Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory
Abstract
The past decade has brought advanced information technologies, which include electronic messaging systems, executive information systems, collaborative systems, group decision support systems, and other technologies that use sophisticated information management to enable multiparty participation in organization activities. Developers and users of these systems hold high hopes for their potential to change organizations for the better, but actual changes often do not occur, or occur inconsistently. We propose adaptive structuration theory (AST) as a viable approach for studying the role of advanced information technologies in organization change. AST examines the change process from two vantage points: (1) the types of structures that are provided by advanced technologies, and (2) the structures that actually emerge in human action as people interact with these technologies. To illustrate the principles of AST, we consider the small group meeting and the use of a group decision support system (GDSS). A GDSS is an interesting technology for study because it can be structured in a myriad of ways, and social interaction unfolds as the GDSS is used. Both the structure of the technology and the emergent structure of social action can be studied. We begin by positioning AST among competing theoretical perspectives of technology and change. Next, we describe the theoretical roots and scope of the theory as it is applied to GDSS use and state the essential assumptions, concepts, and propositions of AST. We outline an analytic strategy for applying AST principles and provide an illustration of how our analytic approach can shed light on the impacts of advanced technologies on organizations. A major strength of AST is that it expounds the nature of social structures within advanced information technologies and the key interaction processes that figure in their use. By capturing these processes and tracing their impacts, we can reveal the complexity of technology-organization relationships. We can attain a better understanding of how to implement technologies, and we may also be able to develop improved designs or educational programs that promote productive adaptations.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Adaptive structuration theory suggests that many organizational phenomena including organizational leadership transform when interacting with Advanced Information Technologies.
“In this context, the adaptive structuration theory (DeSanctis and Poole, 1994) suggests that many organizational phenomena including organizational leadership transform when interacting with Advanced Information Technologies (AITs).”
From E-Leadership and Teleworking in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: What We Know and Where Do We Go (2020) · cites this paper as DeSanctis and Poole, 1994
Cites
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
MIS problems and failures: A socio- technical perspective
Bostrom, R. P., & Heinen, J. S. (1977) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/248710 · Cited by 1,329 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760 · see citing works
Texas A&M International University, Kock, N., Lynn, G., & Stevens Institute of Technology (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00302 · Cited by 3,783 · see citing works
The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration
Cramton, C. D. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.3.346.10098 · Cited by 1,916 · see citing works
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889 · see citing works
Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity1
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148857 · Cited by 1,511 · see citing works
10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization
Orlikowski, W. J., & Scott, S. V. (2008) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520802211644 · Cited by 2,571 · see citing works
Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams
Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Bentley University, U., Markus, M. L., Silver, M., & Fordham University (2008) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00176 · Cited by 927 · see citing works
Understanding User Responses to Information Technology: A Coping Model of User Adaptation1
Beaudry, A., & Pinsonneault, A. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148693 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Designing Virtual Customer Environments for New Product Development: Toward a Theory
Nambisan, S. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2002.7389914 · Cited by 1,026 · see citing works
The role of leadership in a digitalized world: a review
Cortellazzo, L., Bruni, E., & Zampieri, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01938 · Cited by 808 · see citing works
Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology
Siegen, U., Pipek, V., Wulf, V., & Siegen, F.-I. F. A. I. F. A. U. (2009) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00195 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
E-leadership: Re-examining transformations in leadership source and transmission
Avolio, B. J., Sosik, J. J., Kahai, S. S., & Baker, B. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.003 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research
Brown, S. A., Dennis, A. R., & Venkatesh, V. (2010) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222270201 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Sarker, S., Chatterjee, S., Xiao, X., & Elbanna, A. (2019) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2019/13747 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
GREENHALGH, T., POTTS, H. W. W., WONG, G., BARK, P., & SWINGLEHURST, D. (2009) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x · Cited by 541 · see citing works
E-Leadership and Teleworking in Times of COVID-19 and Beyond: What We Know and Where Do We Go
Contreras, F., Baykal, E., & Abid, G. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.590271 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
“In this context, the adaptive structuration theory (DeSanctis and Poole, 1994) suggests that many organizational phenomena including organizational leadership transform when interacting with Advanced Information Technologies (AITs).”
BackgroundSykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Gosain, S. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650296 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Humans and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations
Murray, A., Rhymer, J., & Sirmon, D. G. (2021) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2019.0186 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations
DeSanctis, G., & Monge, P. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.6.693 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
Self-citationLeonardi, P. M. (2013) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2013/37.3.04 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Schryen, G. (2013) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.45 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Virtual Work: Bridging Research Clusters
Raghuram, S., Hill, N. S., Gibbs, J. L., & Maruping, L. M. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0020 · Cited by 426 · see citing works
Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: A task-technology fit perspective.
