Cited by 355Magnesium in Health and DiseaseNutritional Studies and DietMagnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications

Circulating and dietary magnesium and risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies

Open access
Del Gobbo, Liana C, Imamura, Fumiaki, Wu, Jason HY, de Oliveira Otto, Marcia C, Chiuve, Stephanie E, Mozaffarian, Dariush·2013·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background Clinical hypomagnesemia and experimental restriction of dietary magnesium increase cardiac arrhythmias. However, whether or not circulating or dietary magnesium at usual concentrations or intakes influences the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including fatal ischemic heart disease (IHD), is unclear.Objective We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate prospective associations of circulating and dietary magnesium with incidence of CVD, IHD, and fatal IHD.Design Multiple literature databases were systematically searched without language restriction through May 2012. Inclusion decisions and data extraction were performed in duplicate. Linear dose-response associations were assessed by using random-effects meta-regression. Potential nonlinear associations were evaluated by using restricted cubic splines.Results Of 2303 articles, 16 studies met the eligibility criteria; these studies comprised 313,041 individuals and 11,995 CVD, 7534 IHD, and 2686 fatal IHD events. Circulating magnesium (per 0.2 mmol/L increment) was associated with a 30% lower risk of CVD (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56, 0.88 per 0.2 mmol/L) and trends toward lower risks of IHD (RR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.05) and fatal IHD (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.37, 1.00). Dietary magnesium (per 200-mg/d increment) was not significantly associated with CVD (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.75, 1.05) but was associated with a 22% lower risk of IHD (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.92). The association of dietary magnesium with fatal IHD was nonlinear (P < 0.001), with an inverse association observed up to a threshold of ∼250 mg/d (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62, 0.86), compared with lower intakes.Conclusion Circulating and dietary magnesium are inversely associated with CVD risk, which supports the need for clinical trials to evaluate the potential role of magnesium in the prevention of CVD and IHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.112.053132

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. AHA (ECC Guidelines). Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care, Part 8: Advanced challenges in resuscitation: Section 1: Life-threatening electrolyte abnormalities. Circulation 2000;102:I217-22.
  2. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of obser- vational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000; 283:2008-12.
  3. Institute of Medicine (IOM). Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, vitamin D, and fluoride. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1997.
  4. Saris NE, Mervaala E, Karppanen H, Khawaja JA, Lewenstam A. Magnesium: an update on physiological, clinical and analytical as- pects. Clin Chim Acta 2000;294:1-26.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Del Gobbo, L. C., Imamura, F., Wu, J. H., de Oliveira Otto, M. C., Chiuve, S. E., & Mozaffarian, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
160-173
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100809193
Cited by
355
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R21HL109924, HL085710, 3R01-HL085710-03S1, R01HL085710)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Magnesium in Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Magnesium Alloys: Properties and Applications
Keywords
magnesium, dietary magnesium, cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease, dose-response relationship, nonlinear relationship, cardiovascular risk, magnesium supplementation, cardiac arrhythmias, hypomagnesemia
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diet, Humans, Magnesium, Risk Factors, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Factual, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review