Cited by 11Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and researchOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Pilot Testing a Couples-Focused Intervention for Mild Cognitive Impairment

Open access
Lu, Yvonne Yueh-Feng, Haase, Joan E., Weaver, Michael·2013·Journal of Gerontological Nursing

Abstract

The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and potential benefits of the multicomponent Daily Enhancement of Meaningful Activity (DEMA) intervention, which was tailored to help couples facing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) work together to meet goals, remain engaged in meaningful activities, and adapt to changes over time. Using a single-group design, 10 individuals with MCI and their family caregivers were recruited to participate in the DEMA intervention over 6 biweekly sessions. Data were collected pre- and at 1 week and 3 months postintervention. Consent, session, and questionnaire completion rates indicated the program and study procedures were well accepted. Qualitative and quantitative findings indicated positive trends in meaningful activity performance and maintenance of health-related outcomes, as well as high program satisfaction. The DEMA intervention is potentially promising but needs further testing in a randomized clinical trial.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/00989134-20130403-01

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among the 26 papers on MCI, 8 described manualized psychotherapeutic interventions and 18 described psychoeducational interventions in addition to cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, mindfulness-based stress reduction, behavioral activation, or a recovery model approach.

    “Amongst them, 8 papers described manualized psychotherapeutic interventions [36, 37, 39, 42, 43, 62–64] and 18 papers described psychoeducational interventions in addition to cognitive rehabilitation, cognitive training, mindfulness-based stress reduction, behavioral activation, or a recovery model approach [38, 44–54, 57–60, 65, 67].”

    From Psychotherapeutic interventions in individuals at risk for Alzheimer’s dementia: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [44]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lu YYF Haase JE Farran CJ 2007 Perspective of persons with mild cognitive impairment: Sense of being able Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly 8 1 45 86

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Y. Y.-F., Haase, J. E., & Weaver, M.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Venue
Journal of Gerontological Nursing
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2013-05
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
16-23
ISSN
  • 0098-9134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-243X
OpenAlex
W2056271767
Cited by
11
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontological Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Purdue University Indianapolis (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (K01NR010854, T32NR007066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, family caregivers, meaningful activities, treatment acceptability, feasibility, multicomponent intervention, older adults, program satisfaction
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Cognition Disorders, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Pilot Projects, Patient Satisfaction, Couples Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review