Cited by 27Phytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesPomegranate: compositions and health benefitsMedicinal Plant Research

Antiradical Activities of Rambutan Peel: Study from Two Cultivars

Open access
Rohman, Abdul, Riyanto, Sugeng, ., Mistriyani, ., Shuhaira, Endro Nugr, Agung·2016·Research Journal of Phytochemistry

Abstract

Background: Rambutan is tropical fruit consumed either in fresh or processed fruit.The direct consumption or processing of rambutan fruit resulted in high amount of waste from peel and seed, therefore, it is necessary to take benefit from rambutan peel to be used as food supplement via antioxidant properties.Objective: This study is intended to evaluate the antiradical activities of methanolic extract and its fraction of rambutan peel from two cultivars (Aceh and Binjai) and to correlate the antiradical activities with phenolics and flavonoid contents.Methodology: The rambutan peel from two cultivar (Aceh and Binjai) is dried, macerated with methanol, evaporated and added with water.The methanolic extract is fractionated with petroleum ether, chloroform and ethyl acetate to get the corresponding fraction.Methanolic extract and its fraction are then subjected to antiradical activity measurement using synthetic DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) radical, phenolics determination and flavonoid determination.Results: The methanolic extract and its fraction,either cultivar Aceh or Binjai,revealed the high antiradical activities with similar.Ethyl acetate fraction exhibited the strongest antiradical activities among samples evaluated with IC 50 values of 2.66 µg mLG 1 (cultivar Aceh) and 2.62 µg mLG 1 (cultivar Binjai).Ethyl acetate fraction also exhibited the strongest phenolics and flavonoid contents accounting of 37.72±4.52g Gallic Acid Equivalent (GAE)/100 (Aceh) and 32.40±2.37g GAE/100 g (Binjai).The correlation between antiradical activities with phenolics and flavonoids contents showed with correlation, each with R 2 value of 0.0271 (phenolics) and 0.1122 (flavonoids).Conclusion: The methanolic extract and its fraction of rambutan peel cultivar Aceh and Binjai revealed strong DPPH antiradical activities therefore, rambutan peel can be exploited as natural antioxidant sources and is potential to be used as functional food.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3923/rjphyto.2017.42.47

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings are in agreement with studies that have shown that flavonoids and phenolic compounds are major contributors to the antioxidant activities of plant extracts.

    “These findings are in agreement with those of studies that have shown that flavonoids and phenolic compounds are major contributors to the antioxidant activities of plant extracts (Rohman et al., 2017 [65]).”

    From Comparative Analysis of Infusions and Ethanolic Extracts of Annona muricata Leaves from Colima, Mexico: Phytochemical Profile and Antioxidant Activity (2024) · cites this paper as Rohman et al., 2017 [65]

    The Results and Discussion says phenolics and flavonoids are generally known to have antioxidant activity, but the paper's own analysis finds they did not contribute significantly to radical scavenging in the rambutan peel extracts studied. It reports weak correlations, with phenolic and flavonoid contents accounting for only 2.71% and 11.22% of the variation, respectively—not a major contribution. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rohman, A., Riyanto, S., ., M., ., S., & Endro Nugr, A.
Affiliations
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Venue
Research Journal of Phytochemistry
Publisher
Science Alert
Published
2016-12-15
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
42-47
ISSN
1819-3471 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2561172886
Cited by
27
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Research Journal of Phytochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
Universitas Gadjah Mada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry (medical) › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
rambutan peel, Nephelium lappaceum, free radical scavenging, antioxidant activity, DPPH radical scavenging, methanol extract, ethyl acetate fraction, phenolic content, flavonoid content, fruit waste valorization, functional foods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review