CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 82Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactantsMicrobial Fuel Cells and BioremediationEnzyme-mediated dye degradation

Microbes' role in environmental pollution and remediation: a bioeconomy focus approach

Open access
Maglione, Giuseppe, Zinno, Paola, Tropea, Alessia, Mussagy, Cassamo U., Dufossé, Laurent, Giuffrida, Daniele, Mondello, Alice·2024·AIMS Microbiology
DOI 10.3934/microbiol.2024033PMC PMC11362270
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Bioremediation stands as a promising solution amid the escalating challenges posed by environmental pollution. Over the past 25 years, the influx of synthetic chemicals and hazardous contaminants into ecosystems has required innovative approaches for mitigation and restoration. The resilience of these compounds stems from their non-natural existence, distressing both human and environmental health. Microbes take center stage in this scenario, demonstrating their ability of biodegradation to catalyze environmental remediation. Currently, the scientific community supports a straight connection between biorefinery and bioremediation concepts to encourage circular bio/economy practices. This review aimed to give a pre-overview of the state of the art regarding the main microorganisms employed in bioremediation processes and the different bioremediation approaches applied. Moreover, focus has been given to the implementation of bioremediation as a novel approach to agro-industrial waste management, highlighting how it is possible to reduce environmental pollution while still obtaining value-added products with commercial value, meeting the goals of a circular bioeconomy. The main drawbacks and challenges regarding the feasibility of bioremediation were also reported.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3934/microbiol.2024033

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Bioremediation at the in-situ level in maritime environments has problems including a lack of food, competition for carbon sources with native microbes, spreading or diluting, changes in pH and temperature, and the pollutant's bioavailability.

    “There are some problems with bioremediation at the in-situ level in maritime environments.These include a lack of food, competition for carbon sources with native microbes, spreading or diluting, changes in pH and temperature, and the pollutant's bioavailability [217,218].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [218]

    The “Factors affecting microbial bioremediation” section (page unavailable) identifies limited nutrients in marine conditions, microbial competition for carbon resources, and pollutant bioavailability as factors affecting degradation. It and “Bioremediation: green solution with hidden challenges” also discuss pH and temperature. The copy does not identify spreading or dilution as a problem, or present this full list specifically as challenges of in-situ bioremediation in maritime environments. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Bioremediation at the in-situ level in maritime environments has problems including a lack of food, competition for carbon sources with native microbes, spreading or diluting, changes in pH and temperature, and the pollutant's bioavailability.

    “There are some problems with bioremediation at the in-situ level in maritime environments.These include a lack of food, competition for carbon sources with native microbes, spreading or diluting, changes in pH and temperature, and the pollutant's bioavailability [217,218].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [217]

    The “Factors affecting microbial bioremediation” section (page unavailable) identifies limited nutrients in marine conditions, microbial competition for carbon resources, pH, temperature, and pollutant bioavailability as factors affecting degradation. It does not identify spreading or dilution as a problem, or specifically place carbon-source competition in an in-situ maritime setting. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Environmental conditions such as pH, temperature, and nutrient availability significantly impact microbial activity and the pathways utilized during bioremediation.

    “Environmental conditions such as pH, temperature, and nutrient availability significantly impact microbial activity, and the pathways utilized during bioremediation.”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [218]

  • Environmental conditions such as pH, temperature, and nutrient availability significantly impact microbial activity and the pathways utilized during bioremediation.

    “Environmental conditions such as pH, temperature, and nutrient availability significantly impact microbial activity, and the pathways utilized during bioremediation.”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [217]

  • Optimizing environmental factors can steer microbial metabolism toward complete degradation of pollutants, thereby minimizing the accumulation of toxic byproducts.

    “Optimizing these factors can steer microbial metabolism toward complete degradation of pollutants, thereby minimizing the accumulation of toxic byproducts [217,218].”

    From Harnessing bacterial consortia for effective bioremediation: targeted removal of heavy metals, hydrocarbons, and persistent pollutants (2025) · cites this paper as [218]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 176

  1. [1]Sharma P Bano A Singh SP Recent advancements in microbial-assisted remediation strategies for toxic contaminants Cleaner Chem Eng 2022 2 100020 10.1016/j.clce.2022.100020 · DOI
  2. [2]Malaviya P Sharma R Sharma S Role of microorganisms in environmental remediation and resource recovery through microbe-based technologies having major potentials de Bruijn F.J. Smidt H. Cocolin L.S. Good Microbes in Medicine, Food Production, Biotechnology, Bioremediation, and Agriculture 1 Eds. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2023 247 264 10.1002/9781119762621.ch20 · DOI
