Cited by 7Nerve injury and regenerationElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical ApplicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

Evaluation of the effectiveness of biodegradable electrospun caprolactoneand poly(lactic acid-ε-caprolactone) nerve conduits for peripheral nerveregenerations in a rat sciatic nerve defect model

Open access
DADACI, Mehmet, KARAGÜLLE, Nimet, SÖNMEZ, Erhan, DADACI, Zeynep, İŞCİ, Evren Tevfik, İNCE, Bilsev, VARGEL, İbrahim, PİŞKİN, Erhan +1 more·2016·TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this study was to compare electrospun caprolactone (EC) and poly(lactic acid-ε-caprolactone) (PLCL) nerve conduits with nerve graft in a rat sciatic nerve defect model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 male Wistar albino rats were divided into 4 groups, with 8 rats in each group. A nerve defect of 1 cm was constructed in the left sciatic nerve of the rats. These defects were left denuded in the sham group, and reconstructed with nerve grafts, PLCL, and EC nerve conduits in the other groups. After 3 months, nerve regenerations were evaluated macroscopically, microscopically, and electrophysiologically. The numbers of myelinated axons in the cross-sections of the nerves were compared between the groups. RESULTS: Macroscopically, all nerve coaptations were intact and biodegradation was detected in nerve conduits. Electromyographic assessment and count of myelinated axons in the cross-sections of the nerves displayed the best regeneration in the nerve graft group (P < 0.001) and similar results were obtained in the PLCL and EC nerve conduit groups (P = 0.79). Light and electron microscopy studies demonstrated nerve regeneration in both nerve conduit groups. CONCLUSION: EC nerve conduits and PLCL nerve conduits yielded similar results and may be alternatives to nerve grafts as they biodegrade.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3906/sag-1412-110

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In neural tissue engineering, PLCL combined with neurotrophic factors can significantly improve nerve cell adhesion and axonal extension and promote neural tissue repair.

    “For example, in neural tissue engineering, when PLCL is combined with neurotrophic factors, it can significantly improve nerve cell adhesion and axonal extension, and promote the repair of neural tissue [28].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DADACI, M., KARAGÜLLE, N., SÖNMEZ, E., DADACI, Z., İŞCİ, E. T., İNCE, B., VARGEL, İ., PİŞKİN, E., & ERK, A. Y.
Affiliations
  • Mersin Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
  • Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
Venue
TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Published
2016
Volume
46
Issue
2
Pages
539-548
ISSN
  • 1300-0144 (ISSN-L)
  • 1303-6165
OpenAlex
W2334781871
Cited by
7
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hacettepe University Institutional Repository (hacettepe.edu.tr) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
nerve conduits, electrospun scaffolds, ε-caprolactone, peripheral nerve regeneration, sciatic nerve defect, nerve grafts, biodegradable biomaterials, myelinated axons, nerve coaptation, rat model
MeSH terms
Animals, Male, Nerve Regeneration, Polyesters, Sciatic Nerve, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review