Cited by 20Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatment

Assessment of Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome

Mease, Phillip J.·2008·Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this review is to describe the current state of consensus on the key clinical domains which constitute fibromyalgia syndrome [FMS], from both the clinician and patient perspective, and the outcome measures being used or in development to assess these domains in clinical research.Results: In a series of Delphi exercises and patient focus groups, both clinicians and patients concurred that key domains which constitute the experience of FMS and should be assessed in clinical research include pain, fatigue, sleep disturbance, multidimensional function, health-related quality of life, mood disturbance, and problems with cognition. In addition, clinicians are concerned about assessing treatment side effects and patients feel that stiffness should be assessed. Most of these domains, save dyscognition and stiffness, are currently being assessed with a variety of outcome measures in clinical trials. The performance quality of these instruments is reviewed. Areas in which further research and development is needed and, to a certain extent, underway to improve the assessment of these domains is described. Other areas of methodologic research include the establishment of “minimal clinically important difference” thresholds for outcome measures and the development of a composite responder index for FMS.Conclusions: The field of outcome assessment of FMS is maturing rapidly, both as a result of increased awareness of the importance of the clinical problem as well as the emergence of new effective therapies. Developments in this field are reviewed, including the determination and prioritization of key domains that constitute the syndrome and the performance characteristics of outcome measures for those domains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10582450801960347

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mease, P. J.
Venue
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain
Published
2008-01
Volume
16
Issue
1-2
Pages
75-83
ISSN
  • 1058-2452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-7012
OpenAlex
W2017565051
Cited by
20
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
Keywords
fibromyalgia, outcome measures, pain, fatigue, sleep disorders, health-related quality of life, mood disturbance, cognitive impairment, joint stiffness, treatment side effects, minimal clinically important difference, Delphi consensus, patient perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review