  3. [3]Mishra B Varjani S Kumar G Microbial approaches for remediation of pollutants: Innovations, future outlook, and challenges Energy Environ 2020 32 1 30 10.1177/0958305X19896781 · DOI
  4. [4]Bilal M Iqbal MNH Microbial bioremediation as a robust process to mitigate pollutants of environmental concern Case Stud Chem Environ Eng 2020 2 100011 10.1016/j.cscee.2020.100011 · DOI
  5. [5]Bala S Garg D Thirumalesh BV Recent strategies for bioremediation of emerging pollutants: a review for a green and sustainable environment Toxics 2022 10 484 10.3390/toxics10080484 36006163 PMC9413587 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [6]Kour D Kaur T Devi R Beneficial microbiomes for bioremediation of diverse contaminated environments for environmental sustainability: Present status and future challenges Environ Sci Pollut Res 2021 28 24917 24939 10.1007/s11356-021-13252-7 33768457 · DOI
  7. [7]Sangwan S Dukare A Microbe-mediated bioremediation: an eco-friendly sustainable approach for environmental clean-up Adhya T.K. Lal B. Mohapatra B. Advances in Soil Microbiology: Recent Trends and Future Prospects Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018 145 162 10.1007/978-981-10-6178-3_8 · DOI
  8. [8]Azubuike CC Chikere CB Okpokwasili GB Bioremediation techniques–classification based on site of application: principles, advantages, limitations and prospects World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2016 32 180 https://doi.org/1 0.1007/s11274-016-2137-x 27638318 PMC5026719
  9. [9]Swapnil P Singh LA Mandal C Functional characterization of microbes and their association with unwanted substance for wastewater treatment processes J Water Process Eng 2023 54 103983 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103983 · DOI
  10. [10]Xu G Zhao S Liu J Bioremediation of organohalide pollutants: progress, microbial ecology, and emerging computational tools Curr Opin Environl Sci Health 2023 32 100452 10.1016/j.coesh.2023.10045 · DOI
  11. [11]Kour D Khan SS Kour H Microbe-mediated bioremediation: Current research and future challenges J Appl Biol Biotechnol 2022 10 6 24 10.7324/JABB.2022.10s202 · DOI
  12. [12]Leong HY Chang CK Khoo KS Waste biorefinery towards a sustainable circular bioeconomy: a solution to global issues Biotechnol Biofuels 2021 14 87 10.1186/s13068-021-01939-5 33827663 PMC8028083 · DOI
  13. [13]Ayilara MS Babalola OO Bioremediation of environmental wastes: the role of microorganisms Front Agron 2023 5 1183691 10.3389/fagro.2023.1183691 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [14]Vivien FD Nieddu M Befort N The hijacking of the bioeconomy Ecol Econ 2019 159 189 197 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027 · DOI
  15. [15]Dahiya S Kumar AN Sravan JS Food waste biorefinery: Sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy Bioresour Technol 2018 248 2 12 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176 28823499 · DOI
  16. [16]Ubando AT Felix CB Chen WH Biorefineries in circular bioeconomy: A comprehensive review Bioresour Technol 2020 299 122585 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122585 31901305 · DOI
  17. [18]Guo SY Xiao CQ Zhou N Speciation, toxicity, microbial remediation and phytoremediation of soil chromium contamination Environ Chem Lett 2021 19 1413 1431 10.1007/s10311-020-01114-6 · DOI
  18. [19]Zheng YT Xiao CQ Chi RA Remediation of soil cadmium pollution by biomineralization using microbial-induced precipitation: a review World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2021 37 208 10.1007/s11274-021-03176-2 34719751 · DOI
  19. [20]Taghavi N Singhal N Zhuang WQ Degradation of plastic waste using stimulated and naturally occurring microbial strains Chemosphere 2021 263 127975 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127975 32828061 · DOI
  20. [21]Pinheiro LRS Gradíssimo DG Xavier LP Degradation of azo dyes: bacterial potential for bioremediation Sustainability 2022 14 1510 10.3390/su14031510 · DOI
  21. [22]Zeenat A Elahi DA Bukhari S Plastics degradation by microbes: A sustainable approach J King Saud Univ Sci 2021 33 101538 10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101538 · DOI
  22. [23]Liu F Tu T Li S Relationship between plankton-based β-carotene and biodegradable adaptablity to petroleum-derived hydrocarbon Chemosphere 2019 237 124430 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124430 31369904 · DOI
  23. [24]King P Anuradha K Lahari SB Biosorption of zinc from aqueous solution using Azadirachta indica bark: Equilibrium and kinetic studies J Hazard Mater 2008 152 324 329 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.101 17681426 · DOI
  24. [25]Tigini V Prigione V Giansanti P Fungal biosorption, an innovative treatment for the decolourisation and detoxification of textile effluents Water (Basel) 2010 2 550 565 10.3390/w2030550 · DOI
  25. [26]Peña-Montenegro TD Lozano L Dussán J Genome sequence and description of the mosquitocidal and heavy metal tolerant strain Lysinibacillus sphaericus CBAM5 Stand Genomic Sci 2015 10 10.1186/1944-3277-10-2 PMC4317669 25685257 · DOI
  26. [27]Fazli MM Soleimani N Mehrasbi M Highly cadmium tolerant fungi: their tolerance and removal potential J Environ Health Sci Eng 2015 13 19 10.1186/s40201-015-0176-0 25806110 PMC4372280 · DOI
  27. [28]Wu YH Zhou P Cheng H Draft genome sequence of Microbacterium profundi Shh49 T, an actinobacterium isolated from deep-sea sediment of a polymetallic nodule environment Genome Announc 2015 3 e00642-15 10.1128/genomeA.00642-15 26067975 PMC4463539 · DOI
  28. [29]Phulpoto AH Qazi MA Mangi S Biodegradation of oil-based paint by Bacillus species monocultures isolated from the paint warehouses Int J Environ Sci Technol 2016 13 125 134 10.1007/s13762-015-0851-9 · DOI
