Cited by 94Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesOnline and Blended LearningStudent Stress and Coping

Why college students procrastinate in online courses: A self-regulated learning perspective

Cheng, Sheng-Lun, Xie, Kui·2021·The Internet and Higher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100807

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 141 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheng, S.-L., & Xie, K.
Affiliations
  • Sam Houston State University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Cheng, Sheng-Lun
Venue
The Internet and Higher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
50
Pages
100807
ISSN
1096-7516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156634443
Cited by
93
References
141
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 5
FWCI
11.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Internet and Higher Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
The Ohio State University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
academic procrastination, online courses, student self-regulation, university students, technology usability, task value, emotional costs, conscientiousness, faculty engagement, peer interaction, student motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review