Cited by 37Medication Adherence and CompliancePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPharmacy and Medical Practices

Evaluation of motivational interviewing to improve psychotropic medication adherence in adolescents.

Hamrin, Vanya, Iennaco, Joanne DeSanto·2017·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

PROBLEM: Medication adherence rates in adolescents are poor. The World Health Organization identified that those at greatest risk were nonwhite adolescents with depression. Medication nonadherence results in poorer mental health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The first aim of the study was to investigate if two motivational interviewing (MI) sessions would improve medication adherence in adolescents taking antidepressants and mood stabilizers. The second aim was to evaluate if attitudes toward medication correlated with adherence. The third aim was to determine if self-reported adherence scores were similar to electronic adherence data collected. METHODS: The quasi-experimental study contained an MI intervention, including a baseline and postintervention assessment of adherence over 30 days. A total of 48 adolescents, ranging in age from 12 to 18 years, were recruited from a university mental health center to participate in the study; 41 completed the study. Four nurse practitioners and two child psychiatrists mastered the MI techniques evaluated with standardized measures. The Medication Electronic Monitoring System (MEMS) was the primary measure of medication adherence. The Drug Attitude Inventory (DAI) was used as a secondary measure. Finally, participants completed the client evaluation of MI and a satisfaction survey of MI. RESULTS: At endpoint, 70.7% of the participants were taking their medications between 80% and 100% of the time, as measured over 30 days, compared with 43.9% of participants at baseline. Mean adherence scores significantly improved by 17% after two MI sessions. Mean baseline adherence scores were 63.7%, whereas mean endpoint adherence scores were 80.6% (p < 0.0001). The effect size was 0.65, demonstrating moderate effect. Participants (n = 29) who demonstrated 80% or greater adherence had DAI mean scores of 16.48, whereas those below 80% had a DAI mean of 15.5 (p = 0.73), demonstrating no significant difference on drug attitudes between the two groups at endpoint. DAI baseline mean scores were 14.2, whereas endpoint mean scores were 16.2. There was a significant difference between self-rated adherence and objective data collected from the MEMS caps as participants over-reported medication adherence by an average of 18.4% at baseline (t = 6.84, df = 40, p < 0.001). Participants reported a high degree of satisfaction with MI. CONCLUSIONS: MI is a promising intervention for adolescents to improve psychotropic medication adherence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cap.2015.0187

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamrin, V., & Iennaco, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Hamrin, Vanya
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2017-03
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
148-159
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2517100505
Cited by
37
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
motivational interviewing, medication adherence, adolescents, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, depression, electronic medication monitoring, self-reported adherence, attitudes toward drugs, treatment satisfaction, nurse practitioners, child psychiatrists
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Antidepressive Agents, Attitude to Health, Mental Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Antimanic Agents, Medication Adherence, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review