  29. [30]Rai R Vijayakumar BS Myco-remediation of textile dyes via biosorption by Aspergillus tamarii isolated from domestic wastewater Water Air Soil Pollut 2023 234 542 10.1007/s11270-023-06535-x · DOI
  30. [31]Góralczyk-Bińkowska A Długoński A Bernat P Environmental and molecular approach to dye industry waste degradation by the ascomycete fungus Nectriella pironii Sci Rep 2021 11 23829 10.1038/s41598-021-03446-x 34903810 PMC8669018 · DOI
  31. [32]Srinivasan S Sadasivam SK Biodegradation of textile azo dyes by textile effluent non-adapted and adapted Aeromonas hydrophila Environ Res 2021 194 110643 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110643 33385387 · DOI
  32. [33]Ikram M Zahoor MG Batiha ES Biodegradation and decolorization of textile dyes by bacterial strains: a biological approach for wastewater treatment Zeitschrift Für Physikalische Chemie 2021 235 1381 1393 10.1515/zpch-2020-1708 · DOI
  33. [34]Ikram M Naeem M Zahoor M Bacillus subtilis: as an efficient bacterial strain for the reclamation of water loaded with Textile Azo Dye, Orange II Int J Mol Sci 2022 23 10637 10.3390/ijms231810637 36142543 PMC9505759 · DOI
  34. [35]Priyanka JV Rajalakshmi S Kumar PS Bioremediation of soil contaminated with toxic mixed reactive azo dyes by co-cultured cells of Enterobacter cloacae and Bacillus subtilis Environ Res 2022 204 112136 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112136 34592251 · DOI
  35. [36]Saha P Sivaramakrishna A Rao KVB Bioremediation of reactive orange 16 by industrial effluent-adapted bacterial consortium VITPBC6: process optimization using response surface methodology (RSM), enzyme kinetics, pathway elucidation, and detoxification Environ Sci Pollut Res 2022 30 35450 35477 10.1007/s11356-022-24501-8 36534248 · DOI
  36. [37]Barathi S Aruljothi KN Karthik C Optimization for enhanced ecofriendly decolorization and detoxification of Reactive Blue160 textile dye by Bacillus subtilis Biotechnol Rep 2020 28 e00522 10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00522 PMC7490544 32963974 · DOI
  37. [38]Xaaldi Kalhor A Movafeghi A Mohammadi-Nassab AD Potential of the green alga Chlorella vulgaris for biodegradation of crude oil hydrocarbons Mar Pollut Bull 2017 123 286 290 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.08.045 28844453 · DOI
  38. [39]Varjani SJ Upasani VN Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by oleophilic strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa NCIM 5514 Bioresour Technol 2016 222 195 201 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.006 27718402 · DOI
  39. [40]Baoune H Hadj-Khelil AOE Pucci G Petroleum degradation by endophytic Streptomyces spp. isolated from plants grown in contaminated soil of southern Algeria Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 2018 147 602 609 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.013 28923725 · DOI
  40. [41]Li SW Liu MY Yang RQ Comparative genome characterization of a petroleum-degrading Bacillus subtilis strain DM2 Int J Genomics 2019 8 1 16 10.1155/2019/7410823 PMC6530121 31205931 · DOI
  41. [42]Wang D Lin J Lin J Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by Bacillus subtilis BL-27, a strain with weak hydrophobicity Molecules 2019 24 3021 10.3390/molecules24173021 31438460 PMC6749392 · DOI
  42. [43]Othman AR Ismail NS Abdullah SRS Potential of indigenous biosurfactant-producing fungi from real crude oil sludge in total petroleum hydrocarbon degradation and its future research prospects J Environ Chem Eng 2022 10 107621 10.1016/j.jece.2022.107621 · DOI
  43. [44]Horton AA Plastic pollution: When do we know enough? J Hazard Mater 2021 422 126885 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126885 34418830 · DOI
  44. [45]Li P Wang X Su M Characteristics of plastic pollution in the environment: a review Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 2021 107 577 584 10.1007/s00128-020-02820-1 32166334 · DOI
  45. [46]Iroegbu AOC Ray SS Mbarane V Plastic pollution: a perspective on matters arising: challenges and opportunities ACS Omega 2021 6 19343 19355 10.1021/acsomega.1c02760 34368521 PMC8340096 · DOI
  46. [47]Maroof L Khan I Yoo HS Identification and characterization of low density polyethylene-degrading bacteria isolated from soils of waste disposal sites Environ Eng Res 2020 10.4491/eer.2020.167 · DOI
  47. [48]Munir E Harefa RSM Priyani N Plastic degrading fungi Trichoderma viride and Aspergillus nomius isolated from local landfill soil in Medan IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 2018 126 012145 10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012145 · DOI · Paper page
  48. [49]Muhonja CN Makonde H Magoma G Biodegradability of polyethylene by bacteria and fungi from Dandora dumpsite Nairobi-Kenya PLoS One 2018 13 e0198446 10.1371/journal.pone.0198446 29979708 PMC6034791 · DOI
  49. [50]Awasthi S Srivastava P Singh P Biodegradation of thermally treated high-density polyethylene (HDPE) by Klebsiella pneumoniae CH0013 Biotech 2017 7 332 10.1007/s13205-017-0959-3 PMC5603451 28955629 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [51]Zhou H Gao X Wang S Enhanced bioremediation of aged polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil using immobilized microbial consortia combined with strengthening remediation strategies Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023 20 1766 10.3390/ijerph20031766 36767132 PMC9914441 · DOI · Paper page
  51. [52]Lü H Wei JL Tang GX Microbial consortium degrading of organic pollutants: Source, degradation efficiency, pathway, mechanism and application J Clean Prod 2024 451 141913 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141913 · DOI
  52. [53]Kulshreshtha S Genetically engineered microorganisms: a problem solving approach for bioremediation J Bioremed Biodeg 2013 4 e133 10.4172/2155-6199.1000e133 · DOI
