio-economic impacts, environmental impact, bioenergy policy, energy security, climate change mitigation, biodiversity and ecosystem services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review