The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Differential functional magnetic resonance imaging response to food pictures in successful weight-loss maintainers relative to normal-weight and obese controls
Open accessAbstract
Background Prior research indicates that successful weight-loss maintainers (SWLs) work harder than people of normal weight to maintain their weight loss, including greater dietary restriction of fat and higher physical activity levels. However, little work to date has examined how SWLs differ biologically from normal-weight (NW) and obese controls.Objective The objective was to compare the brain responses of SWLs to food pictures with those of NW and obese controls.Design Blood oxygen level-dependent responses to high- and low-energy food pictures were measured in 18 NW controls, 16 obese controls, and 17 SWLs.Results Group differences were identified in 4 regions, which indicated significant change in activation in response to the food pictures. SWLs showed greater activation in the left superior frontal region and right middle temporal region than did NW and obese controls-a pattern of results confirmed in exploratory voxel-wise analyses. Obese controls also showed greater activation in a bilateral precentral region.Conclusions These results suggest that SWLs show greater activation in frontal regions and primary and secondary visual cortices-a pattern consistent with greater inhibitory control in response to food cues and greater visual attention to the food cues. A greater engagement of inhibitory control regions in response to food cues as well as a greater monitoring of foods may promote control of food intake and successful weight-loss maintenance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In response to pictures of palatable foods, individuals who had successfully recovered from obesity showed greater activation in a region associated with inhibitory control (the superior frontal region) than obese and normal weight individuals, greater activation in a region involved in visual attention (middle temporal region) than normal weight individuals, and less activation in a motor”
From Caloric deprivation increases responsivity of attention and reward brain regions to intake, anticipated intake, and images of palatable foods (2013) · cites this paper as McCaffery et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
Long-term weight loss maintenance
Wing, R. R., & Phelan, S. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/82.1.222s · Cited by 1,941
A descriptive study of individuals successful at long-term maintenance of substantial weight loss
Klem, M., Wing, R., McGuire, M., Seagle, H., & Hill, J. (1997) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/66.2.239 · Cited by 1,060
Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods
Stoeckel, L. E., Weller, R. E., Cook, E. W., Twieg, D. B., Knowlton, R. C., & Cox, J. E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.02.031 · Cited by 857
A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss
Wing, R. R., Tate, D. F., Gorin, A. A., Raynor, H. A., & Fava, J. L. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061883 · Cited by 830
Rothemund, Y., Preuschhof, C., Bohner, G., Bauknecht, H.-C., Klingebiel, R., Flor, H., & Klapp, B. F. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.008 · Cited by 679
Bray, G. A., & Bouchard, C. (1997) · CRC Press eBooks · Cited by 618
Cortical and limbic activation during viewing of high- versus low-calorie foods
Killgore, W. D. S., Young, A. D., Femia, L. A., Bogorodzki, P., Rogowska, J., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. A. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00191-5 · Cited by 581
(1989) · PubMed · Cited by 419
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brain Insulin Resistance at the Crossroads of Metabolic and Cognitive Disorders in Humans
Kullmann, S., Heni, M., Hallschmid, M., Fritsche, A., Preissl, H. T., & Häring, H. (2016) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2015 · Cited by 654
Val‐Laillet, D., Aarts, E., Weber, B., Ferrari, M., Quaresima, V., Stoeckel, L. E., Alonso‐Alonso, M., Audette, M. A., Malbert, C., & Stice, E. M. (2015) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.016 · Cited by 466
Murdaugh, D. L., Cox, J. E., Cook, E. W., & Weller, R. E. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.071 · Cited by 341
Food reward system: current perspectives and future research needs
Alonso‐Alonso, M., Woods, S. C., Pelchat, M. L., Grigson, P. S., Stice, E. M., Farooqi, I. S., Khoo, C. S., Mattes, R. D., & Beauchamp, G. K. (2015) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuv002 · Cited by 293
Pursey, K. M., Stanwell, P., Callister, R. J., Brain, K., Collins, C. E., & Burrows, T. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2014.00007 · Cited by 239
Metadata
- Authors
- McCaffery, J. M., Haley, A. P., Sweet, L. H., Phelan, S., Raynor, H. A., Del Parigi, A., Cohen, R., & Wing, R. R.
- Affiliations
- California Polytechnic State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- McCaffery, Jeanne M
- ORCID
- Venue
- The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 928-934
- ISSN
- 0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2744621
- OpenAlex
- W2090666975
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK066787)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- weight loss maintenance, obesity, food cues, food images, brain activation, inhibitory control, visual attention, frontal cortex, middle temporal cortex, visual cortex, food intake regulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Food, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Oxygen, Reference Values, Visual Perception, Weight Loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