  53. [54]Cases I de Lorenzo V Genetically modified organisms for the environment: stories of success and failure and what we have learned from them Int Microbiol 2005 8 213 222 16200500
  54. [55]Mejare M Bulow L Metal-binding proteins and peptides in bioremediation and phytoremediation of heavy metals Trends Biotech 2001 19 67 73 10.1016/S0167-7799(00)01534-1 11164556 · DOI
  55. [57]Liu S Zhang F Chen J Arsenic removal from contaminated soil via biovolatilization by genetically engineered bacteria under laboratory conditions J Environ Sci 2011 9 1544 1550 10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60570-0 22432292 · DOI
  56. [58]Sharma B Shukla P Futuristic avenues of metabolic engineering techniques in bioremediation Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2022 69 51 60 10.1002/bab.2080 33242354 · DOI
  57. [59]Gupta S Shukla P Gene editing for cell engineering: trends and applications Crit Rev Biotechnol 2017 37 672 684 10.1080/07388551.2016.1214557 27535623 · DOI
  58. [60]Wuana RA Okieimen FE Heavy metals in contaminated soils: a review of sources, chemistry, risks and best available strategies for remediation Int Scholarly Res Not 2011 2011 402647 10.5402/2011/402647 · DOI
  59. [61]Bayata A The future insight on bioremediation of contaminated soils-review Intl J Eng Sci Technol Innovation 2023 3 1 32
  60. [62]Singh S Mulchandani A Chen W Highly selective and rapid arsenic removal by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli cells expressing Fucus vesiculosus Metallothionein Appl Environ Microbiol 2008 74 2924 2927 10.1128/AEM.02871-07 18326684 PMC2394894 · DOI
  61. [63]Yuan C Lu X Qin J Volatile arsenic species released from Escherichia coli expressing the asiii s-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase gene Environ Sci Technol 2008 42 3201 3206 10.1021/es702910g 18522094 PMC4591914 · DOI
  62. [64]Kostal J Yang R Wu CH Enhanced arsenic accumulation in engineered bacterial cells expressing ArsR Appl Environ Microbiol 2004 70 4582 4587 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4582-4587.2004 15294789 PMC492386 · DOI
  63. [65]Zhang J Xu Y Cao T Arsenic methylation by a genetically engineered Rhizobium-legume symbiont Plant Soil 2017 416 259 269 10.1007/s11104-017-3207-z 29632416 PMC5889086 · DOI
  64. [66]Ivask A Dubourguier HC Põllumaa L Bioavailability of Cd in 110 polluted top soils to recombinant bioluminescent sensor bacteria: effect of soil particulate matter J Soils Sediments 2011 11 231 237 10.1007/s11368-010-0292-5 · DOI
  65. [67]Patel J Zhang Q McKay RML Genetic engineering of Caulobacter crescentus for removal of cadmium from water Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2010 160 232 243 10.1007/s12010-009-8540-0 19214794 · DOI
  66. [68]Bondarenko O Rõlova T Kahru A Bioavailability of Cd, Zn and Hg in soil to nine recombinant luminescent metal sensor bacteria Sensors 2008 8 6899 6923 10.3390/s8116899 27873907 PMC3787422 · DOI
  67. [69]Kang SH Singh S Kim JY Bacteria metabolically engineered for enhanced phytochelatin production and cadmium accumulation Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 73 6317 6320 10.1128/AEM.01237-07 17675418 PMC2075016 · DOI
  68. [70]Deng X Yi XE Liu G Cadmium removal from aqueous solution by gene-modified Escherichia coli JM109 J Hazard Mater 2007 139 340 344 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.043 16890348 · DOI
  69. [71]Wu CH Wood TK Mulchandani A Engineering plant-microbe symbiosis for rhizoremediation of heavy metals Appl Environ Microbiol 2006 72 1129 1134 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1129-1134.2006 16461658 PMC1392951 · DOI
  70. [72]Sriprang R Hayashi M Ono H Enhanced accumulation of Cd2+ by a Mesorhizobium sp. transformed with a gene from arabidopsis thaliana coding for phytochelatin synthase Appl Environ Microbiol 2003 69 1791 1796 10.1128/AEM.69.3.1791-1796.2003 12620871 PMC150072 · DOI
  71. [73]Valls M Atrian S de Lorenzo V Engineering a mouse metallothionein on the cell surface of Ralstonia eutropha CH34 for immobilization of heavy metals in soil Nat Biotechnol 2000 18 661 665 10.1038/76516 10835606 · DOI
  72. [74]Freeman JL Persans MW Nieman K Nickel and cobalt resistance engineered in Escherichia coli by overexpression of serine acetyltransferase from the nickel hyperaccumulator plant Thlaspi goesingense Appl Environ Microbiol 2005 71 8627 8633 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8627-8633.2005 16332856 PMC1317400 · DOI
  73. [75]López A Lázaro N Morales S Nickel biosorption by free and immobilized cells of Pseudomonas fluorescens 4F39: a comparative study Water Air Soil Pollut 2002 135 157 172 10.1023/A:1014706827124 · DOI
  74. [76]Kim IH Choi JH Joo JO Development of a microbe-zeolite carrier for the effective elimination of heavy metals from seawater J Microbiol Biotechnol 2015 25 1542 1546 10.4014/jmb.1504.04067 26032363 · DOI
  75. [77]Deng X Li QB Lu YH Genetic engineering of Escherichia coli SE5000 and its potential for Ni2+ bioremediation Process Biochem 2005 40 425 430 10.1016/j.procbio.2004.01.019 · DOI
  76. [78]Akkurt Ş Oğuz M Alkan Uçkun A Bioreduction and bioremoval of hexavalent chromium by genetically engineered strains (Escherichia coli MT2A and Escherichia coli MT3) World J Microbiol Biotechnol 2022 38 45 10.1007/s11274-022-03235-2 35075546 · DOI
  77. [79]Li Q Li J Kang KL A safety type of genetically engineered bacterium that degrades chemical pesticides AMB Express 2020 10 33 10.1186/s13568-020-00967-y 32072335 PMC7028883 · DOI
  78. [80]Feng F Ge J Li Y Isolation, colonization, and chlorpyrifos degradation mediation of the endophytic Bacterium Sphingomonas strain hjy in chinese chives (Allium tuberosum) J Agric Food Chem 2017 65 1131 1138 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05283 28103027 · DOI
  79. [81]Luo X Zhang D Zhou X Cloning and characterization of a pyrethroid pesticide decomposing esterase gene, Est3385, from Rhodopseudomonas palustris PSB-S Sci Rep 2018 8 7384 10.1038/s41598-018-25734-9 29743662 PMC5943319 · DOI
