Astroturfs et ONG de consommateurs téléguidées à Bruxelles. Quand le business se crée une légitimité « par en bas »
Open accessAbstract
Astroturf is a process by which firms generate mobilizations. Though taking the form of NGOs comprised of “ordinary” citizens, they are nevertheless paid for by private funds and in the service of commercial ends. Often sponsored by multinational firms or employer federations with logistical assistance from public relations agencies, these NGOs seek to pass off industry positions as disinterested or consumer-driven speech in the public sphere. An increasing number of specialized firms now offer to launch a “consumers’ movement” (including defensive scenarios in the event of discovery) as part of their standard services. In examining the social dynamics and constraints that determine recourse to this type of service among multinational firms, I draw upon several extant studies of the subject as well as an ethnographic case study. ■
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Astroturfing appears in various sectors and aims to manipulate public opinion or influence government decisions and public policy.
“Appearing in various sectors (Boulay, 2012), this strategy aims to manipulate public opinion (Arce-García et al., 2022;Boman & Schneider, 2021;García-Orosa, 2021;Henrie & Gilde, 2019;Mendelová, 2016;Seto, 2019) or influence government decisions (Laurens, 2015;Wear, 2014) and public policy (Al-Rawi & Rahman, 2020).”
From Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery (2026) · cites this paper as Laurens, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond Verification| Inauthentic Authenticity: Astroturfing to Generate True Affect Using Fakery
Alloing, C., Fournier, V., Reid, V., Germain, S., Turbide, O., & Yates, S. (2026) · International Journal of Communication · doi:10.65476/qd17zh66
- Authors
- Laurens, S.
- Affiliations
- Centre Georg Simmel (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Laurens, Sylvain
- ORCID
- Laurens, Sylvain
- Venue
- Critique internationale
- Publisher
- CAIRN
- Published
- 2015-05-27
- Volume
- N° 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 83-99
- ISSN
- 1290-7839 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1923610492
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Critique internationale (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- Critique internationale
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
- Keywords
- astroturfing, corporate legitimacy, consumer movement, multinational corporations, public relations, corporate social responsibility, Brussels
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review