Cited by 12Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFood and Agricultural Sciences

Evaluation of the Banana (Musa paradisiaca) Plant By-product’s Fermentation Characteristics to Asses Their Fodder Potential

Amarnath, R., ., V. Balakrishnan·2007·International Journal of Dairy Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3923/ijds.2007.217.225

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amarnath, R., & ., V. B.
Venue
International Journal of Dairy Science
Publisher
Science Alert
Published
2007-06-15
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
217-225
ISSN
1811-9743 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162332210
Cited by
12
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
Keywords
banana by-products, Musa paradisiaca, fermentation characteristics, animal feed, agro-industrial waste

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review