  80. [82]Barac T Taghavi S Borremans B Engineered endophytic bacteria improve phytoremediation of water-soluble, volatile, organic pollutants Nat Biotechnol 2004 22 583 588 10.1038/nbt960 15077119 · DOI
  81. [83]Sun Y Zhao X Zhang D New naphthalene whole-cell bioreporter for measuring and assessing naphthalene in polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons contaminated site Chemosphere 2017 186 510 518 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.027 28810221 · DOI
  82. [84]Samin G Pavlova M Arif MI A Pseudomonas putida strain genetically engineered for 1,2,3-trichloropropane bioremediation Appl Environ Microbiol 2014 80 5467 5476 10.1128/AEM.01620-14 24973068 PMC4136109 · DOI
  83. [85]Qiao W Chu J Ding S Characterization of a thermo-alkali-stable laccase from Bacillus subtilis cjp3 and its application in dyes decolorization J Environ Sci Health 2017 52 710 717 10.1080/10934529.2017.1301747 28358283 · DOI
  84. [86]Suzuki T Nishizawa A Kikuchi M Biphenyl degradation by recombinant photosynthetic cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 in an oligotrophic environment using unphysiological electron transfer Biochem J 2019 12476 3615 3630 10.1042/BCJ20190731 31738393 · DOI
  85. [87]Wang Y Jiang Q Zhou C In-situ remediation of contaminated farmland by horizontal transfer of degradative plasmids among rhizosphere bacteria Soil Use and Manage 2014 30 303 309 10.1111/sum.12105 · DOI
  86. [88]Jussila MM Zhao J Suominen L TOL plasmid transfer during bacterial conjugation in vitro and rhizoremediation of oil compounds in vivo Environ Pollut 2007 146 510 524 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.07.012 17000041 · DOI
  87. [89]Maj A Dziewit L Drewniak L In vivo creation of plasmid pCRT01 and its use for the construction of carotenoid-producing Paracoccus spp. strains that grow efficiently on industrial wastes Microb Cell Fact 2020 19 141 10.1186/s12934-020-01396-z 32660485 PMC7359593 · DOI
  88. [90]Furubayashi M Kubo A Takemura M Capsanthin production in Escherichia coli by overexpression of Capsanthin/Capsorubin synthase from Capsicum annuum J Agric Food Chem 2021 69 5076 5085 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00083 33890772 · DOI
  89. [91]Zheng X Hu R Chen D Lipid and carotenoid production by the Rhodosporidium toruloides mutant in cane molasses Bioresour Technol 2021 326 124816 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124816 33563516 · DOI
  90. [92]Yang P Wu Y Zheng Z CRISPR-Cas9 approach constructing cellulase sestc-engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae for the production of orange peel ethanol Front Microbiol 2018 9 2436 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02436 30364071 PMC6191481 · DOI
  91. [93]Cunha JT Soares PO Baptista SL Engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae for lignocellulosic valorization: a review and perspectives on bioethanol production Bioengineered 2020 11 883 903 10.1080/21655979.2020.1801178 32799606 PMC8291843 · DOI
  92. [94]Saravanan A Kumar PS Duc PA Strategies for microbial bioremediation of environmental pollutants from industrial wastewater: A sustainable approach Chemosphere 2023 313 137323 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137323 36410512 · DOI · Paper page
  93. [95]Lahel A Fanta AB Sergienko N Effect of process parameters on the bioremediation of diesel contaminated soil by mixed microbial consortia Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 2016 113 375 385 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.05.005 · DOI
  94. [96]Abatenh E Gizaw B Tsegaye Z The role of microorganisms in bioremediation-A review Open J Environ Biol 2017 2 030 046 10.17352/ojeb.000007 · DOI
  95. [97]Leong YK Chang JS Bioremediation of heavy metals using microalgae: Recent advances and mechanisms Bioresour Technol 2020 303 122886 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122886 32046940 · DOI · Paper page
  96. [99]Naidu R Semple KT Megharaj M Bioavailability, definition, assessment and implications for risk assessment Dev Soil Sci 2008 32 39 52 10.1016/S0166-2481(07)32003-5 · DOI
  97. [100]Delille D Coulon F Pelletier E Effects of temperature warming during a bioremediation study of natural and nutrient-amended hydrocarbon-contaminated sub-Antarctic soils Cold Reg Sci Technol 2004 40 61 70 10.1016/j.coldregions.2004.05.005 · DOI
  98. [101]Macaulay BM Understanding the behavior of oil-degrading microorganisms to enhance the microbial remediation of spilled petroleum Appl Ecol Environ Res 2015 13 247 262 10.15666/aeer/1301_247262 · DOI
  99. [102]da Cruz GF de Vasconcellos SP Angolini CF Could petroleum biodegradation be a joint achievement of aerobic and anaerobic microrganisms in deep sea reservoirs? AMB Express 2011 1 47 10.1186/2191-0855-1-47 22196374 PMC3279308 · DOI
  100. [104]Srivastava J Naraian R Kalra SJS Advances in microbial bioremediation and the factors influencing the process Int J Environl Sci Technol 2013 11 1787 1800 10.1007/s13762-013-0412-z · DOI
  101. [105]Margesin R Fonteyne P Schinner F Rhodotorula psychrophila sp. nov., Rhodotorula psychrophenolica sp. nov. and Rhodotorula glacialis sp. nov., novel psychrophilic basidiomycetous yeast species isolated from alpine environments Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007 57 2179 2184 10.1099/ijs.0.65111-0 17766895 · DOI
  102. [106]Krallish I Gonta S Savenkova L Phenol degradation by immobilized cold-adapted yeast strains of Cryptococcus terreus and Rhodotorula creatinivora Extremophiles 2006 10 441 449 10.1007/s00792-006-0517- 16601913 · DOI
  103. [107]Shrestha P Karmacharya J Han SR Elucidation of cold adaptation in Glaciimonas sp. PAMC28666 with special focus on trehalose biosynthesis Front Microbiol 2023 14 1280775 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1280775 37920266 PMC10618363 · DOI