Maruping, L. M., & Agarwal, R. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.975 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Theorising big IT programmes in healthcare: Strong structuration theory meets actor-network theory
Greenhalgh, T., & Stones, R. (2010) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.034 · Cited by 371 · see citing works
Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., & John, R. (2005) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1050.0044 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
One click, many meanings: interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media
Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2015.1127248 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: A virtue ethics approach to people analytics
Gal, U., Jensen, T. B., & Stein, M.-K. (2020) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2020.100301 · Cited by 342 · see citing works
Ba, S., Stallaert, J., & Whinston, A. B. (2001) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.12.3.225.9712 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Why Do Evaluations of eHealth Programs Fail? An Alternative Set of Guiding Principles
Greenhalgh, T., & Russell, J. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000360 · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Defining E‐leadership as Competence in ICT‐Mediated Communications: An Exploratory Assessment
Roman, A. V., Van Wart, M., Wang, X., Liu, C., Kim, S., & McCarthy, A. (2019) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.12980 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Luna-Reyes, L. F., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2014) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.08.001 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Something(s) old and something(s) new: Modeling drivers of global virtual team effectiveness
Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Rapp, T. L., & Gilson, L. L. (2012) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.1772 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Digital Leadership: A Bibliometric Analysis
Tigre, F. B., Curado, C., & Henriques, P. L. (2023) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/15480518221123132 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Capturing the Complexity of Malleable IT Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory for Individuals1
Schmitz, K. W., Teng, J. T. C., & Webb, K. J. (2016) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2016/40.3.07 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
An analysis of communication mode in group support systems research
Fjermestad, J. (2004) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/s0167-9236(03)00021-6 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
O’Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.4.13 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Beyond the organizational ‘container’: Conceptualizing 21st century sociotechnical work
Winter, S., Berente, N., Howison, J., & Butler, B. (2014) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.10.003 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
An investigation of the use of global, virtual, and colocated new product development teams
McDonough, E. F., Kahnb, K. B., & Barczaka, G. (2001) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1820110 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
The daily stand-up meeting: A grounded theory study
Stray, V., Sjøberg, D. I. K., & Dybå, T. (2016) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2016.01.004 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Casting the Net: A Multimodal Network Perspective on User–System Interactions
Kane, G. C., & Alavi, M. (2008) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0158 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Can You Hear Me Now? Communication in Virtual Product Development Teams<sup>*</sup>
Montoya, M. M., Massey, A. P., Hung, Y. C., & Crisp, C. B. (2009) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2009.00342.x · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Davidson, E., & Chiasson, M. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000518 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Charlier, S. D., Stewart, G. L., Greco, L. M., & Reeves, C. J. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.05.002 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Lippert, S. K., & Davis, M. (2006) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551506066042 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Emotional support during times of stress: can text messaging compete with in-person interactions?
Holtzman, S., DeClerck, D., Turcotte, K., Lisi, D., & Woodworth, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.043 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2022) · Computing Handbook · doi:10.1201/9780429171529-98 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. (2014) · Computing Handbook, Third Edition · doi:10.1201/b16768-7 · Cited by 103
Seidel, S., & Urquhart, C. (2013) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1057/jit.2013.17 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Nanyang Technological University, Chandra, S., Srivastava, S., HEC School of Management, P., Theng, Y.-L., & Nanyang Technological University (2012) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1jais.00310 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Mobile technologies in mobile spaces: Findings from the context of train travel
Axtell, C., Hislop, D., & Whittaker, S. (2008) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.07.001 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Research on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (1997) · Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50125-4 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Gravitating towards Facebook (GoToFB): What it is? and How can it be measured?
Aladwani, A. M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.005 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Liu, C., Van Wart, M., Kim, S., Wang, X., McCarthy, A., & Ready, D. (2020) · Australian Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12433 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Kleine, A.-K., Kokje, E., Lermer, E., & Gaube, S. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/46859 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Designing for Appropriation: A Theoretical Account
Tchounikine, P. (2017) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2016.1203263 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., & Zornoza, A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12449 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Waterson, P., Glenn, Y., & Eason, K. (2012) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2011.10.011 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
O'Leary, M. B., Wilson, J. M., & Metiu, A. (2013) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2322710 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 121-147
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2169736278
- Cited by
- 3,879
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 112 · 2025: 137 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 138 · 2019: 136 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 116 · 2016: 142 · 2015: 175 · 2014: 176 · 2013: 193 · 2012: 206
- FWCI
- 105.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Keywords
- adaptive structuration theory, advanced information technology, organizational change, group decision support systems, social structure, technology-organization relationship, small group meetings, technology implementation, technology design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review