Cited by 12Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Motivational interviewing to increase outpatient attendance for adolescent psychiatric patients.

Chiappetta, Laurel, Stark, Stacy, Mahmoud, Khadejah F., Bahnsen, Kyle R., Mitchell, Ann M.·2018·Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services

Abstract

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a therapeutic technique that has been demonstrated to increase adherence to various treatment regimens. Nonattendance at outpatient appointments is associated with read-mission to psychiatric hospitals. The purpose of the current study was to examine the effectiveness of MI in promoting treatment adherence and increasing pediatric attendance rates at patients' first follow-up appointment after inpatient admission. A sample of 111 patients discharged from one of two child and adolescent units at an urban, inpatient psychiatric hospital in Southwestern Pennsylvania participated in the MI discharge process. Compared to hospital population data from 1 month prior to the current study, the MI discharge process demonstrated an increase of approximately 10% in attendance at the scheduled follow-up appointments and a decrease of approximately 4% in cancellations and no-show appointments. It was concluded that particularly for adolescents, MI may be a valuable treatment approach grounded in partnerships with health care providers, patients, and families to enhance outpatient appointment attendance. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 56(6), 31-35.].

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3928/02793695-20180212-04

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiappetta, L., Stark, S., Mahmoud, K. F., Bahnsen, K. R., & Mitchell, A. M.
Venue
Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services
Publisher
SLACK, Inc.
Published
2018-06
Volume
56
Issue
6
Pages
31-35
ISSN
  • 0279-3695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-2413
OpenAlex
W2793837185
Cited by
12
References
21
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
motivational interviewing, adolescent psychiatric patients, medication adherence, hospital discharge, follow-up visits, appointment cancellation, inpatient psychiatric hospitalization, child psychiatry, patient-provider partnership
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Appointments and Schedules, Mental Disorders, Child, Family, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Outpatients, Patient Compliance, Patient Discharge, Pennsylvania, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review