  104. [108]Koning M Hupe K Stegmann R Thermal processes, scrubbing/extraction, bioremediation and disposal Biotechnology 2000 11 306 317 10.1002/9783527620999.ch12m · DOI
  105. [109]Tahir ML Bubarai U Bapetel U Bioremediation process and techniques a strategy to restore agricultural soil productivity: A Review Int J Res Trends Innovation 2022
  106. [110]Machackova JZ Wittlingerova KV Zima J Major factors affecting in situ biodegradation rates of jet-fuel during large-scale biosparging project in sedimentary bedrock J Environ Sci Health 2012 47 1152 1165 10.1080/10934529.2012.668379 22506708 · DOI
  107. [111]Khudur LS Shahsavari E Miranda AF Evaluating the efficacy of bioremediating a diesel-contaminated soil using ecotoxicological and bacterial community indices Environ Sci Pollut Res 2015 22 14809 14819 10.1007/s11356-015-4624-2 25989854 · DOI
  108. [112]Feola R Biosparging: efficacia ed economicità per i siti contaminati da idrocarburi Authorea 2020 10.22541/au.159318793.37106111 · DOI
  109. [113]Chakrabartty M Harun-Or-Rashid GM Feasibility study of the soil remediation technologies in the natural environment Am J Civ Eng 2021 9 91 98 10.11648/j.ajce.20210904.11 · DOI
  110. [114]Benyahia F Abdulkarim M Zekri A Bioremediation of crude oil contaminated soils Process Saf Environ Prot 2005 83 364 370 10.1205/psep.04388 · DOI
  111. [115]Naeem U Qazi MA Leading edges in bioremediation technologies for removal of petroleum hydrocarbons Environ Sci Pollut Res 2020 27 27370 27382 10.1007/s11356-019-06124-8 31392621 · DOI
  112. [116]Pandey K Shrivastava A Bioremediation of lead contaminated soil using bacteria Res J Life Sci Bioinfomatic Pharm Chem Sci 2018 10 3528 10.26479/2018.0404.31 · DOI
  113. [117]Conteratto C Dalzotto AF Benedetti SO Biorefinery: A comprehensive concept for the sociotechnical transition toward bioeconomy Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 2021 151 111527 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111527 · DOI
  114. [118]Moncada J El-Halwagi MM Cardona CA Techno-economic analysis for a sugarcane biorefinery: Colombian case Bioresour Technol 2013 135 533 543 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.137 23021947 · DOI
  115. [119]Yaashikaa PR Senthil KP Varjani S Valorization of agro-industrial wastes for biorefinery process and circular bioeconomy: A critical review Bioresour Technol 2022 343 126126 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126126 34673193 · DOI
  116. [120]Usmani Z Sharma M Sudheer S Engineered microbes for pigment production using waste biomass Curr Genomics 2020 21 80 95 10.2174/1389202921999200330152007 32655303 PMC7324876 · DOI
  117. [121]Sodhi AS Sharma N Bhatia S Insights on sustainable approaches for production and applications of value added products Chemosphere 2021 2021 131623 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131623 34346348 · DOI
  118. [122]Wu KC Ho KC Tang CC The potential of foodwaste leachate as a phycoremediation substrate for microalgal CO2 fixation and biodiesel production Environ Sci Pollut Res 2018 25 40724 40734 10.1007/s11356-018-1242-9 29504078 · DOI
  119. [123]Hadj SJ Bertani G Levante A Fermentation of agri-food waste: a promising route for the production of aroma compounds Foods 2021 10 707 10.3390/foods10040707 33810435 PMC8066995 · DOI · Paper page
  120. [124]Grewal J Wołacewicz M Pyter W Colorful treasure from agro-industrial wastes: a sustainable chassis for microbial pigment production Front Microbiol 2022 13 832918 10.3389/fmicb.2022.832918 35173704 PMC8841802 · DOI
  121. [125]Jatoi AS Abbasi SA Hashmi Z Recent trends and future perspectives of lignocellulose biomass for biofuel production: a comprehensive review Biomass Convers Biorefinery 2021 13 6457 6469 https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s13399-021-01853-8 · DOI
  122. [126]Tropea A Biofuels production and processing technology Fermentation 2022 8 319 10.3390/fermentation8070319 · DOI · Paper page
  123. [127]Grewal J Khare SK 2-Pyrrolidone synthesis from g-aminobutyric acid produced by Lactobacillus brevis under solid-state fermentation utilizing toxic deoiled cottonseed cake Bioproc Biosyst Eng 2017 40 145 152 10.1007/s00449-016-1683-9 27646908 · DOI
  124. [128]Grewal J Khare SK One-pot bioprocess for lactic acid production from lignocellulosic agro-wastes by using ionic liquid stable Lactobacillus brevis Bioresour Technol 2018 251 268 273 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.056 29288954 · DOI
  125. [129]Grewal J Tiwari R Khare SK Secretome analysis and bioprospecting of lignocellulolytic fungal consortium for valorization of waste cottonseed cake by hydrolase production and simultaneous gossypol degradation Waste Biomass Valorizat 2020 11 2533 2548 10.1007/s12649-019-00620-1 · DOI
  126. [131]Banu JR Kavitha S Tyagi VK Lignocellulosic biomass based biorefinery: A successful platform towards circular bioeconomy Fuel 2021 302 121086 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121086 · DOI
  127. [133]Balbino TR Sanchez-Munoz S Díaz-Ruíz E Lignocellulosic biorefineries as a platform for the production of high-value yeast derived pigments–A review Bioresour Technol 2023 386 129549 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129549 37499926 · DOI
  128. [134]Tropea A Foodwaste. valorization Fermentation 2022 8 168 10.3390/fermentation8040168 · DOI
  129. [135]Anupong W Jutamas K On-uma R Sustainable bioremediation approach to treat the sago industry effluents and evaluate the possibility of yielded biomass as a single cell protein (SCP) using cyanide tolerant Streptomyces tritici D5 Chemosphere 2022 304 135248 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135248 35679978 · DOI
  130. [136]Ayadi I Kamoun O Trigui‑Lahiani H Single cell oil production from a newly isolated Candida viswanathii Y‑E4 and agro‑industrial by‑products valorization J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2016 43 901 914 10.1007/s10295-016-1772-4 27114386 · DOI
