Cited by 9Innovations in Medical EducationHealthcare Education and Workforce IssuesNursing education and management

Tutoring for success: empowering graduate nurses after failure on the NCLEX-RN

Lutter, Stacy L., Thompson, Cheryl W., Condon, Marian C.·2017·Journal of Nursing Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Failure on the National Council Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses (NCLEX-RN) is a devastating experience. Most research related to NCLEX-RN is focused on predicting and preventing failure. Despite these efforts, more than 20,000 nursing school graduates experience failure on the NCLEX-RN each year, and there is a paucity of literature regarding remediation after failure. METHOD: The aim of this article is to describe an individualized tutoring approach centered on establishing a trusting relationship and incorporating two core strategies for remediation: the nugget method, and a six-step strategy for question analysis. RESULTS: This individualized tutoring method has been used by three nursing faculty with a 95% success rate on an NCLEX retake attempt. CONCLUSION: Further research is needed to identify the elements of this tutoring method that influence success. [J Nurs Educ. 2017;56(12):758-761.].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/01484834-20171120-11

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
Lutter, S. L., Thompson, C. W., & Condon, M. C.
Venue
Journal of Nursing Education
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2017-12
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
758-761
ISSN
  • 0148-4834 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2421
OpenAlex
W2775245136
Cited by
9
References
12
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Nursing Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
Keywords
NCLEX-RN, remediation, personalized tutoring, question analysis, nursing students, nursing faculty, trust relationships
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Achievement, Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate, Educational Measurement, Faculty, Nursing, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Licensure, Nursing, Power, Psychological, Students, Nursing, United States, Nursing Education Research, Nursing Evaluation Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review