The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pour une théorie de l'appropriation des outils de gestion : vers un dépassement de l'opposition conception-usage
Open accessAbstract
Résumé Souhaitant rompre avec une dichotomie conception-usage encore largement présente dans l’étude des outils de gestion, l’article reprend des cadres théoriques récents des sciences de gestion en les intégrant dans une "perspective appropriative". La première partie développe l’objet et la problématique de l’appropriation des outils de gestion, ainsi que différents regards possibles sur le phénomène. La seconde partie avance deux grandes théories de l’appropriation (la théorie de la conception à l’usage et la théorie de la mise en acte) qui permettent de répondre de façon cohérente à la problématique, en reprenant les objets et les regards mobilisés dans la partie précédente. La réflexion s’achève par une ouverture sur l’évolution et le pilotage des outils de gestion dans une perspective appropriative.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis
Giddens, A. (1979) · Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · Cited by 7,939
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.2.121 · Cited by 3,879
Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach
Archer, M. S. (1995) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511557675 · Cited by 3,125
Realist social theory the morphogenetic approach
Archer, M. S. (1995) · Cited by 2,938
Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique
Bourdieu, P. (1972) · Librairie Droz eBooks · doi:10.3917/droz.bourd.1972.01 · Cited by 2,048
Realist social theory: List of figures
Archer, M. S. (1995) · Cited by 1,672
Les régulations dans les organisations: Régulation de contrôle et régulation autonome
Reynaud, J.-D. (1988) · Revue Française de Sociologie · doi:10.2307/3321884 · Cited by 531
Corporate Intranet Implementation: Managing Emergent Technologies and Organizational Practices
Technical University of Denmark, Bansler, J., Damsgaard, J., Aalborg University, Scheepers, R., Swinburne University of Technology, Havn, E., Technical University of Denmark, Thommesen, J., & Technical University of Denmark (2000) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00010 · Cited by 523
13. Instrument, activité et développement du pouvoir d'agir
Rabardel, P. (2005) · Entre connaissance et organisation : l'activité collective · doi:10.3917/dec.lorin.2005.01.0251 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- De Vaujany, F. X.
- Venue
- Management & Avenir
- Publisher
- CAIRN
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- n° 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 109-126
- ISSN
- 1768-5958 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991825635
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- fr
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pour une théorie de l'appropriation des outils de gestion : vers un dépassement de l'opposition conception-usage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3917/mav.009.0109
- The paper
- De Vaujany, F. X. (2006). Pour une théorie de l'appropriation des outils de gestion : vers un dépassement de l'opposition conception-usage. Management & Avenir. https://doi.org/10.3917/mav.009.0109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