  131. [137]Kothri M Mavrommati M Elazzazy AM Microbial sources of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) and the prospect of organic residues and wastes as growth media for PUFA-producing microorganisms FEMS Microbiol Lett 2020 367 fnaa028 10.1093/femsle/fnaa028 32053204 · DOI
  132. [138]Rafiq S Bhat MI Sofi SA Bioconversion of agri-food waste and by-products into microbial lipids: Mechanism, cultivation strategies and potential in food applications Trends Food Sci Technol 2023 139 104118 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.07.015 · DOI
  133. [139]Sekoai PT Roets-Dlamini Y O'Brien F Valorization of food waste into single-cell protein: an innovative technological strategy for sustainable protein production Microorganisms 2024 12 166 10.3390/microorganisms12010166 38257991 PMC10819637 · DOI
  134. [140]Alves Cardoso S Díaz-Ruiz E Lisboa B Microbial meat: A sustainable vegan protein source produced from agri-waste to feed the world Food Res Int 2023 166 112596 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112596 36914347 · DOI
  135. [141]LaTurner W Zachary BNG San KY Single cell protein production from food waste using purple nonsulfur bacteria shows economically viable protein products have higher environmental impacts J Cleaner Prod 2020 276 123114 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123114 · DOI
  136. [142]Koukoumaki DI Tsouko E Papanikolaou S Recent advances in the production of single cell protein from renewable resources and applications Carbon Resour Convers 2024 7 100195 10.1016/j.crcon.2023.07.004 · DOI
  137. [143]Kumar Y Kaur S Kheto A Cultivation of microalgae on food waste: Recent advances and way forward Bioresour Technol 2022 363 127834 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127834 36029984 · DOI
  138. [144]Gaykawad SS Ramanand SS Blomqvist J Submerged fermentation of animal fat by-products by oleaginous filamentous fungi for the production of unsaturated single cell oil Fermentation 2021 7 300 10.3390/fermentation7040300 · DOI
  139. [145]Saad MG Dosoky NS Zoromba MS Algal biofuels: current status and key challenges Energies 2019 12 1920 10.3390/en12101920 · DOI · Paper page
  140. [146]Das PK Rani J Rawat S Microalgal co-cultivation for biofuel production and bioremediation: current status and benefits BioEnergy Res 2021 15 1 26 10.1007/s12155-021-10254-8 · DOI
  141. [147]Wang Y Le Quyet V Yang H Progress in microbial biomass conversion into green energy Chemosphere 2021 281 130835 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130835 33992848 · DOI
  142. [148]Salafia F Ferracane A Tropea A Pineapple waste cell wall sugar fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae for second generation bioethanol production Fermentation 2022 8 100 10.3390/fermentation8030100 · DOI
  143. [149]Yadav M Joshi C Paritosh K Organic waste conversion through anaerobic digestion: A critical insight into the metabolic pathways and microbial interactions Metab Eng 2022 69 323 337 10.1016/j.ymben.2021.11.014 34864213 · DOI
  144. [150]Huang J Feng H Huang L Continuous hydrogen production from food waste by anaerobic digestion (AD) coupled single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) under negative pressure Waste Manag 2020 103 61 66 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.015 31865036 · DOI
  145. [151]Gautam R Nayak JK Ress NV Bio-hydrogen production through microbial electrolysis cell: Structural components and influencing factors Chem Eng J 2023 455 140535 10.1016/j.cej.2022.140535 · DOI
  146. [152]Teoh TP Ong SA Ho LN Up-flow constructed wetland-microbial fuel cell: Influence of floating plant, aeration and circuit connection on wastewater treatment performance and bioelectricity generation J Water Process Eng 2020 36 101371 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101371 · DOI
  147. [153]Pandit S Savla N Sonawane JM Agricultural waste and wastewater as feedstock for bioelectricity generation using microbial fuel cells: recent advances Fermentation 2021 7 169 10.3390/fermentation7030169 · DOI
  148. [154]Kumar SD Yasasve M Karthigadevi G Efficiency of microbial fuel cells in the treatment and energy recovery from food wastes: Trends and applications-A review Chemosphere 2022 287 132439 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132439 34606889 · DOI
  149. [155]Saravanan K Umesh M Kathirvel P Microbial Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs): a review on biosynthesis, properties, fermentation strategies and its prospective applications for sustainable future J Polym Environ 2022 30 4903 4935 10.1007/s10924-022-02562-7 · DOI
  150. [156]Kalathinathan P Muthukaliannan GK Characterisation of a potential probiotic strain Paracoccus marcusii KGP and its application in whey bioremediation Folia Microbiol 2021 66 819 830 10.1007/s12223-021-00886-w 34148171 · DOI
  151. [157]Javaid H Nawaz A Riaz N Biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) by the valorization of biomass and synthetic waste Molecules 2020 25 5539 https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules2 52355 39 33255864 PMC7728366 · DOI
  152. [158]Kumar V Lakkaboyana SK Tsouko E Commercialization potential of agro-based polyhydroxyalkanoates biorefinery: A technical perspective on advances and critical barriers Int J Biol Macromol 2023 234 123733 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123733 36801274 · DOI
  153. [159]Kalia VC Patel SKS Shanmugam R Polyhydroxyalkanoates: Trends and advances toward biotechnological applications Bioresour Technol 2021 326 124737 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124737 33515915 · DOI
  154. [160]Khomlaem C Aloui H Singhvi M Production of polyhydroxyalkanoates and astaxanthin from lignocellulosic biomass in high cell density membrane bioreactor Chem Eng J 2023 451 138641 10.1016/j.cej.2022.138641 · DOI
