Cited by 4,946Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCancer-related cognitive impairment studiesNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Mild cognitive impairment – Beyond controversies, towards a consensus: Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Open access
Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V., Fratiglioni, L., Wahlund, L.‐O., Nordberg, A., Bäckman, L. +17 more·2004·Journal of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Abstract.: The First Key Symposium was held in Stockholm, Sweden, 2–5 September 2003. The aim of the symposium was to integrate clinical and epidemiological perspectives on the topic of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). A multidisciplinary, international group of experts discussed the current status and future directions of MCI, with regard to clinical presentation, cognitive and functional assessment, and the role of neuroimaging, biomarkers and genetics. Agreement on new perspectives, as well as recommendations for management and future research were discussed by the international working group. The specific recommendations for the general MCI criteria include the following: (i) the person is neither normal nor demented; (ii) there is evidence of cognitive deterioration shown by either objectively measured decline over time and/or subjective report of decline by self and/or informant in conjunction with objective cognitive deficits; and (iii) activities of daily living are preserved and complex instrumental functions are either intact or minimally impaired.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01380.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dementia severity in AD patients and the pattern of cognitive deficits in MCI patients have a great impact on the expected pattern of hippocampal regional atrophy.

    “It seems quite obvious that both the dementia severity in AD patients and the pattern of cognitive deficits in MCI patients (only amnestic, amnestic plus other domains, or not amnestic at all [41]) have a great impact on the expected pattern of hippocampal regional atrophy.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V., Fratiglioni, L., Wahlund, L. ‐., Nordberg, A., Bäckman, L., Albert, M., Almkvist, O., Arai, H., Basun, H., Blennow, K., De Leon, M., DeCarli, C., Erkinjuntti, T., Giacobini, E., Graff, C., Hardy, J., Jack, C., Jorm, A., Ritchie, K., Van Duijn, C., Visser, P., & Petersen, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Winblad, B.
Venue
Journal of Internal Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-08-20
Volume
256
Issue
3
Pages
240-246
ISSN
  • 0954-6820 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2796
OpenAlex
W2055649795
Cited by
4,946
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 157 · 2025: 234 · 2024: 272 · 2023: 228 · 2022: 267 · 2021: 271 · 2020: 306 · 2019: 292 · 2018: 248 · 2017: 263 · 2016: 267 · 2015: 284 · 2014: 256 · 2013: 263 · 2012: 254
FWCI
54.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
mild cognitive impairment, diagnostic criteria, cognitive decline, activities of daily living, functional assessment, neuroimaging, biomarkers, dementia prevention, clinical management guidelines
MeSH terms
Aged, Cognition Disorders, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Biomarkers, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review