Cited by 112Microbial Metabolites in Food BiotechnologyGut microbiota and healthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High purity galacto-oligosaccharides enhance specific Bifidobacterium species and their metabolic activity in the mouse gut microbiome

Open access
Monteagudo-Mera, A., Arthur, J.C., Jobin, C., Keku, T., Bruno-Barcena, J.M., Azcarate-Peril, M.A.·2016·Beneficial Microbes

Abstract

Prebiotics are selectively fermented ingredients that result in specific changes in the composition and/or activity of the gastrointestinal microbiota, thus conferring benefit(s) upon the host health. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of a β(1-4)galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) formulation consisting of 90% pure GOS (GOS90), on the composition and activity of the mouse gut microbiota. Germ-free mice were colonised with microbiota from four pathogen-free wt 129 mice donors (SPF), and stools were collected during a feeding trial in which GOS90 was delivered orally for 14 days. Pyrosequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons showed that Bifidobacterium and specific Lactobacillus , Bacteroides and Clostridiales were more prevalent in GOS90-fed mice after 14 days, although the prebiotic impact on Bifidobacterium varied among individual mice. Prebiotic feeding also resulted in decreased abundance of Bacteroidales, Helicobacter and Clostridium. High-throughput quantitative PCR showed an increased abundance of Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, Bifidobacterium lactis and Bifidobacterium gallicum in the prebiotic-fed mice. Control female mice showed a higher diversity (phylogenetic diversity (PD) = 15.1±3.4 in stools and PD = 13.0±0.6 in intestinal contents) than control males (PD = 7.8±1.6 in stool samples and PD = 9.5±1.0 in intestinal contents). GOS90 did not modify inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin (IL)-6, IL-12, IL-1β, interferon gamma and tumour necrosis factor alpha). Decreased butyrate, acetate and lactate concentrations in stools of prebiotic fed mice suggested an increase in colonic absorption and reduced excretion. Overall, our results demonstrate that GOS90 is capable of modulating the intestinal microbiome resulting in expansion of the probiome (autochtonous commensal intestinal bacteria considered to have a beneficial influence on health).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3920/bm2015.0114

Cites

91 of 91 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. American Journal of Gastreoenterology Suppl, 1, 22
  2. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73, 496S
  3. Gut, 58, A289
  4. BBioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 56, 826
  5. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 104, 305
  6. FASEB Journal 28 Suppl, 719.6
  7. merican Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 46, 61
  8. International Journal of Molecular Medicine, 25, 331
  9. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 5, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–112 of 112

Metadata

Authors
Monteagudo-Mera, A., Arthur, J. C., Jobin, C., Keku, T., Bruno-Barcena, J. M., & Azcarate-Peril, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, 4550A Thomas Hall, Campus Box 7615, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
  • Microbiome Core Facility, Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina, 312 Isaac Taylor Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Venue
Beneficial Microbes
Published
2016
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
247-264
ISSN
  • 1876-2883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-2891
OpenAlex
W2262506242
Cited by
112
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 5
FWCI
14.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Beneficial Microbes (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K01DK103952, P30‐DK34987, P30DK034987)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
galactooligosaccharides, prebiotics, Bifidobacterium, gut microbiota, germ-free mice, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum, short-chain fatty acids, butyrate, interleukin-6, inflammation, microbial diversity, Clostridiales, Bacteroidales
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Bacteria, Bifidobacterium, Female, Fermentation, Galactose, Male, Oligosaccharides, Interleukin-6, Interleukin-12, Gastrointestinal Tract, Mice, Prebiotics, Mice, 129 Strain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review