  155. [161]Mozejko-Ciesielska J Marciniak P Moraczewski K Cheese whey mother liquor as dairy waste with potential value for polyhydroxyalkanoate production by extremophilic Paracoccus homiensis Sustain Mater Technol 2022 33 e00449 10.1016/j.susmat.2022.e00449 · DOI
  156. [162]Aruldass CA Dufossè L Ahmad WA Current perspective of yellowish-orange pigments from microorganisms-a review J Cleaner Prod 2018 180 168 182 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.093 · DOI
  157. [163]Liu J Luo Y Guo T Cost-effective pigment production by Monascus purpureus using rice straw hydrolysate as substrate in submerged fermentation J Biosci Bioeng 2020 129 229 236 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2019.08.007 31500988 · DOI
  158. [164]Lopes FC Tichota DM Pereira JQ Pigment production by filamentous fungi on agroindustrial byproducts: an eco-friendly alternative Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2013 171 616 625 10.1007/s12010-013-0392-y 23873642 · DOI
  159. [165]Rapoport A Guzhova I Bernetti L Carotenoids and some other pigments from fungi and yeasts Metabolites 2021 11 92 10.3390/metabo11020092 33561985 PMC7915786 · DOI
  160. [166]Pailliè-Jiménez ME Stincone P Brandelli A Natural pigments of microbial origin Front Sustain Food Syst 2020 4 160 10.3389/fsufs.2020.590439 · DOI
  161. [167]Arashiro LT Boto-Ordóñez M Van Hulle SWH Natural pigments from microalgae grown in industrial wastewater Bioresour Technol 2020 303 122894 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122894 32032937 · DOI
  162. [168]Rishu K Suchitra G Mayurika G Microalgae bioremediation: A perspective towards wastewater treatment along with industrial carotenoids production J Water Process Eng 2021 40 101794 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101794 · DOI · Paper page
  163. [169]de Bruijn FJ Smidt H Cocolin LS Good Microbes in Medicine, Food Production, Biotechnology, Bioremediation, and Agriculture John Wiley & Sons Ltd 2023 10.1002/9781119762621 · DOI
  164. [170]Sundaram T Govindarajan RK Vinayagam S Advancements in biosurfactant production using agroindustrial waste for industrial and environmental applications Front Microbiol 2024 15 1357302 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1357302 38374917 PMC10876000 · DOI
  165. [171]Datta D Ghosh S Kumar S Microbial biosurfactants: Multifarious applications in sustainable agriculture Microbiol Res 2024 279 127551 10.1016/j.micres.2023.127551 38016380 · DOI
  166. [173]Kiran EU Trzcinski AP Ng WJ Enzyme production from food wastes using a biorefinery concept Waste Biomass Valor 2014 5 903 917 10.1007/s12649-014-9311-x · DOI
  167. [174]Kumar V Shahi SK Singh S Bioremediation: an eco-sustainable approach for restoration of contaminated sites Microb Bioprospect Sustain Dev 2018 115–136 10.1007/978-981-13-0053-0_6 · DOI
  168. [175]Caldeira C Vlysidis A Fiore G Sustainability of food waste biorefinery: A review on valorisation pathways, techno-economic constraints, and environmental assessment Bioresour Technol 2020 312 123575 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123575 32521468 · DOI
  169. [176]Vishwakarma GS Bhattacharjee G Gohil N Current status, challenges and future of bioremediation Biorem Pollut 2020 403–415 10.1016/b978-0-12-819025-8.00020-x · DOI
  170. [177]Azubuike CC Chikere CB Okpokwasili GC Bioremediation: an eco-friendly sustainable technology for environmental management Saxena G. Bharagava R. Bioremediation of Industrial Waste for Environmental Safety Eds Springer, Singapore 2020 1 19 40 10.1007/978-981-13-1891-7_2 · DOI
  171. [178]Vidali M Bioremediation: an overview Pure Appl Chem 2001 73 1163 1172 10.1351/pac200173071163 · DOI
  172. [179]Alori ET Gabasawa AI Elenwo CE Bioremediation techniques as affected by limiting factors in soil environment Front Soil Sci 2022 2 937186 10.3389/fsoil.2022.937186 · DOI
  173. [180]Hartman B Mustian M Cunningham C Legal and regulatory frameworks for bioremediation Atlas R.M. Philip J. Bioremediation: Applied Microbial Solutions for Real-World Environmental Cleanup ASM Press 2014 86 107 10.1128/9781555817596.ch3 · DOI
  174. [181]Kocher S Levi D Aboud R Public attitudes toward the use of bioremediation to clean up toxic contamination J Appl Social Psychol 2002 32 1756 1770 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb02774.x · DOI
  175. [182]Kumar V Sharma N Umesh M Emerging challenges for the agro-industrial food waste utilization: A review on food waste biorefinery Bioresour Technol 2022 362 127790 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127790 35973569 · DOI
  176. [184]Boopathy R Factors limiting bioremediation technologies Bioresour Technol 2000 74 63 67 10.1016/s0960-8524(99)00144-3 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maglione, G., Zinno, P., Tropea, A., Mussagy, C. U., Dufossé, L., Giuffrida, D., & Mondello, A.
Affiliations
  • Istituto per il Sistema Produzione Animale in Ambiente Mediterraneo (IT)
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (CL)
  • University of Reunion Island (RE)
Corresponding author
Tropea, Alessia
ORCID
Venue
AIMS Microbiology
Publisher
American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS)
Published
2024
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
723-755
ISSN
2471-1888 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3934/microbiol.2024033
PMC
PMC11362270
OpenAlex
W4401818259
Cited by
82
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • AIMS Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Enzyme-mediated dye degradation
Keywords
bioremediation, biodegradation, environmental pollution, circular bioeconomy, biorefinery, agro-industrial waste management, synthetic compounds, hazardous contaminants, microbial bioremediation, value-added products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review