Cited by 23Technology Use by Older AdultsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and Mobility

Involving Family Members in the Implementation and Evaluation of Technologies for Dementia: A Dyad Case Study

Open access
Lazar, Amanda, Demiris, George, Thompson, Hilaire J.·2015·Journal of Gerontological Nursing

Abstract

An increasing number of individuals worldwide are affected by dementia and it is important to examine nonpharmacological care approaches. A dyadic case study of a 6-month evaluation of a technology designed to engage individuals with dementia in activities in a memory care unit is presented. Findings show one caretaker of an individual with dementia (i.e., her mother) used the computer in a manner consistent with her usual style of interaction and supportive care; she continued to maintain awareness of her mother’s activity preferences and cultivated her mother’s quality of life by using the provided technology. These findings demonstrate a use for technology to support activities of older adults with dementia while engaging family and provide future directions for technology design and research in this population. [ Journal of Gerontological Nursing , 41 (4), 21–26.]

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/00989134-20150309-03

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lazar, A., Demiris, G., & Thompson, H. J.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Gerontological Nursing
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2015-04
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
21-26
ISSN
  • 0098-9134 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-243X
OpenAlex
W2040665885
Cited by
23
References
27
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Gerontological Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1256082)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007442)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Keywords
dementia, assistive technology, family caregivers, caregiver-child dyads, memory care units, quality of life, older adults, technology design
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Computers, Dementia, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Technology Assessment, Biomedical, United States, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review