The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Artificial Intelligence Serving Decision-Making in Marketing
Open accessAbstract
• Objectives / Research QuestionsCustomer participation is a central concern for many distributors, who must support customers to enable them to play their role in the production of the service. Support is considered as a combination of a content (affective, cognitive or instrumental) and a means that provides it (personal or physical support). The aim of the study is to examine how the presence or absence of combinations of support contribute to in-store customer satisfaction. • MethodologyThe methodology is based on the analysis of 3,920 spontaneous customer reviews, collected after an in-store experience. These comments mentioned the presence, absence or failure of assistance. These verbatim comments were then coded according to the content and means of the support mentioned, and analysed using the Tetraclass method. • ResultsThis research proposes three main contributions. Firstly, it provides a better definition of the concept of participation support and the elements that characterise it (means and content). Secondly, it proposes to use the Tetraclass model and its methodology on a new type of data: customer reviews. Finally, it shows that combinations of support do contribute to satisfaction in different ways, with some having a strong impact on overall satisfaction, others impacting on dissatisfaction, and still others affect both evaluations. • Managerial implicationsThe results are particularly interesting for managers, who can thus identify the effect of combinations of support on customer satisfaction and dissatisfaction. This gives them levers for creating value associated with this support. They also have a methodology for exploiting customer reviews. • OriginalityThis research focuses on participation support. Despite the growing importance of the concept of participation, this subject remains little explored and many articles indicate it as an avenue for further research. In addition, the methodology is somewhat original in that it is based on spontaneous customer opinions and adopts the Tetraclass model to analyse the different logics of contribution to satisfaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media
Cloarec, J., Meyer‐Waarden, L., & Munzel, A. (2024) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21998 · Cited by 104
“The academic discourse has encapsulated this tension within the concept of the personalization ‐ privacy paradox, highlighting the conflicted consumer behavior of desiring customized interactions whilst guarding personal data (Awad & Krishnan, 2006; Cloarec et al., 2024).”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cloarec, J., Macé, S., & Pauwels, K.
- Affiliations
- Centre de Recherche Magellan (FR)
- ESCP Business School (FR)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- Décisions Marketing
- Publisher
- CAIRN.INFO
- Published
- 2024-01-25
- Volume
- N° 112
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 155-156
- ISSN
- 0779-7389 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4391579955
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- green
- shs.cairn.info
- Locations
- Décisions Marketing (publishedVersion)
- Cairn.info (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence, marketing decision-making, marketing analytics, data-driven marketing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review