Cited by 76Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchDelphi Technique in ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Content and Criterion Validity of the Preliminary Core Dataset for Clinical Trials in Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Open access
CHOY, ERNEST H., ARNOLD, LESLEY M., CLAUW, DANIEL J., CROFFORD, LESLIE J., GLASS, JENNIFER M., SIMON, LEE S., MARTIN, SUSAN A., STRAND, C. VIBEKE +2 more·2009·The Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective.: Increasing research interest and emerging new therapies for treatment of fibromyalgia (FM) have led to a need to develop a consensus on a core set of outcome measures that should be assessed and reported in all clinical trials, to facilitate interpretation of the data and understanding of the disease. This aligns with the key objective of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) initiative to improve outcome measurement through a data driven, interactive consensus process. Methods.: Through patient focus groups and Delphi processes, working groups at previous OMERACT meetings identified potential domains to be included in the core data set. A systematic review has shown that instruments measuring these domains are available and are at least moderately sensitive to change. Most instruments have been validated in multiple languages. This pooled analysis study aims to develop the core data set by analyzing data from 10 randomized controlled trials (RCT) in FM. Results.: Results from this study provide support for the inclusion of the following in the core data set: pain, tenderness, fatigue, sleep, patient global assessment, and multidimensional function/health related quality of life. Construct validity was demonstrated with outcome instruments showing convergent and divergent validity. Content and criterion validity were confirmed by multivariate analysis showing R square values between 0.4 and 0.6. Low R square value is associated with studies in which one or more domains were not assessed. Conclusion.: The core data set was supported by high consensus among attendees at OMERACT 9. Establishing an international standard for RCT in FM should facilitate future metaanalyses and indirect comparisons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3899/jrheum.090368

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fatigue, cognitive symptoms, and the extent of somatic symptoms became increasingly known and appreciated as key fibromyalgia features.

    “the importance of symptoms that had not been considered by the ACR Multicenter Criteria Committee became increasingly known and appreciated as key fibromyalgia features: for example, fatigue, cognitive symptoms, and the extent of somatic symptoms (4 -7).”

    From The American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia and Measurement of Symptom Severity (2010) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) lists fatigue and dyscognition (cognitive dysfunction) among the relevant fibromyalgia domains identified through earlier patient and clinician exercises. It does not identify the extent of somatic symptoms as a domain or establish the claimed progression in recognition of all three features. The Discussion (page unavailable) also says clinical-trial data were insufficient to require dyscognition in the core dataset. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [13]Gendreau M Williams DA Strand V Validation and minimum clinically important differences in SF-36 in randomized controlled trials of fibromyalgia 2008 In press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CHOY, E. H., ARNOLD, L. M., CLAUW, D. J., CROFFORD, L. J., GLASS, J. M., SIMON, L. S., MARTIN, S. A., STRAND, C. V., WILLIAMS, D. A., & MEASE, P. J.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • RTI Health Solutions (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
The Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2009-10
Volume
36
Issue
10
Pages
2330-2334
ISSN
  • 0315-162X (ISSN-L)
  • 1499-2752
OpenAlex
W1984390535
Cited by
76
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pfizer
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  • Versus Arthritis
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (U01AR55069, U01AR055069, R01AR053207)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, core outcome set, clinical trial outcome measures, content validity, criterion validity, construct validity, OMERACT, pain, tenderness, fatigue, sleep, patient global assessment, health-related quality of life, Delphi consensus, patient focus groups
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Delphi Technique, Fatigue, Fibromyalgia, Humans, International Cooperation, Pain, Syndrome, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review